Idk for sure, but I would imagine a legitimate exception is made when that officer or agent is under duress.
You see it a lot in police videos, shit is going down and some moron tries to demand name and badge number, while they’re wrestling on the ground or something.
I did a little bit of searching, and what I found was that there are few (if any?) LAWS requiring officers to identify themselves. There are departmental policies which say they have to, but they don't face any legal action from refusing. Additionally, the answers I found dealt with local law enforcement, not federal agents.
Based baton dude is based. Listen to them REEEEE haha fucking losers.
This is the nicest face they’re going to see.
Once it’s all vigilantes, the stomping will commence.
At this point, I can't wait. I'd pay to watch. Roll the bikers in and let the games begin.
Yup way ahead of ya.
I'm. All. In.
Fuck around and find out.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Legitimate question - are local, state, and or federal officers required by law to give identifying information when asked?
Idk for sure, but I would imagine a legitimate exception is made when that officer or agent is under duress.
You see it a lot in police videos, shit is going down and some moron tries to demand name and badge number, while they’re wrestling on the ground or something.
I did a little bit of searching, and what I found was that there are few (if any?) LAWS requiring officers to identify themselves. There are departmental policies which say they have to, but they don't face any legal action from refusing. Additionally, the answers I found dealt with local law enforcement, not federal agents.
No federal requirement, some local areas have policy that they must. For seizures and some undercover work it some times is required.