WaPo used to be fairly widely acknowledged as the CIA mouthpiece within the US, but I don't know if this still holds true.
Honestly, I wouldn't have thought CNN because they aren't that stupid or useless, but... If the past few years have taught me anything, it's that our three-letter agencies are staffed almost entirely by abject retards.
So yeah, I guess that the CIA would invest millions into a channel that only a few retirees and school teachers watch. (Their "reach" is almost entirely in airports and on CNN international: they're incredibly unpopular in the US.)
WaPo used to be fairly widely acknowledged as the CIA mouthpiece within the US, but I don't know if this still holds true.
Honestly, I wouldn't have thought CNN because they aren't that stupid or useless, but... If the past few years have taught me anything, it's that our three-letter agencies are staffed almost entirely by abject retards.
So yeah, I guess that the CIA would invest millions into a channel that only a few retirees and school teachers watch. (Their "reach" is almost entirely in airports and on CNN international: they're incredibly unpopular in the US.)