I knew that much, still, a solid source would be nice. I was looking earlier and best I found was some nih pdf that you had to extrapolate figures yourself & even then it didn't seem quite that low... I've also heard Larry elder quote that figure, just never have seen a source
Yup, Tucker said in his segment that he was using the Washington Post database. Glad to see it’s still there, but we should really make a backup in case they take it down in the future for going against their narrative. If you press the year tag after setting race and weapon, you’ll also see that the killing of unarmed black people has gone down year after year from 38 in 2015 to just 14 in 2019. Meanwhile, the number of unarmed white people killed had only gone down from 32 to 25. These protesters are protesting over a complete lie.
Yeah, that was my first check. On mobile since my gpu bit the dust, so searching ain't easy & figured the people showing the info would have sauce already. Seems that the Washington post link is the most cited (yes i know that's fake news, just reporting what i'm hearing)
I would check CDC death statistics. They usually are a couple years behind but CDC tracks all death numbers. They are trying to remove the non agenda matching stats like “gun deaths via suicide” because that’s over half of them. Accidents are 5-7%. Then gang related are something like 20%. By the time you get down to non gang, non suicide, non justifiable self defense, you end up a single digit % of the ~33,000 annual gun deaths each year.
Cucked CDC wants to pump those rookie numbers up by attributing them all to “gun violence”. Hell, I’m sure they would like to say anytime someone died while owning a registered firearm that it counts as gun violence just like anyone dying from any cause during 2020 equals COVID
I'm more curious to know the difference between the lightning strikes against armed and unarmed people? Some of that lightning was shooting back to defend itself.
Overall, cops still kill a lot more whites, both armed and unarmed, than they kill blacks. It just doesn't make the national news when the criminal or the true victim of police excessive force (lethal or not) is white.
Actually, in Minneapolis, a black officer killed a white woman who was NOT a criminal, was NOT armed, was not interacting with the cop who shot her, and did absolutely NOTHING to make a cop shoot her.
If she had been black and the cop white, we all know what would have happened.
Yeup. For instance, where's this brigade talking about Daniel Shaver? Dude was just pulling his shorts up after being fucking told to crawl like a dog and Simon Says..... Oh, that's right. He's white. White Lives Don't Matter.
Usually goes down like this. White guy puts up a White Lives Matter sign, gets brigaded by a bunch of people calling him a white supremacist and that cops target black people en masse. Then you butt in and point out how crimes are committed at a disproportionate rate by black people, they call you a racist and that it's primarily poverty. Hell, you can literally agree with them that it is a poverty issue, not so much a race one, and you'll still be called a racist for supporting the white patriarchy. You point out that the problem is harder to fix than giving free money and that white people, adjusted for crime rates, are just as likely to beshot as a black person and how there were 14 in all of 2019 who were unarmed, and you're still a racist thanks to their first non-argument about cops targetting black people en masse.
I've been called a white supremacist online because I point out the irrationality. The funny thing is, I'm only 1/16th white. It's a circular argument you cannot win because they refuse to see they've already lost. Yes, you can believe that cops can be wrong as well as believing a police-hating ideology rooted in poverty is highly problematic. Part of rationality is understanding that two things can be both bad and true at the same damned time.
But BLM and Antifa, the latter being masked psychopaths with a saviour mentality who want to take claim to believing in the black cause by calling black dissenters literal "Uncle Toms", neither of these organizations really care. Otherwise, one wouldn't be torchingdown black neighbourhoods while the other sits and watches, all while amassing funds that by and large go to the organizer's paychecks with a vast minority going to actual community projects. What was it, like 5%? Bring up the fact that these organizations are literally taking advantage of the community and you're still a racist, though.
The Daniel Shaver video was truly shocking and upsetting.
The guy was NOT a criminal, was unarmed and perfectly obeying the cop. That cop was definitely on a power trip, screaming orders at an unarmed guy doing everything he was told, whimpering, and begging the cop not to shoot him, while the cop kept threatening to shoot him. Then, suddenly, the cop shoots his semi-automatic rifle at the guy for absolutely NO reason, and he ends up being found not guilty.
To add insult to injury, the killer, officer Brailsford, was reinstated to the Mesa Police Department for a month so he could be granted retirement on medical grounds, with a pension of $2,500 per month, because he claimed to suffer from "PTSD" due to him shooting Shaver and the criminal trial, which let him get away with senselessly murdering a man who hadn't committed any crime and was fully submitting to his power trip.
If Shaver had been a black guy, the leftists and black people would definitely claim racism, and there would have been riots when the victim was shot, when the cop was acquitted, and when he briefly got his job back as a cop to get a pretty decent retirement pension at the age of 28, because HE killed an unarmed, innocent man for no reason, and left his victim's widow and daughter without a husband, a father, and a provider. Shaver's family should get that pension; NOT the killer.
The Washington Post before they doctored the numbers after Tucker’s segment. Where you can find the most unbiased, accurate numbers comes from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
They have several PDFs breaking down LEOs being killed, criminal demographics, inmate demographics, etc. It’s the holy grail, I argue, of criminal numbers in America.
I'm not sure about this year or if that number means "unarmed black people". This site showed 9 unarmed black deaths for 2019 a couple weeks ago (Tucker even did a segment on it), but now it shows 23 unarmed black people. Looking for more sources...
Where's the best source for the 10 figure? That's like 5x less than being struck by lightning
It should read unarmed blacks killed by cops, they’ve killed plenty more that were shooting back.
Showing the unarmed stat makes more sense. When they claim "genocide" it's implying the police were going after them for simply being black.
Cases where death was wrongful in those is 2-4 out of 10. 2 are facing charges.
Yep
It should be better labelled, though. Don't give them a fucking SPLINTER of an opportunity to say we're not telling the truth.
Even saying "unarmed" is implying unjustified. An unarmed person can be very dangerous.
This is correct
I knew that much, still, a solid source would be nice. I was looking earlier and best I found was some nih pdf that you had to extrapolate figures yourself & even then it didn't seem quite that low... I've also heard Larry elder quote that figure, just never have seen a source
Yup, Tucker said in his segment that he was using the Washington Post database. Glad to see it’s still there, but we should really make a backup in case they take it down in the future for going against their narrative. If you press the year tag after setting race and weapon, you’ll also see that the killing of unarmed black people has gone down year after year from 38 in 2015 to just 14 in 2019. Meanwhile, the number of unarmed white people killed had only gone down from 32 to 25. These protesters are protesting over a complete lie.
Usually the FBI puts out crime statistics. Look there.
Yeah, that was my first check. On mobile since my gpu bit the dust, so searching ain't easy & figured the people showing the info would have sauce already. Seems that the Washington post link is the most cited (yes i know that's fake news, just reporting what i'm hearing)
I would check CDC death statistics. They usually are a couple years behind but CDC tracks all death numbers. They are trying to remove the non agenda matching stats like “gun deaths via suicide” because that’s over half of them. Accidents are 5-7%. Then gang related are something like 20%. By the time you get down to non gang, non suicide, non justifiable self defense, you end up a single digit % of the ~33,000 annual gun deaths each year.
Cucked CDC wants to pump those rookie numbers up by attributing them all to “gun violence”. Hell, I’m sure they would like to say anytime someone died while owning a registered firearm that it counts as gun violence just like anyone dying from any cause during 2020 equals COVID
Think Crowder cited the FBI for these numbers
I'm more curious to know the difference between the lightning strikes against armed and unarmed people? Some of that lightning was shooting back to defend itself.
Overall, cops still kill a lot more whites, both armed and unarmed, than they kill blacks. It just doesn't make the national news when the criminal or the true victim of police excessive force (lethal or not) is white.
Actually, in Minneapolis, a black officer killed a white woman who was NOT a criminal, was NOT armed, was not interacting with the cop who shot her, and did absolutely NOTHING to make a cop shoot her.
If she had been black and the cop white, we all know what would have happened.
Yeup. For instance, where's this brigade talking about Daniel Shaver? Dude was just pulling his shorts up after being fucking told to crawl like a dog and Simon Says..... Oh, that's right. He's white. White Lives Don't Matter.
Usually goes down like this. White guy puts up a White Lives Matter sign, gets brigaded by a bunch of people calling him a white supremacist and that cops target black people en masse. Then you butt in and point out how crimes are committed at a disproportionate rate by black people, they call you a racist and that it's primarily poverty. Hell, you can literally agree with them that it is a poverty issue, not so much a race one, and you'll still be called a racist for supporting the white patriarchy. You point out that the problem is harder to fix than giving free money and that white people, adjusted for crime rates, are just as likely to beshot as a black person and how there were 14 in all of 2019 who were unarmed, and you're still a racist thanks to their first non-argument about cops targetting black people en masse.
I've been called a white supremacist online because I point out the irrationality. The funny thing is, I'm only 1/16th white. It's a circular argument you cannot win because they refuse to see they've already lost. Yes, you can believe that cops can be wrong as well as believing a police-hating ideology rooted in poverty is highly problematic. Part of rationality is understanding that two things can be both bad and true at the same damned time.
But BLM and Antifa, the latter being masked psychopaths with a saviour mentality who want to take claim to believing in the black cause by calling black dissenters literal "Uncle Toms", neither of these organizations really care. Otherwise, one wouldn't be torchingdown black neighbourhoods while the other sits and watches, all while amassing funds that by and large go to the organizer's paychecks with a vast minority going to actual community projects. What was it, like 5%? Bring up the fact that these organizations are literally taking advantage of the community and you're still a racist, though.
Very true!
The Daniel Shaver video was truly shocking and upsetting. The guy was NOT a criminal, was unarmed and perfectly obeying the cop. That cop was definitely on a power trip, screaming orders at an unarmed guy doing everything he was told, whimpering, and begging the cop not to shoot him, while the cop kept threatening to shoot him. Then, suddenly, the cop shoots his semi-automatic rifle at the guy for absolutely NO reason, and he ends up being found not guilty.
To add insult to injury, the killer, officer Brailsford, was reinstated to the Mesa Police Department for a month so he could be granted retirement on medical grounds, with a pension of $2,500 per month, because he claimed to suffer from "PTSD" due to him shooting Shaver and the criminal trial, which let him get away with senselessly murdering a man who hadn't committed any crime and was fully submitting to his power trip.
If Shaver had been a black guy, the leftists and black people would definitely claim racism, and there would have been riots when the victim was shot, when the cop was acquitted, and when he briefly got his job back as a cop to get a pretty decent retirement pension at the age of 28, because HE killed an unarmed, innocent man for no reason, and left his victim's widow and daughter without a husband, a father, and a provider. Shaver's family should get that pension; NOT the killer.
The Washington Post before they doctored the numbers after Tucker’s segment. Where you can find the most unbiased, accurate numbers comes from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
https://bjs.gov/
They have several PDFs breaking down LEOs being killed, criminal demographics, inmate demographics, etc. It’s the holy grail, I argue, of criminal numbers in America.
I have to say it:
BJs for the win
I'm not sure about this year or if that number means "unarmed black people". This site showed 9 unarmed black deaths for 2019 a couple weeks ago (Tucker even did a segment on it), but now it shows 23 unarmed black people. Looking for more sources...
https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/nationaltrends
I believe it refers to unarmed blacks killed by coos.
Tucker did a whole breakdown a few weeks ago of every unarmed killing of a black person by a police officer in 2019. There were 10.