what? just because he was found dead with a pillow over his head and the medical examiner phoned in the "natural causes" ruling without seeing the body and then the body was cremated against the family's wishes? c'mon...
He is without any doubt. Thomas has never let us down. He is by far the most conservative Justice ever and a true constitutional originalist. Gorsuch has already failed and I am not sold on Kavanaugh.
Thomas is the right choice. In this SJWs political mob climate, watching heads literally explode that Trump picked a black man to be on the seat for at least 30 years would be worth it.
Dude had 9 children, 5 of which were boys. Eugene is Trump's Secretary of Labor. Another is a lawyer. Another is a priest. There's one that is a career military man (garrison commander of Fort Benning) and the fifth is apparently a writer. All four girls are just listed as having families.
Very devout Catholic family. Odds are short of a rebellious child, very conservative across the board.
You know, I try to make funny comments and the Ginsberg OnlyFans joke is one of my favorites. But somehow, you just made me puke. I can blame the beer I was drinking, but it was all you.
Conservative Catholics haven't listened to a word Pope Francis has said since he became Pope, partly because he hasn't said anything ex cathedra, which is the dogma that if a Pope says eomthing "from the chair" and follows a certain formula, it's required to be believed. The last time this happened was in 1950 when Pope Pius XII defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary (Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven).
The Catechism is not dogma, it is doctrine. The recent change to the Catechism wrt death penalty is at odds with the teachings of older Popes and Saints. Unless the Pope declares ex cathedra and follows a speific formula to define the abolition of the death penalty as dogma, we can safely ignore what Pope Francis has to say about it.
Well, it would depend on what they try to do. If they do something like declare Mary Co-Redemptrix, I could live with it and accept it. If they declare that homosexuality isn't a sin, they'd be heretics.
As a conservative evangelical, this makes me sad. Who gives the pope the authority to speak infallibly? The word of God clearly states that Jesus is the (only) "way, the truth and the life" (John 14:6). No man, however sanctified, can speak infallibly. I hope conservative Catholics realize that contradictory sources of truth (ie, the word of God, the catechism, and the pope speaking infallibly) can't be reconciled and that only one can be fully believed (I'd recommend the one that states clearly "All scripture is inspired by God" 2 Timothy 3:16). There are many resources online that show contradictions between the Bible and the catechism (ie, what saves us?), I'd recommend checking some out and trying to figure out for yourself how to reconcile the contradictions between things you hold as sources of truth.
If it’s Barrett we need to fight as hard as the left fought Kavanaugh. I don’t care if she’s pro life or a Trump appointment, a weak on immigration justice is a problem!
I fit that criteria. I have no law experience, but I look at the constitution and go "Yeah, people can say what they want. People can own whatever weapons they want. It's plain as day here in the constitution." But no, all these other judges overanalyze and let their feelings control them. It's simple shit if you don't overthink it and realize that it was designed to be simple for a reason.
No one with a wife. No women. Women will pull left due to their friends not liking them on Fakebook anymore. I believe Gorsuch is cucked because of what the wife and kids went through during his confirmation, the wife is crying "Oh no not again!" if he starts to drift right. The same could very likely happen to Kavanaugh.
After that transgender ruling a few days ago, nothing needs a new amendment anymore. You just need five justices that will make up a meaning for an existing amendment.
It's been discussed on here that the Constitution does not establish birthright citizenship. It's just a thing the deep state started doing without asking anyone.
There's a clause in the constitution that is clear to anyone with a brain, however it can be misread on purpose by activist judges. That's why we need to be sure.
The ORIGINAL Constitution does not establish birthright citizenship but the 14th amendment certainly does.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside"
So to overturn this we need another amendment. Just like how the 18th amendment (prohibition of alcohol) was overturned by the 21st amendment
The key words are:
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
An illegal alien isn't. For example, they wouldn't be drafted if there was a war.
Moreover, the discussions of Founding Fathers make it clear what they meant, and a "constitutionalist" judge is meant to interpret the constitution as what it was trying to say at the time.
Truly, only a left wing activist could interpret the words you quoted as "anyone can come in here illegally, shit a child, and have the right to stay"
Absolutely. And I think this and I'm a foreigner. If I ever come live in America I don't think I should be entitled to vote.
But I can still campaign for Trump and try to convince others.
But the Title 7 case ruling sucks. In fact, the whole 1964ish bill sucks balls. Anybody should be able to hire or fire for any reason they want. The real effect the ruling will have is to increase litigation and keep people from having jobs they otherwise would have been hired for.
I support LGBTQ rights to the core of my heart. I would much rather have the burden of proof for discrimination be high and innocent before proven guilty (while banning quotas) with protections over the insanity that we have now...
Most Americans are not bigots at all. The problem is we have these laws because of a few a**holes that make us look bad and then these laws are very tricky to navigate.
I just don’t know what solution we can come up with but this quota and lawsuit system is not working.
I don't support alphabet people rights at all. But I would like people to realize the effects of these laws. If given the choice between two identical candidates to hire, except one has the potential or likelihood of a lawsuit, you are going to pick the low risk one. If you have received a lawsuit, no matter how frivolous, you will never consider a similar candidate again.
Nobody quits their job and is sued because the owner is any of those protected classes, and it works just fine. I am for abolishing the entire law --> more working, less suing. More work for everyone except lawyers.
I would actually be interested in polling people and asking them how things would change if federal anti-discrimination laws were repealed. I hate discrimination but we have it right now with immutable characteristics factoring into hiring decisions.
This had never even occurred to me and I think Thomas would do that.
He really is a beautiful eloquent man. It would make me sad to see him go, but the fact he would "do it" for that reason might actually bring a tear to my eye.
There's a Christian prophecy that's going around to this effect. They say 5 justices in Trump's time. Something like, "1 will die, 1 will retire and 3 will have to be removed from scandal that they have been caught in".
My mom keeps telling me about it. Mark Taylor is the supposed prophet, if you care.
Dont include anyone, Just pick the most Conservative person you find period. The left does this with thier extremeo crazys they put on the court time for us to do the same.
Thankyou. Conservative need to shake out their Bibles, strap on their Crusader bloodlust helmets, and stop playing the "lose as little as possible" game. Conquerservative, not cuckservative!
I don't either. I hate the idea of just picking based on their ability to fight our enemy rather than the full content of their ability to do the job. Maybe those are one in the same now.
I hate the tweet. It smells like Everything Bill-ControlledOposition-Barr says. Just find the right person and pick them. Whatever, I love trump but still somehow underestimate his strategies.
He's a time traveler and he knows RBG will soon be gone, probably before the election. He's always been right on the money with his prediction tweets before so I have faith. Sounds crazy, but check the record (No Biden).
I don't know. The biggest issue I've seen the left talking about right now is RBG. There are tweets going around saying "You aren't just voting for the next president. You're voting for RBG's replacement." If she croaks before the election, and Trump replaces her before the election, that would demoralize them heavily.
The only good thing about the recent SCotUS rulings, as shit as they are, is that the left doesn't have an issue to raise with Trump. He's been quiet the past year or so and not doing anything major such as completely stopping all future attempts at gun control, killing Obamacare, etc. The left will have less and less ammo to go after him with during the election. Once the economy rebounds, if it does before November, he will have his primary ammo against Biden back.
Obviously if Trump could replace her before his first term ends in January it would be the best for us. But she'd need to go now, it could take a few months to pass through the senate and I'm sure some RINO won't vote for the replacement if it's too close to the election (or after).
I don't think it's a good strategy for Trump to keep a low profile. They hate him regardless. I think he should go all out, give us everything we want with EO, and the base will be super energized.
Trump has accomplished much less than we thought he would. I don't think this is "concerned trolling". We had great hopes but it turned out the swamp is not easy to clean.
So many leaning Trump people might not vote, that's my fear.
Trump has accomplished much less than we thought he would.
Indeed. The swamp has been holding him back, but if he can get a 2nd term, I believe the gloves will truly, finally come off.
I don't think it's a good strategy for Trump to keep a low profile.
Not saying it's good, but what I believe is happening. If he was trying to kill Obamacare, kill all future attempts at gun control, wage a war against illegal immigrants, etc. then the left would be up in flames right now at him the way they are at police. The Democrats could say, "He took away your safety by repealing gun control forever, he took away your health care, etc." Now they have to go on him and the economy, which the coronavirus has fucked with. But if it can get back up, he'll have something to fight back with.
I will vote Trump no matter what. I hope the rest of the conservatives do as well. Biden does not energize. He's a decrepit, old pedophile who says, "Back to the way it used to be." He does not energize. He'll need shitlibs coming out by pure hatred, and while that is very doable, I think having someone energetic like Trump has a better shot.
Regardless, I'm keeping my fingers crossed and praying that Trump wins. It won't be as easy for him to win as I thought it would be a few years ago. =(
You're absolutely correct. However I would just add:
then the left would be up in flames right now at him the way they are at police.
I think they are already doing this. They are rioting against Trump, they just don't say it openly to appear "non partisan".
But when they keep saying that white people should not be silent and be "antiracist" and fight against racism...
What do they truly mean? Vote against Trump, that's what they mean.
Indeed. I grow anxious every day that Trump could lose. The SCotUS is voting pro-liberal and making Trump's orders follow law but Obama's do nothing and stay existing, Trump has been hindered for 4 years and ultimately not accomplished much, and Democrats might be able to hide Biden until the election so that the American people (and liberals) don't see how his mental state is.
The swamp is using everything in its power to stop him, and I fear that they could ultimately win so that Trump and 4 years were but a brief reprieve from globalism and evil winning. Similar to Republicans during the Obama regime, we just have a string of losses. That's what I'm afraid of. Trump absolutely must win, and he must fight back against the swamp. He must kill Obamacare, gun control, transgenderism, and save religious rights from being destroyed.
Maybe I'm just being a bit too negative (I've been told my whole life I'm a negative Ned, although I'm working on changing that), but I really am worried. If I'm dying, I will go out and vote for Trump on election day, but after everything we went through during Bush and Obama, I'm starting to remember the constant string of seemingly never-ending losing we had (I was a Ron Paul supporter back in those days).
It seems like sometimes when trump bitches about Twitter, i see "cat turd" more and other familiar names.
6 months ago it was the gay Brothers, Krassensteins, that doctor, the meth head hippy who always goes "dude why u poop your pants so hard today????" And that really fucking homosexual looking fat bald man.
I really don't know their names unless I see them but anyway, i see the gay Brothers got their wife in on it.
The Heritage Foundation and The Federalist Society are about as “conservative” as the Lincoln Project and the Log Cabin Republicans. Infiltrated fronts subversively working to undermine and destroy Conservatism, promote globalism and bring about the New World Order.
I do not want him to play anymore games. I have been very disappointed with his performance on these riots/statue destroying/etc. He seems to be grandstanding a bunch here b.c he knows wrong move could put more fuel on the flames, but honestly he needs to focus on preservation and expansion of rights, knowledge, and get a new party movement going. FUCK both the DEMs and REPs I can not trust any of them anymore.
1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 4th Amendment are under attack at such levels that if he doesn't attempt any preservation now, its all over folks. The supreme court can not be expanded, he should have chosen Amy Barett to begin with and then an extreme version of her next once RBG is done.
CHAZ should have been taken apart the first day it went up. Allowing a rogue group come in and occupy a city where people pay taxes and rent for, held at gunpoint, fleeced for entry, rapes, etc. Unfucking called for and unamerican to the highest degree. Not clapping back at DEMS for bowing (absolute most disgusting thing I have ever seen) and having African garb as to apease to the mob and pandering and imho being more racist. Not having people arrested for taking down statues of both good and bad history to me is the last straw for me to ever vote Republican again. Dems I knew were rotten, but Republicans arent any better.
Im so fucking fired up watching history be edited, deleted, erased, and we can depend on nothing to help save it. Bring in a militia to defend it, you get called extremist. Try to have a conversation about power vs civilians, get called racist. Time is up for "pandering" & "compromising"
This sentiment needs to be realized by every Pede on this board. As well as all the normal freedom loving Americans that are so close to losing everything.
We've tolerated them, reasoned with them, allowed them to grow strong and infiltrate EVERY American institution. They take everything as we compromise on anything. We've lost Education, Entertainment, Government, Military(what 1/2?) and every large Corp.
We've been "reasonable" to the point we may as well just hand them the gun and self deny that "they would never go 'that' far" as they pull the godamn trigger. They cannot be reasoned with and will never EVER tolerate us as we have them. History does not mince words on this same outcome.
I feel you, man. I really do. I'm done being polite about it and so should EVERYONE else. That BS is why we are here and we are late to the party. If we don't all show up, the silent majority will cease to exist and noone will ever know it had.
I challenge anyone to name a way to save this country that doesn't resort in us suspending the civil rights of liberals and filling mass graves with them.
I literally do not see any other way out. They have made it incredibly clear that they have zero interest in sharing the country with us. Even the slightest fucking scent of conservatism, they set their sights on and destroy it like they're a fucking Inquisition.
They can call me 'fascist', but I probably won't be able to hear them over the screaming from the flamethrowers.
I don't see any way that doesn't involve going full Thomas Jefferson - wiping them out to the last man, and rebuilding a new constitution. The trick is, how do we do it without losing everything as a nation in the process.
states succeeding is the real start where a civil war would break out imho. THe virtual signally and cultural bullshit happening is planting people on their teams to the point states will get sick of it and succeed. There will be blood eventually, right now its politics game and setting up the foundation for actions
Yeah how did that work out for us. We need justices that will unashamedly rule with conservative bias from the bench. How come the left never missed on a judicial pick?
This. Conservatives have been OBSESSED with textualism and originalism. They claim they just want to properly apply the law as written. However, as we have seen, the left simply wants to rewrite the law. As Sean Davis recently tweeted, the conservative legal movement is dead. Josh Hawley gave a similar speech on the senate floor.
So with that, we need to be up front and honest: the role of a judge is not to apply the law as written, rather, his job is to rewrite the law in the conservative image, and nothing less.
Throw out the list. It came from a globalist oriented organization. Gorsuch has already proven he isn't a constitutional originalist as advertised. I predicted it given he came from leftist academia. I am suspicious of Kavanaugh as well because he lived in the swamp too long.
The correct solution is to go to the most conservative Justice in the history of the court Clarence Thomas and ask him for his list of candidates who are most like him. And for God's sake and ours don't pick a woman next no matter what.
Just want to see the left squirm because a based and respected black conservative judge is nominated. As I stated, the most most qualified person should be nominated.
Totally agree, but you also have to admit that trolling them with a woman or black man at least cancels out one of their go-to insults (sexist / racist) that we know they'll hurl at him. It's just entertaining to watch their brains fizzle for a bit.
Hopefully he stops listening to the pussyass Federalist society. After what happened with Gorsuch, let's stop fucking around with "textualist", "originalist" horseshit.
Find some conservatives willing to fight instead of spineless wusses looking to virtue signal.
maybe Trump should consider adding to the bench like the Dems wanted, and stack them with this list? what'll happen if the Dems can cheat their way to the Office in November?? very important election
you're not wrong at all, and it was partly in jest , but you can't deny they are throwing out precedent and rule of law at an exponentially growing rate. The game is changing. I often think about what's going on currently, and how any actions and laws passed now will actually hurt any long term ability to keep the Republic free....scary. but again, you're not wrong
"So the point of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law as written?"
"Yes"
"Okay, then let's have half of them do that, and the other half can interpret the laws how they feel they should apply."
Seriously, wtf happened. This Court needs swung wildly to the conservative side. I don't necessarily care if a Democrat gets elected president (in an honest election) if I know that they will be forced to play by the rules in our Constitution. But in the current set up, another Dem presidency will be a true tragedy for this great nation.
Today, the court is 4-4 with Roberts as a deep state controlled swing vote.
Once RBG passes, and Trump nominates her successor, then the court will be 5-3 and Roberts' vote won't matter as decisions of 6-3 or 5-4 are exactly the same. The deep state's control over Roberts will be effectively nullified.
THIS is why the left is going bat shit insane trying to prevent Trump's reelection. THIS is the entire reason behind the impeachment, the pandemic quarantine and the Democrat/Antifa riots. The left MUST prevent Trump's reelection, and they WILL go to ANY extreme to prevent it. AND WE MUST DEFEAT THEM AND REELECT PRESIDENT TRUMP! It is nothing short of the survival of the Nation, and indeed the World, that is at stake.
Good. We need to know which judges are on his short list. Verify they are not closeted globalists (e.g. Council on Foreign Relations membership), independently wealthy, have nothing in personal lives to be blackmailed over and a long-term record of rulings based on the law!
No legislating from the bench. That’s congress’s job.
Put me at the top list. I’ll make libtards cry for the next 40-50 years. And since I’m Asian, I think it’s no big deal to be called a racist by Commies. Lmao
He’ll likely have to pick whoever will pass Senate so it’s incredibly important that we gain a HUGE lead in the Senate.
If we get a strong lead, he has more freedom to put in justices that aren’t so activist. Otherwise he has to try and appeal to the activist Dems that see courts as tools of legislating and choose someone more moderate.
What does this mean for us? Support your fucking Senators! We need to give House and Senate Republican candidates war chests to fight with and funding to use - period.
Let's just clone Justice Thomas
I consider Thomas to be the greatest justice in our history. Won’t stop the left from calling me racist.
John Jay, Scalia, John Marshall, and Thomas are the best justices in history, imo.
Supreme Court all star bench
If we could just clone all of them to be on the court, I'd be so fucking happy.
Scalia. First justice to die of Covid
F
first justice to die of arkansacide.
what? just because he was found dead with a pillow over his head and the medical examiner phoned in the "natural causes" ruling without seeing the body and then the body was cremated against the family's wishes? c'mon...
How can they decide to do that against a family’s wishes?
Well, first off, you just do it.
Then you say "oops", and apologize for the miscommunication.
they are the Deep State. they can do whatever they want. only one man can stand against them.
And who lead the charge to try to destroy him, and is now being held up as some gatekeeper of the black man?
Some things never change.
He is without any doubt. Thomas has never let us down. He is by far the most conservative Justice ever and a true constitutional originalist. Gorsuch has already failed and I am not sold on Kavanaugh.
If you support Justice Thomas you ain't black
And find a way to clone Scalia so we can get the scathing opinions again.
Thomas is more right wing but Scalia was far more brutal.
Thomas is the right choice. In this SJWs political mob climate, watching heads literally explode that Trump picked a black man to be on the seat for at least 30 years would be worth it.
But we can’t like a black justice. We’re rayciss.
worst rayciss eva. wypipo!!
Is Scalia's son as conservative as he was?
Which one? I know of a Father Scalia who is a priest in the Diocese of Arlington.
His family is staunchly religious-conservative
Dude had 9 children, 5 of which were boys. Eugene is Trump's Secretary of Labor. Another is a lawyer. Another is a priest. There's one that is a career military man (garrison commander of Fort Benning) and the fifth is apparently a writer. All four girls are just listed as having families.
Very devout Catholic family. Odds are short of a rebellious child, very conservative across the board.
This is the answer.
Ginsburg has been dead for a long time.
Yeah, she hasn't updated her OnlyFans in awhile.
lol gross ha ha
Still better than Hillary Clintonm's one.
🤢
Just wait for Ilhan Omar's. It's just beheading videos.
i cant buy a new smith and wesson because of her hole.
You know, I try to make funny comments and the Ginsberg OnlyFans joke is one of my favorites. But somehow, you just made me puke. I can blame the beer I was drinking, but it was all you.
I was about to eat my lunch.
Yuck lmfaoo
bruh
I love making this joke for some reason.
No. The first thing you'll hear if Biden wins is the first shot in the Second American Revolution.
She sold her soul to the same demon that keeps Marina Abramović alive probably offered it baby parts from PP as part of the deal.
Or he knows that Obama spied on Roberts and is therefore blackmailing him.
Bingo we have a winner!
Trump is just energizing his base with this list of conservative justices. He doesn't "know something" unusual.
Trump is campaigning.
RBG has been dead for over a year. Just need to expose it
Hope he lets the rest of us know soon.
RBG will never die. She'll just vanish with a bang and the odor of brimstone.
I hope he picks some very pissed-off 35 year olds who are genetically tested to make sure they lack the Roberts-Gorsuch "cuck gene."
This board wants Barrett cause when STRONK WAHMEN ignoring that she'll drift left like all female leaders.
Barrett could be weak on immigration because of her family & the Vatican.
Immigration is basically the most important issue besides fighting Globalists that want to take us over.
Good God no, white male to replace RBG for maximum leftist meltdown.
We need Don Willett!
Conservative Catholics haven't listened to a word Pope Francis has said since he became Pope, partly because he hasn't said anything ex cathedra, which is the dogma that if a Pope says eomthing "from the chair" and follows a certain formula, it's required to be believed. The last time this happened was in 1950 when Pope Pius XII defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary (Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven).
The Catechism is not dogma, it is doctrine. The recent change to the Catechism wrt death penalty is at odds with the teachings of older Popes and Saints. Unless the Pope declares ex cathedra and follows a speific formula to define the abolition of the death penalty as dogma, we can safely ignore what Pope Francis has to say about it.
What happens when the Anti-Pope and his cabal of Vatican cardinals declare something ex-cathedra? What are you going to do?
Well, it would depend on what they try to do. If they do something like declare Mary Co-Redemptrix, I could live with it and accept it. If they declare that homosexuality isn't a sin, they'd be heretics.
As a conservative evangelical, this makes me sad. Who gives the pope the authority to speak infallibly? The word of God clearly states that Jesus is the (only) "way, the truth and the life" (John 14:6). No man, however sanctified, can speak infallibly. I hope conservative Catholics realize that contradictory sources of truth (ie, the word of God, the catechism, and the pope speaking infallibly) can't be reconciled and that only one can be fully believed (I'd recommend the one that states clearly "All scripture is inspired by God" 2 Timothy 3:16). There are many resources online that show contradictions between the Bible and the catechism (ie, what saves us?), I'd recommend checking some out and trying to figure out for yourself how to reconcile the contradictions between things you hold as sources of truth.
Yeah fuck that if it's Barrett we are sooooo fucked.
If it’s Barrett we need to fight as hard as the left fought Kavanaugh. I don’t care if she’s pro life or a Trump appointment, a weak on immigration justice is a problem!
No more women, please.
I'd be fine with a woman but only if she's to the right of Pinochet.
i don't want Barrett. I don't trust her, and I think some of the enthusiasm on this board for her seems less than organic.
Nah it's just dudes simping out. Same as they did with Tulsi, who is just another Democrat.
I used to simp-out for Tulsi until I found out one too many things about her, and now all the magic is gone. I think it's out of my system finally.
It's about abortion. There are many single-issue proponents when it comes to SCOTUS nominees.
Women have a proclivity for bias of feelings over facts
would be absolutely glorious
I fit that criteria. I have no law experience, but I look at the constitution and go "Yeah, people can say what they want. People can own whatever weapons they want. It's plain as day here in the constitution." But no, all these other judges overanalyze and let their feelings control them. It's simple shit if you don't overthink it and realize that it was designed to be simple for a reason.
No one with a wife. No women. Women will pull left due to their friends not liking them on Fakebook anymore. I believe Gorsuch is cucked because of what the wife and kids went through during his confirmation, the wife is crying "Oh no not again!" if he starts to drift right. The same could very likely happen to Kavanaugh.
Thomas has a wife. Scalia had a wife. Don't know what you're blabbering about.
We need to ensure it's someone who will vote to remove birthright citizenship.
After that transgender ruling a few days ago, nothing needs a new amendment anymore. You just need five justices that will make up a meaning for an existing amendment.
Bingo. One re-interpretation of "subject to the jurisdiction of" and we win.
Winner winner chicken tendie dinner.
Politics is unfortunately fought in the courts.
Like the word "the" now meaning "not the."
It's been discussed on here that the Constitution does not establish birthright citizenship. It's just a thing the deep state started doing without asking anyone.
There's a clause in the constitution that is clear to anyone with a brain, however it can be misread on purpose by activist judges. That's why we need to be sure.
The ORIGINAL Constitution does not establish birthright citizenship but the 14th amendment certainly does.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside"
So to overturn this we need another amendment. Just like how the 18th amendment (prohibition of alcohol) was overturned by the 21st amendment
The key words are: and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
An illegal alien isn't. For example, they wouldn't be drafted if there was a war.
Moreover, the discussions of Founding Fathers make it clear what they meant, and a "constitutionalist" judge is meant to interpret the constitution as what it was trying to say at the time.
Truly, only a left wing activist could interpret the words you quoted as "anyone can come in here illegally, shit a child, and have the right to stay"
How would gaining citizenship work without birthright citizenship?
Like it works in Italy and many other countries. By blood. It's called jus sanguinis.
I would also remove any path to citizenship: marriage, green card, etc. Citizenship by blood only.
This way you can even get legal immigrants, but they won't colonize the country because they won't be able to vote.
Absolutely. And I think this and I'm a foreigner. If I ever come live in America I don't think I should be entitled to vote. But I can still campaign for Trump and try to convince others.
Blood rights are also evil. You really need limits on "the good old boys."
Eh? The Founding Fathers did not establish birthright citizenship, in the US it's just the deep state that started doing it.
You'll have to end 14A before any of that can happen, and I'd much prefer to end the USC first.
The 14A clearly refers to freed slaves, and not the children of foreigners.
No change in the constitution is necessary.
Do NOT include Mike Lee.
Or Andrew Napolitano
Oh, he never would. Just stating the obvious. Napolitano is a loser and Trump generally tries to avoid people like him.
I don't k ow what they have on him but he absolutely hates Trump now.
Napolitano is an ambulance chaser.
Just here to say, for the record, fuck Mike Lee
Or Barrett.
He needs an extra one to make up for Gorsuch
Has Gorsuch been that bad?
edit: I'm an idiot. I was thinking Kavanaugh.
Tucker was right, the Mob now rules. Thanks Twitter.
He needs 9 appointments.
10, to make up for Gorsuch
Gorsuch is a good justice who opposed DACA.
Gorsuch murdered textualism
But the Title 7 case ruling sucks. In fact, the whole 1964ish bill sucks balls. Anybody should be able to hire or fire for any reason they want. The real effect the ruling will have is to increase litigation and keep people from having jobs they otherwise would have been hired for.
I support LGBTQ rights to the core of my heart. I would much rather have the burden of proof for discrimination be high and innocent before proven guilty (while banning quotas) with protections over the insanity that we have now...
Most Americans are not bigots at all. The problem is we have these laws because of a few a**holes that make us look bad and then these laws are very tricky to navigate.
I just don’t know what solution we can come up with but this quota and lawsuit system is not working.
I don't support alphabet people rights at all. But I would like people to realize the effects of these laws. If given the choice between two identical candidates to hire, except one has the potential or likelihood of a lawsuit, you are going to pick the low risk one. If you have received a lawsuit, no matter how frivolous, you will never consider a similar candidate again.
Nobody quits their job and is sued because the owner is any of those protected classes, and it works just fine. I am for abolishing the entire law --> more working, less suing. More work for everyone except lawyers.
I would actually be interested in polling people and asking them how things would change if federal anti-discrimination laws were repealed. I hate discrimination but we have it right now with immutable characteristics factoring into hiring decisions.
I support LG rights (and by extension, B), but Ts are mentally ill degenerates.
And anyone who comes after the T is an attention-whoring bandwagoning liberal faggot who isn't oppressed at all, but is just pretending they are.
Thomas may retire to insure young conservative blood on the court for another 30 - 40 years if Trump gets re-elected.
I will take his spot. I rule that ICE funding is 1000x'ed. All these American cops need jobs.
This had never even occurred to me and I think Thomas would do that.
He really is a beautiful eloquent man. It would make me sad to see him go, but the fact he would "do it" for that reason might actually bring a tear to my eye.
There's a Christian prophecy that's going around to this effect. They say 5 justices in Trump's time. Something like, "1 will die, 1 will retire and 3 will have to be removed from scandal that they have been caught in".
My mom keeps telling me about it. Mark Taylor is the supposed prophet, if you care.
Dont include anyone, Just pick the most Conservative person you find period. The left does this with thier extremeo crazys they put on the court time for us to do the same.
No we need an extreme Constitutionalist. Can't believe I had to say that.
you two are saying the same thing
Basically. There are liberal judges, and there are judges who can read.
"Neil" is a weak name. So is "Brett." Don't trust either of them.
No not that, completely disagree, we need an insanely constitutionalist judge instead. Someone to the far right of Dr Carson, even!
I wonder if Ron Paul would accept.
Not playing as extreme as they do is exactly why we are in such a shit hole. Maybe even past the point of no return.
It's not time to play, it is years too late. But if we don't show up and beat them, well... you don't have to wield a sword to die on one.
Thankyou. Conservative need to shake out their Bibles, strap on their Crusader bloodlust helmets, and stop playing the "lose as little as possible" game. Conquerservative, not cuckservative!
It will end. Sooner or later, even if that means we have to give out free helicopter rides after we take a fully fallen country back.
I don't either. I hate the idea of just picking based on their ability to fight our enemy rather than the full content of their ability to do the job. Maybe those are one in the same now.
I hate the tweet. It smells like Everything Bill-ControlledOposition-Barr says. Just find the right person and pick them. Whatever, I love trump but still somehow underestimate his strategies.
Uh, extremely law abiding by following the Constitution, vs progressive, who seek to create their own laws.
He's a time traveler and he knows RBG will soon be gone, probably before the election. He's always been right on the money with his prediction tweets before so I have faith. Sounds crazy, but check the record (No Biden).
I hope she doesn't. Replacing RBG would really energize the Demonrats. We need to make it pass under the radar.
I don't know. The biggest issue I've seen the left talking about right now is RBG. There are tweets going around saying "You aren't just voting for the next president. You're voting for RBG's replacement." If she croaks before the election, and Trump replaces her before the election, that would demoralize them heavily.
The only good thing about the recent SCotUS rulings, as shit as they are, is that the left doesn't have an issue to raise with Trump. He's been quiet the past year or so and not doing anything major such as completely stopping all future attempts at gun control, killing Obamacare, etc. The left will have less and less ammo to go after him with during the election. Once the economy rebounds, if it does before November, he will have his primary ammo against Biden back.
Only time will tell with this stuff...
If RGB was pronounced dead today, he wouldn't be able to get a replacement. The Dems would draw it out to 2021
holy shit dude RBG replacement this summer would be world war REEEE
Obviously if Trump could replace her before his first term ends in January it would be the best for us. But she'd need to go now, it could take a few months to pass through the senate and I'm sure some RINO won't vote for the replacement if it's too close to the election (or after).
I don't think it's a good strategy for Trump to keep a low profile. They hate him regardless. I think he should go all out, give us everything we want with EO, and the base will be super energized.
Trump has accomplished much less than we thought he would. I don't think this is "concerned trolling". We had great hopes but it turned out the swamp is not easy to clean. So many leaning Trump people might not vote, that's my fear.
Indeed. The swamp has been holding him back, but if he can get a 2nd term, I believe the gloves will truly, finally come off.
Not saying it's good, but what I believe is happening. If he was trying to kill Obamacare, kill all future attempts at gun control, wage a war against illegal immigrants, etc. then the left would be up in flames right now at him the way they are at police. The Democrats could say, "He took away your safety by repealing gun control forever, he took away your health care, etc." Now they have to go on him and the economy, which the coronavirus has fucked with. But if it can get back up, he'll have something to fight back with.
I will vote Trump no matter what. I hope the rest of the conservatives do as well. Biden does not energize. He's a decrepit, old pedophile who says, "Back to the way it used to be." He does not energize. He'll need shitlibs coming out by pure hatred, and while that is very doable, I think having someone energetic like Trump has a better shot.
Regardless, I'm keeping my fingers crossed and praying that Trump wins. It won't be as easy for him to win as I thought it would be a few years ago. =(
You're absolutely correct. However I would just add:
I think they are already doing this. They are rioting against Trump, they just don't say it openly to appear "non partisan". But when they keep saying that white people should not be silent and be "antiracist" and fight against racism... What do they truly mean? Vote against Trump, that's what they mean.
Indeed. I grow anxious every day that Trump could lose. The SCotUS is voting pro-liberal and making Trump's orders follow law but Obama's do nothing and stay existing, Trump has been hindered for 4 years and ultimately not accomplished much, and Democrats might be able to hide Biden until the election so that the American people (and liberals) don't see how his mental state is.
The swamp is using everything in its power to stop him, and I fear that they could ultimately win so that Trump and 4 years were but a brief reprieve from globalism and evil winning. Similar to Republicans during the Obama regime, we just have a string of losses. That's what I'm afraid of. Trump absolutely must win, and he must fight back against the swamp. He must kill Obamacare, gun control, transgenderism, and save religious rights from being destroyed.
Maybe I'm just being a bit too negative (I've been told my whole life I'm a negative Ned, although I'm working on changing that), but I really am worried. If I'm dying, I will go out and vote for Trump on election day, but after everything we went through during Bush and Obama, I'm starting to remember the constant string of seemingly never-ending losing we had (I was a Ron Paul supporter back in those days).
I'm not fucking scared and you shouldn't be either. Grow a backbone and carry a firearm. We are at war and have a republic to save.
<3 <3 <3
I read that as "Balls balls balls"
that works too!
True! And also, RGB is probably hoping for a democrat winner, so she is holding out. But the joke is on her :)
Lol dude she's waiting for the 2020 election. She's gonna step down at the right time.
Maybe she thinks she can last until 2025...
He should pick me. Id just write "Fuck off commies" in all my opinions though
"Fuck off commies" should be the next Executive Order.
I'll do it for free and work day and night to interpret the law AS WRITTEN
No family is probably the answer.
celibate justices lol
I mean they basically are the priests of the American state religion whose ruling are infallible dogma
What’s the American state religion?
He's triggering them REEEEEEs. 😆
Comments on this Twitter post from...”Mrs Krassenstein”
LOL
I find it odd how these people cycle in and out.
It seems like sometimes when trump bitches about Twitter, i see "cat turd" more and other familiar names.
6 months ago it was the gay Brothers, Krassensteins, that doctor, the meth head hippy who always goes "dude why u poop your pants so hard today????" And that really fucking homosexual looking fat bald man.
I really don't know their names unless I see them but anyway, i see the gay Brothers got their wife in on it.
The meth head hippy is Jeff Tierdich, but he doesn't write like that. The poop talk is Jeff Guterman.
Fuck John Roberts and all the other Liberal "Justices"
The Heritage Foundation and The Federalist Society are about as “conservative” as the Lincoln Project and the Log Cabin Republicans. Infiltrated fronts subversively working to undermine and destroy Conservatism, promote globalism and bring about the New World Order.
Federalist Society has been the recommending group as I understand.
I do not want him to play anymore games. I have been very disappointed with his performance on these riots/statue destroying/etc. He seems to be grandstanding a bunch here b.c he knows wrong move could put more fuel on the flames, but honestly he needs to focus on preservation and expansion of rights, knowledge, and get a new party movement going. FUCK both the DEMs and REPs I can not trust any of them anymore.
1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 4th Amendment are under attack at such levels that if he doesn't attempt any preservation now, its all over folks. The supreme court can not be expanded, he should have chosen Amy Barett to begin with and then an extreme version of her next once RBG is done.
CHAZ should have been taken apart the first day it went up. Allowing a rogue group come in and occupy a city where people pay taxes and rent for, held at gunpoint, fleeced for entry, rapes, etc. Unfucking called for and unamerican to the highest degree. Not clapping back at DEMS for bowing (absolute most disgusting thing I have ever seen) and having African garb as to apease to the mob and pandering and imho being more racist. Not having people arrested for taking down statues of both good and bad history to me is the last straw for me to ever vote Republican again. Dems I knew were rotten, but Republicans arent any better.
Im so fucking fired up watching history be edited, deleted, erased, and we can depend on nothing to help save it. Bring in a militia to defend it, you get called extremist. Try to have a conversation about power vs civilians, get called racist. Time is up for "pandering" & "compromising"
This sentiment needs to be realized by every Pede on this board. As well as all the normal freedom loving Americans that are so close to losing everything.
We've tolerated them, reasoned with them, allowed them to grow strong and infiltrate EVERY American institution. They take everything as we compromise on anything. We've lost Education, Entertainment, Government, Military(what 1/2?) and every large Corp.
We've been "reasonable" to the point we may as well just hand them the gun and self deny that "they would never go 'that' far" as they pull the godamn trigger. They cannot be reasoned with and will never EVER tolerate us as we have them. History does not mince words on this same outcome.
I feel you, man. I really do. I'm done being polite about it and so should EVERYONE else. That BS is why we are here and we are late to the party. If we don't all show up, the silent majority will cease to exist and noone will ever know it had.
Eh, I think you've posted some Chicken Little level hysteria imo, but we still need warnings such as yours.
I challenge anyone to name a way to save this country that doesn't resort in us suspending the civil rights of liberals and filling mass graves with them.
I literally do not see any other way out. They have made it incredibly clear that they have zero interest in sharing the country with us. Even the slightest fucking scent of conservatism, they set their sights on and destroy it like they're a fucking Inquisition.
They can call me 'fascist', but I probably won't be able to hear them over the screaming from the flamethrowers.
I don't see any way that doesn't involve going full Thomas Jefferson - wiping them out to the last man, and rebuilding a new constitution. The trick is, how do we do it without losing everything as a nation in the process.
states succeeding is the real start where a civil war would break out imho. THe virtual signally and cultural bullshit happening is planting people on their teams to the point states will get sick of it and succeed. There will be blood eventually, right now its politics game and setting up the foundation for actions
Yeah how did that work out for us. We need justices that will unashamedly rule with conservative bias from the bench. How come the left never missed on a judicial pick?
This. Conservatives have been OBSESSED with textualism and originalism. They claim they just want to properly apply the law as written. However, as we have seen, the left simply wants to rewrite the law. As Sean Davis recently tweeted, the conservative legal movement is dead. Josh Hawley gave a similar speech on the senate floor.
So with that, we need to be up front and honest: the role of a judge is not to apply the law as written, rather, his job is to rewrite the law in the conservative image, and nothing less.
Throw out the list. It came from a globalist oriented organization. Gorsuch has already proven he isn't a constitutional originalist as advertised. I predicted it given he came from leftist academia. I am suspicious of Kavanaugh as well because he lived in the swamp too long.
The correct solution is to go to the most conservative Justice in the history of the court Clarence Thomas and ask him for his list of candidates who are most like him. And for God's sake and ours don't pick a woman next no matter what.
When Trump wins a second term, I hope Thomas steps down to let Trump appoint a younger conservative justice to the bench.
I think he will. And while a persons qualifications should be the main consideration, I wouldn’t mind seeing a black judge appointed to take the seat.
Just want to see the left squirm because a based and respected black conservative judge is nominated. As I stated, the most most qualified person should be nominated.
Totally agree, but you also have to admit that trolling them with a woman or black man at least cancels out one of their go-to insults (sexist / racist) that we know they'll hurl at him. It's just entertaining to watch their brains fizzle for a bit.
Hmmm, could POTUS know something about a possible opening on the SC soon? Has he spoken with RBG's doctors?
Maybe he knows that Obama spied on Roberts and is therefore blackmailing him.
Hopefully he stops listening to the pussyass Federalist society. After what happened with Gorsuch, let's stop fucking around with "textualist", "originalist" horseshit.
Find some conservatives willing to fight instead of spineless wusses looking to virtue signal.
Let's take back the house and impeach John Roberts. Then we can remove his sorry ass.
Dems impeach. Repubs don't act.
Sad but true.
And someone needs to do a parody video of the Lovin' Spoonful's song using your username lol
He knows RBG's days are numbered.
The Courts have arrogated legislative and executive power. No single justice makes any difference whatsoever when the system is corrupted
Dont make a list, that just gives the liberals something to narrow down their search and destroy opposition research.
He should keep it internal. Making it public gives the opposition a head start on their smear campaign.
RBG health and wellness check??
Any further look into what happened with Scalia??
Why did Kennedy REALLY step down??
maybe Trump should consider adding to the bench like the Dems wanted, and stack them with this list? what'll happen if the Dems can cheat their way to the Office in November?? very important election
you're not wrong at all, and it was partly in jest , but you can't deny they are throwing out precedent and rule of law at an exponentially growing rate. The game is changing. I often think about what's going on currently, and how any actions and laws passed now will actually hurt any long term ability to keep the Republic free....scary. but again, you're not wrong
Daniel Day Lewis' movie about oil comes to mind....
"So the point of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law as written?"
"Yes"
"Okay, then let's have half of them do that, and the other half can interpret the laws how they feel they should apply."
Seriously, wtf happened. This Court needs swung wildly to the conservative side. I don't necessarily care if a Democrat gets elected president (in an honest election) if I know that they will be forced to play by the rules in our Constitution. But in the current set up, another Dem presidency will be a true tragedy for this great nation.
White supremacist rapist child molester every one of them.
Today, the court is 4-4 with Roberts as a deep state controlled swing vote.
Once RBG passes, and Trump nominates her successor, then the court will be 5-3 and Roberts' vote won't matter as decisions of 6-3 or 5-4 are exactly the same. The deep state's control over Roberts will be effectively nullified.
THIS is why the left is going bat shit insane trying to prevent Trump's reelection. THIS is the entire reason behind the impeachment, the pandemic quarantine and the Democrat/Antifa riots. The left MUST prevent Trump's reelection, and they WILL go to ANY extreme to prevent it. AND WE MUST DEFEAT THEM AND REELECT PRESIDENT TRUMP! It is nothing short of the survival of the Nation, and indeed the World, that is at stake.
TRUMP 2020!
Everyone forgets that Stephen Breyer is almost as old as RBG and, being male, far beyond life expectancy.
Add this to the list of why a landslide is incoming. The voter turn out is going to be massive!
I think he'd be great.
Fuck no, he killed the prominence of a 3rd party. He's still a teetering RINO
Come on Ted just do it for the good of the country.
just pack the court, it’s constitutional
Uncle Thomas The Left
Good. We need to know which judges are on his short list. Verify they are not closeted globalists (e.g. Council on Foreign Relations membership), independently wealthy, have nothing in personal lives to be blackmailed over and a long-term record of rulings based on the law!
No legislating from the bench. That’s congress’s job.
Maybe he'll propose adding more Justices. The left will surely have a meltdown. Then they cant try it if/when they come back to power.
Force them to pick a side now. Lol.
Totally trolling for reeeeee! With this tweet, love it!
And the comments include a bunch of fakers stickied to the top like always.
Who should of stuck to the list to begin with
"IF GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY"
THAT MEANS YOU RBG
Need some good replacements for Breyer and Ginsberg.
then neither can run for pres
Put me at the top list. I’ll make libtards cry for the next 40-50 years. And since I’m Asian, I think it’s no big deal to be called a racist by Commies. Lmao
Wait, who died?
Only those MORE conservative than Thomas. #ThomasorBetter
He’ll likely have to pick whoever will pass Senate so it’s incredibly important that we gain a HUGE lead in the Senate.
If we get a strong lead, he has more freedom to put in justices that aren’t so activist. Otherwise he has to try and appeal to the activist Dems that see courts as tools of legislating and choose someone more moderate.
What does this mean for us? Support your fucking Senators! We need to give House and Senate Republican candidates war chests to fight with and funding to use - period.