That's good. Even if he doesn't...his staff definitely does and it's a way to gauge what the country think. I want something done about these motherfuckers ripping down statues of Washington and Jefferson.
Another issue I have and no one is brining it up, but I think it needs to be addressed. I fundamentally disagree with Obama's order to allow wamen in combat arms. If we didn't have a crazed left who viewed any inequality of outcome as a systematic ism and trying to correct by lowering standards for the out group..I'd be fine with that .but we don't live in that world. Men are on average much stronger than women. So since we can't have a mature acceptance that a true equity of opportunity standard will mean less than 5% of the military will be women, less than 1% will be leg infantry and less than .1-.01% will ever be special forces (depending on whether we're talking Rangers .1%, green berets or navy seals .01% or delta forces .0001%) then we aren't ready to allow women in combat arms. I for one am not willing to risk the lives of our fighting men and compromise our nation's security so the left can feel good that they forced some woman through lowered standards to get a title she didn't earn.
It is NEVER good to lower the standards. That means these Inferior women will be a liability on the battle field
Eventually these Inferior soldiers and Marines will get their fellow soldiers and Marines killed. Either they live up to the standards..which clearly they can't or they get the FUCK out of combat arms. It is my opinion that women have no place on the battlefield whatsoever.
That's good. Even if he doesn't...his staff definitely does and it's a way to gauge what the country think. I want something done about these motherfuckers ripping down statues of Washington and Jefferson.
Another issue I have and no one is brining it up, but I think it needs to be addressed. I fundamentally disagree with Obama's order to allow wamen in combat arms. If we didn't have a crazed left who viewed any inequality of outcome as a systematic ism and trying to correct by lowering standards for the out group..I'd be fine with that .but we don't live in that world. Men are on average much stronger than women. So since we can't have a mature acceptance that a true equity of opportunity standard will mean less than 5% of the military will be women, less than 1% will be leg infantry and less than .1-.01% will ever be special forces (depending on whether we're talking Rangers .1%, green berets or navy seals .01% or delta forces .0001%) then we aren't ready to allow women in combat arms. I for one am not willing to risk the lives of our fighting men and compromise our nation's security so the left can feel good that they forced some woman through lowered standards to get a title she didn't earn.
Do you have any examples of recent negative repercussions caused by women in combat?
The Marines did a study on combat readiness and found women can't hack it https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2016/08/12/female-marine-can-t-complete-infantry-officer-course-no-more-women-now-enrolled/
They quietly lowered the standards for women
www.military.com/daily-news/2018/02/11/marine-corps-quietly-drops-major-obstacle-female-infantry-officers.html/amp
It is NEVER good to lower the standards. That means these Inferior women will be a liability on the battle field
Eventually these Inferior soldiers and Marines will get their fellow soldiers and Marines killed. Either they live up to the standards..which clearly they can't or they get the FUCK out of combat arms. It is my opinion that women have no place on the battlefield whatsoever.