Even just "boobs," try it out, goto google, type in "boobs" and 3 clicks you have porn, on twitter, with no age verification.
With "porn" its 2 clicks to hardcore porn video, no verification.
and 1 click for "naked girl."
It is illegal for this content to be given to children. There is no reasonable control to prevent children from getting access to it. Its not the same as buying a magazine or renting a video. There needs to be some online ID, like an ID# + code generator for all content (like liquor sales and such). Its like if an adult video store simply put a sign that said "Take what you want no one under 18."
Correct - because you failed to provide any boundaries on the access you provided.
If you have smut in a drawer and don't lock it, it's one handle pull,
If you have the full cable package, you punch in one number.
Take responsibility. The only way to do what you suggest is to give up anonymity, which I unequivocally oppose. Not quite as hard line as 2a, but almost.
You're plan requires every adult in the country to be able to secure administrative rights on every device from smart tvs to phones and computers, to set those administrative controls, maintain up to date black lists for new sites, set up children accounts for all browsers on all phones, prevent installation of 3rd party browsers, to monitor children at public locations with computers (like libraries which don't block porn), and constantly monitor all activity because 1000 new sites are created every day, and to monitor activity on sites that are suppose to not be porn like reddit, youtube, facebook, or twitter.
That's a lot to ask every adult to do. I can not get a magazine, or I can not get porn cable channels. I know that the cable company or adult video store won't give hardcore porn to a 12 year old for free without any age verification.
Like the other guy said, this problem cannot be resolved without removing internet anonymity and also violating the freedom to choose that america was founded on. Removing anonymity is unwise, and would be worse for society than children having access to porn. The cure cannot be worse than the condition. Porn also cannot be removed without violating the freedom of speech, and the core fundamental aspect of American society to be free to choose even bad things. It is the liberals who want to limit our freedoms for the "greater good".
Given these two facts being what they are, this is not a battle to fight from the top town. As always it is a battle at the bottom level where the parents need to raise their children properly.
Even just "boobs," try it out, goto google, type in "boobs" and 3 clicks you have porn, on twitter, with no age verification.
With "porn" its 2 clicks to hardcore porn video, no verification.
and 1 click for "naked girl."
It is illegal for this content to be given to children. There is no reasonable control to prevent children from getting access to it. Its not the same as buying a magazine or renting a video. There needs to be some online ID, like an ID# + code generator for all content (like liquor sales and such). Its like if an adult video store simply put a sign that said "Take what you want no one under 18."
Correct - because you failed to provide any boundaries on the access you provided.
If you have smut in a drawer and don't lock it, it's one handle pull,
If you have the full cable package, you punch in one number.
Take responsibility. The only way to do what you suggest is to give up anonymity, which I unequivocally oppose. Not quite as hard line as 2a, but almost.
You're plan requires every adult in the country to be able to secure administrative rights on every device from smart tvs to phones and computers, to set those administrative controls, maintain up to date black lists for new sites, set up children accounts for all browsers on all phones, prevent installation of 3rd party browsers, to monitor children at public locations with computers (like libraries which don't block porn), and constantly monitor all activity because 1000 new sites are created every day, and to monitor activity on sites that are suppose to not be porn like reddit, youtube, facebook, or twitter.
That's a lot to ask every adult to do. I can not get a magazine, or I can not get porn cable channels. I know that the cable company or adult video store won't give hardcore porn to a 12 year old for free without any age verification.
Like the other guy said, this problem cannot be resolved without removing internet anonymity and also violating the freedom to choose that america was founded on. Removing anonymity is unwise, and would be worse for society than children having access to porn. The cure cannot be worse than the condition. Porn also cannot be removed without violating the freedom of speech, and the core fundamental aspect of American society to be free to choose even bad things. It is the liberals who want to limit our freedoms for the "greater good".
Given these two facts being what they are, this is not a battle to fight from the top town. As always it is a battle at the bottom level where the parents need to raise their children properly.