404
Comments (11)
sorted by:
7
Shitsbrokeyo 7 points ago +7 / -0

can you look up how many genders there are?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
VyseLegendaire 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just cross out the vaccines part. At best, vaccines allege to bring on natural immunity. There is no such thing as 'unnatural' immunity unless you are cybernetically enhanced.

3
Belleoffreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

For most viruses that attack humans, your only defenses are prevention and your own immune systems. Antibiotics don’t kill viruses, and scientists haven’t discovered many effective antiviral drugs.

Ultimately, the drugs and techniques we use are for the purpose of knocking back the viral population enough to allow the immune system to finish it off. This is exactly how antibiotics also work.

Antiviral drugs that can be used to good effect include Tamiflu. Zinc plus an ionophore, such as hydroxychloroquine or quercetin. Retrovirus inhibitors, protease inhibitors, selenium, Vitamin C, Vitamin D.

For cleaning surfaces: hydrogen peroxide, isopropyl alcohol, UV light sources. These will all rapidly kill viruses of many types.

For cleaning air: UV air scrubbers

Molecular and Cell Biology for Dummies is for dummies. The quotes as used promote unlearned helplessness.

Tyler Durden does not understand what he writes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-5
freewillsetstruth -5 points ago +2 / -7

Viruses aren't pathogenic. There is not one single scientific experiment that has ever proven that they are. "Studies" aren't science. Causation isn't correlation. Your books are wrong.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
0
VyseLegendaire 0 points ago +1 / -1

On his death bed Louis Pasteur said "its all terrain and none of it is pathogens". Well, there isn't known proof he said it but its pretty clear that his theory lacks corroboration even today.
http://www.susandoreydesigns.com/insights/pasteur-recant.html

1
BamaDiver75 1 point ago +1 / -0

His theory lacks corroboration? You mean the theory that bacteria and viruses cause disease?

You can’t be serious, right?

2
Belleoffreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

We get nuts, here.

2
VyseLegendaire 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is great doubt about it. If you just take the simple fact that most disease occur with 2 conditions;

  1. the presence of the selected pathogen
  2. lack of immune strength or immune deficiency as a result of lacking either A. The needed nutrition and vitamins/minerals to effectively combat invading disease and B. Environmental factors damaging the body's immune function (for instance, external drug or toxic aluminum intake or nuclear radiation, chemicals)

If you need both to occur, then it by definition cannot be the case that pathogens themselves cause disease, thus negating the assertion that they are automatically pathogenic.