Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
I'm not quite black pilled yet. But have you seen what white women are up to lately? Karening, Antifa-ing, and failing miserably in their government jobs. Sorry but NOPE!
Before calling my comment "dumb" you might want to check your facts.
There is no requirement that a SCOTUS Judge have a law degree. None.
These SCOTUS Judges were never lawyers:
Henry Billings Brown
Melville Fuller
William Henry Moody
George Shiras, Jr.
Benjamin N. Cardozo
Joseph McKenna
Stanley Forman Reed
Robert H. Jackson
James Wilson
And these SCOTUS Judges practiced law at some point in their lives, to varying degrees, but none of these guys went to law school:
James F. Byrnes
Samuel Chase
John Hessin Clarke
James Iredell
Thomas Johnson
Additionally, there are some 20 justices who only trained to the level of what would, today, be considered an undergraduate criminal justice degree, and not a law degree.
A law degree, or experience as a lawyer is not required to be a SCOTUS.
I was kinda joking in suggesting Candace, but a few non-legal minds that primarily used common sense and morality more than relying upon precedent would be a refreshing change.
The only legal documents that I demand a SCOTUS Judge be familiar with are the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution.
I would LOVE to see one (or two) non lawyers on the court. I doubt it would ever happen, but I think taking the court out of the hands of lawyers exclusively would be a good thing.
Also, every single current SCOTUS Judge went to Harvard or Yale, so some more educationally diversity, with judges from non-elite schools would be nice, too.
Women by their very nature want to appear fair, keyword: appear.
Women are all about appearances even the "based" ones. It is a tough pill to swallow. Women do not belong in the justice system more than they belong in any area where making though decisions is necessary.
I think her best shot was if Ginsburg retired or died last year or earlier this year. When Trump is re-elected and the houses are beefed up, he can choose anyone he wants. She may still get it, but other options become available as well.
I'm not quite black pilled yet. But have you seen what white women are up to lately? Karening, Antifa-ing, and failing miserably in their government jobs. Sorry but NOPE!
NOT CONSERVATIVE ENOUGH.
I WANT SOMEONE WHO LOOKS AT EVERY CASE WITH THE SAME EXPRESSION SEVERUS SNAPE MAKES CONDUCTING A HARRY POTTER HOMEWORK REVIEW
how about this lady instead?
https://thedonald.win/p/FzKYKUjR/sydneyfuckingpowell/c/
hey, i am not a vagina-matters kind of guy, and yes... woman (as a group) tend to be vote the wrong way,
but make no mistake, there are some great MAGA woman.
besides... i'd take a Justice Candace Owens over John Roberts or Neil Gorsich (I'd even take her over Brett Kavanaugh) any day
Before calling my comment "dumb" you might want to check your facts.
There is no requirement that a SCOTUS Judge have a law degree. None.
These SCOTUS Judges were never lawyers:
And these SCOTUS Judges practiced law at some point in their lives, to varying degrees, but none of these guys went to law school:
Additionally, there are some 20 justices who only trained to the level of what would, today, be considered an undergraduate criminal justice degree, and not a law degree.
A law degree, or experience as a lawyer is not required to be a SCOTUS.
I was kinda joking in suggesting Candace, but a few non-legal minds that primarily used common sense and morality more than relying upon precedent would be a refreshing change.
The only legal documents that I demand a SCOTUS Judge be familiar with are the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution.
I would LOVE to see one (or two) non lawyers on the court. I doubt it would ever happen, but I think taking the court out of the hands of lawyers exclusively would be a good thing.
Also, every single current SCOTUS Judge went to Harvard or Yale, so some more educationally diversity, with judges from non-elite schools would be nice, too.
actually adopting Black babies is exactly what people should be doing
i mean... sure, it'd be better to adopt American babies
but adopting a baby is OK with me
Women by their very nature want to appear fair, keyword: appear.
Women are all about appearances even the "based" ones. It is a tough pill to swallow. Women do not belong in the justice system more than they belong in any area where making though decisions is necessary.
So, a big block of concrete that has the US constitution etched in it with the caption ‘read it, you stupid bitches.’
Fucking ACB shills. Fuck off.
"Another moderate ivanka with a soft spot for immigration and women’s bullshit." .....couldn't have conjectured it better then that..Hope your wrong
I think her best shot was if Ginsburg retired or died last year or earlier this year. When Trump is re-elected and the houses are beefed up, he can choose anyone he wants. She may still get it, but other options become available as well.
i cant wait to see how many guys she sexually assualted in high school. or even better, she has a secret lesbian life lol
At this point, what difference does it make?
Let's see how the liberal mobs going to destroy a Hispanic woman now. Win-win for us!
Amy will Take away the shame! https://youtu.be/Dgy-aigFd84
https://youtu.be/XnaJIG91RaI
i love her, too
but if she sells us out in 2A like Roberts, i will be heartbroken
is there any indication that she is not strong on 2A?
i honestly dont know, but if she is weak on 2A, I'd like to know that.