3034
Comments (366)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
120
barron_height_watch 120 points ago +120 / -0

I hope he picks some very pissed-off 35 year olds who are genetically tested to make sure they lack the Roberts-Gorsuch "cuck gene."

49
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 49 points ago +52 / -3

This board wants Barrett cause when STRONK WAHMEN ignoring that she'll drift left like all female leaders.

31
RenaissanceOfHope 31 points ago +31 / -0

Barrett could be weak on immigration because of her family & the Vatican.

Immigration is basically the most important issue besides fighting Globalists that want to take us over.

14
barron_height_watch 14 points ago +15 / -1

Good God no, white male to replace RBG for maximum leftist meltdown.

2
RenaissanceOfHope 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need Don Willett!

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
Imitate214 1 point ago +2 / -1

the Vatican

Conservative Catholics haven't listened to a word Pope Francis has said since he became Pope, partly because he hasn't said anything ex cathedra, which is the dogma that if a Pope says eomthing "from the chair" and follows a certain formula, it's required to be believed. The last time this happened was in 1950 when Pope Pius XII defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary (Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven).

The Catechism is not dogma, it is doctrine. The recent change to the Catechism wrt death penalty is at odds with the teachings of older Popes and Saints. Unless the Pope declares ex cathedra and follows a speific formula to define the abolition of the death penalty as dogma, we can safely ignore what Pope Francis has to say about it.

1
OnlyAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

What happens when the Anti-Pope and his cabal of Vatican cardinals declare something ex-cathedra? What are you going to do?

1
4Christ 1 point ago +2 / -1

As a conservative evangelical, this makes me sad. Who gives the pope the authority to speak infallibly? The word of God clearly states that Jesus is the (only) "way, the truth and the life" (John 14:6). No man, however sanctified, can speak infallibly. I hope conservative Catholics realize that contradictory sources of truth (ie, the word of God, the catechism, and the pope speaking infallibly) can't be reconciled and that only one can be fully believed (I'd recommend the one that states clearly "All scripture is inspired by God" 2 Timothy 3:16). There are many resources online that show contradictions between the Bible and the catechism (ie, what saves us?), I'd recommend checking some out and trying to figure out for yourself how to reconcile the contradictions between things you hold as sources of truth.

0
americathegr888 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yeah fuck that if it's Barrett we are sooooo fucked.

6
RenaissanceOfHope 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it’s Barrett we need to fight as hard as the left fought Kavanaugh. I don’t care if she’s pro life or a Trump appointment, a weak on immigration justice is a problem!

2
Scungette 2 points ago +2 / -0

No more women, please.

19
rooftoptendie 19 points ago +19 / -0

i don't want Barrett. I don't trust her, and I think some of the enthusiasm on this board for her seems less than organic.

16
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 16 points ago +16 / -0

Nah it's just dudes simping out. Same as they did with Tulsi, who is just another Democrat.

6
rooftoptendie 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to simp-out for Tulsi until I found out one too many things about her, and now all the magic is gone. I think it's out of my system finally.

4
ScrewReddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's about abortion. There are many single-issue proponents when it comes to SCOTUS nominees.

18
LavonAffair 18 points ago +20 / -2

Women have a proclivity for bias of feelings over facts

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
21
jennyfrutex 21 points ago +21 / -0

would be absolutely glorious

6
America1stAndOnly 6 points ago +7 / -1

I fit that criteria. I have no law experience, but I look at the constitution and go "Yeah, people can say what they want. People can own whatever weapons they want. It's plain as day here in the constitution." But no, all these other judges overanalyze and let their feelings control them. It's simple shit if you don't overthink it and realize that it was designed to be simple for a reason.

3
mrspaulrevere 3 points ago +4 / -1

No one with a wife. No women. Women will pull left due to their friends not liking them on Fakebook anymore. I believe Gorsuch is cucked because of what the wife and kids went through during his confirmation, the wife is crying "Oh no not again!" if he starts to drift right. The same could very likely happen to Kavanaugh.

3
DeplorableCentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thomas has a wife. Scalia had a wife. Don't know what you're blabbering about.