It got ruled against on a technicality, but what "rule" or procedure is going to suddenly convince the lib judges that a president cant rescind a previous president's EO? Roberts didnt argue that. Is this what Soto was talking about? Would she actually flip the decision if the Trump administration "asked properly"?
It got ruled against on a technicality, but what "rule" or procedure is going to suddenly convince the lib judges that a president cant rescind a previous president's EO? Roberts didnt argue that. Is this what Soto was talking about? Would she actually flip the decision if the Trump administration "asked properly"?