the problem with hannity is the tone he uses. i've recently pinned it down in my head what is so wrong with him, besides his constant interruptions. it's that he is 100% always dialed in at 11 with this kind of lecturing tone of voice. it's a strained thing going on with his vocal chords, like pitched up, where he's lecturing. the thing that's so wrong about it is, you use something like that for EMPHASIS. he just does it non-stop through the whole show and it's fatiguing to listen to.
by comparison Dobbs is cool as a cucumber, says all the right things, and only when driving his points home does he lay on just the right, perfect amount of snark and maybe even his trademark smirk. it's beautiful and often hilarious. he's such a pro. he puts out more fire with a tiny smirk and his subtle snark delivery than hannity does with all his over the top constant lecturing. pathetic.
Hannity's whole shtick is persuasion by repitition
the problem with hannity is the tone he uses. i've recently pinned it down in my head what is so wrong with him, besides his constant interruptions. it's that he is 100% always dialed in at 11 with this kind of lecturing tone of voice. it's a strained thing going on with his vocal chords, like pitched up, where he's lecturing. the thing that's so wrong about it is, you use something like that for EMPHASIS. he just does it non-stop through the whole show and it's fatiguing to listen to.
by comparison Dobbs is cool as a cucumber, says all the right things, and only when driving his points home does he lay on just the right, perfect amount of snark and maybe even his trademark smirk. it's beautiful and often hilarious. he's such a pro. he puts out more fire with a tiny smirk and his subtle snark delivery than hannity does with all his over the top constant lecturing. pathetic.