1385
Comments (43)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Eleutherian 2 points ago +3 / -1

if you are still using the confirmed case/death rate at 5% then you obviously have been willfully ignoring the multiple studies that have shown that cases are underrepresented by like what a factor of 50 or something...these studies have proven that a huge portion of the population have been 'infected' and just do not know it because they are asymptomatic, easily 15-25% of the entire population or something like that... until every single person in the US is tested and even that won't be accurate because they'd have to test for antibodies, that actual % can not be known; the death count is the most important and if you can't see the difference between 1k and 100k then you are bursting from the ears with the leftist kool-aid

0
Bomberman 0 points ago +1 / -1

That is fine. Say USA was underrepresented by 50x because of Cuomo's antibody studies. Japan will also be the same, underrepresented by 50x as well if they do antibody studies. But that's not what OP is trying to show. He said there was a discrepancy that proves some numbers were made up. So I'm trying to figure out how that was concluded.