128
Comments (13)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
Ghostphaez 5 points ago +6 / -1

We are in a propaganda war with the Left, though, so tonight's low attendance is going to be milked for all it's worth by the Left to hype up their base and depress ours.

5
silent_majority_2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Low attendance? Don't let them say that because it's not true. I saw tons of people there on the stream plus a massive virtual turnout. If someone says low attendance make them prove it. For example this NBC article claims low attendance but doesn't offer any proof and instead shows pictures that make it looked packed: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-trump-s-tulsa-rally-no-distancing-few-masks-plenty-n1231654

1
Ghostphaez 1 point ago +4 / -3

Come on, don't spread conspiracy theories - it did have low attendance.

RSBN admitted it, Breitbart admitted it, even Parscale alluded to it: https://twitter.com/parscale/status/1274484815576907778

Hey, it happens and it's not a sign of the apocalypse - but let's not pretend that this wasn't a disappointment.

3
silent_majority_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

OK, I'm starting to see what you are talking about. I did find this article which mentions that physical attendance was lower than projected.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/20/reports-tulsa-rally-turnout-lower-than-expected/

As for what the left will do with this I cannot say myself. Yes they will will probably use it against Trump just like they for everything related to Trump even very minor things like that he drank water with two hands (to protect his tie but they don't tell that part).

We also have to take into account the virtual attendance which was massive.

-1
Ghostphaez -1 points ago +1 / -2

Brad Parscale also admitted it tonight - see his Twitter tonight.

And example: https://twitter.com/parscale/status/1274535619486797825