I'm an attorney and that letter is terrible + it doesn't matter if you "AT NO TIME DID I TELL IT WAS A CONFIDENTIAL CONVERSATION" you'd still have your ass handed to you by the ethics board
I don't think it's actually clear. It's not explicitly stated in the letter that they intend to commit crimes.
HOWEVER
You can read between the lines and the reasoning given is so fucking retarded it would not be possible for someone that clinically retarded to be even finishing high school let alone even a standard university course even if it's on of the courses for the average joe rather than the above average intellect.
It simply CANNOT be sincere. It's blatant they're not afraid of being mistaken for antifa or rioters. This is also called being a shitty liar, the way it's written is filled with tells.
Standards might have slipped today but that's not what I would call well crafted.
However there is an intent which it does achieve.
It's not incompatible with what might be expected of a 19 year old.
However again statements such as about being a "long time" supporter of BLM did make me feel uncertain of the age assuming it's not contrived.
The low quality of the writing in some places is questionable. It's not the level I would expect of a college student.
There are strange mannerisms in the email that I can't explain. These appear contrived and further reduce its authenticity.
Google for "finds you in good regards" and there's only 5 results. Wouldn't even surprise me if one of those wrote the letter.
The only thing that really comes up for that bizarre turn of phrase is a legal troll going after website accessibility which fits the bill. Also perhaps a lawyer dispute of some kind I can't be bothered to look into.
I think it's possibly related somehow this lawyer who has been outed for malpractice:
Rosales, an attorney, sent letters to several healthcare facilities claiming that their websites did not meet the requirements of the Americans With Disabilities Act. He also attached a proposed lawsuit that he said he was going to file against them unless they paid him $2,000. He signed the letters “O. Rosales Attorney at Law ceo.cenvetaccess.org”. Several of the providers filed grievances against Rosales with the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Council of the State Bar of Texas. Eventually, the State Bar filed suit against Rosales in the Travis County District Court. Rosales filed a motion to dismiss under the Texas anti-SLAPP, TCPA, law. The State Bar responded that the TCPA did not apply to lawyer disciplinary proceedings and even if it did, they met their burden to show by clear and specific evidence a prima facie case for each essential element of the claim. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the claim by the State Bar. The State Bar appealed.
Here is a sample of the troll emails they were sending:
Dear Clinic Director:
I hope this letter finds you in good regards. Enclosed is a copy of the Federal lawsuit to be filed in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, against your clinic. This lawsuit alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title 42 U.S.C. §12101 and §12181 (known as the "ADA") that occur on your company's website.
As you are aware, the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites. Disabled individuals have the right to access and obtain information about medical clinics, doctor's offices, and urgent care centers. Disabled individuals, such as myself, use these websites to obtain and book suitable medical treatment. Under Federal law, your website must comply with the new requirements of the ADA and WCAG 2.0 AA (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines).
I have completed a survey of your website for ADA compliance. Your website failed. I have attached the ADA review of your website that lists the areas where your site is not in compliance with Federal law and Title III of the ADA.
In addition, to receive Federal funds through Medicaid, Medicare, and the Children's Health Insurance Partnership (CHIP), you have agreed to comply with all Federal Rules and Regulations. Since your website does not comply with Federal law, you must immediately self-report to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and forfeit any Federal funds received until you have completed recertification.
Our Initial Demand to settle this unfiled lawsuit is $2000. Should you refuse to enter settlement negotiations, I will have no choice but to file the attached lawsuit against your company. I will also contact DHHS and discuss the possibility of a separate civil suit under Qui Tam doctrine to obtain reimbursement of Federal Tax dollars that you improperly obtained from the government. Please contact me, so that we may resolve these issues.
Sincerely,
/s/ O. Rosales
O. Rosales
Attorney-at-law
ceo.cenvetaccess.org
Imagine being such a fucking idiot corrupt incompetent lawyer that you send the same unique intro in all your scam emails even when trying to hide your identity that anyone can just think who the fuck says that is that a normal thing to say I think I'll google that.
It could be coincidence but I find it very suspect.
That lawyers letter is shit. I suspect both were written by the same person as both are written with similar grammatical structure and typos. Only a really shitty attorney would ever consider sending an all caps message to any government agency or official as the CAPS immediately denote non-professional authorship. This feels like it belongs in ‘things that didn’t happen’ category.
Exactly. What is the FBI supposed to do with this?
Here is what the letter says:
“Hey, FBI, someone said they are worried the government might violate their rights or the rights of their friends and they asked if I would offer pro bono assistance if that fear comes to fruition.”
Even if we assume everything here is true this is the sort of thing Van Jones would classify as a nothing burger.
Wow that's one amazing lawyer. I bet everyone clapped.
Yeah this letter is not something he'd have to write in secret or act like this.
He could literally contact federal law enforcement about out of state actors who approached him seeking his services with whom he had no attorney-client relationship at that point and who is seeking his services in aid to evade consequences for the commencement of criminal acts.
In several states he is professionally REQUIRED to report any such plans to commit a crime for which the prospective client desires to engage his services.
Sorry, but that is not the kind of letter lawyers of any stripe write when reporting potential criminal activity.
Yea having worked for a PI form for 5 years that wasn’t written by a lawyer. It’s photoshopped
I'm an attorney and that letter is terrible + it doesn't matter if you "AT NO TIME DID I TELL IT WAS A CONFIDENTIAL CONVERSATION" you'd still have your ass handed to you by the ethics board
The grammar and word choice is wrong in a few places. I imagine that’s not the kind of mistake a lawyer makes.
Lawyers can make mistakes. This is not simply a letter with mistakes. The whole thing is a nightmare.
BASED RULES NERD
"rules nerd" kek
Just loving the USA and doing the laws.
Can we start calling decent, God-fearing, America-loving lawyers "rules nerds" instead?
I don't think it's actually clear. It's not explicitly stated in the letter that they intend to commit crimes.
HOWEVER
You can read between the lines and the reasoning given is so fucking retarded it would not be possible for someone that clinically retarded to be even finishing high school let alone even a standard university course even if it's on of the courses for the average joe rather than the above average intellect.
It simply CANNOT be sincere. It's blatant they're not afraid of being mistaken for antifa or rioters. This is also called being a shitty liar, the way it's written is filled with tells.
This was a well crafted letter. I doubt it's authored by a 19 or 20 year old.
Standards might have slipped today but that's not what I would call well crafted.
However there is an intent which it does achieve.
It's not incompatible with what might be expected of a 19 year old.
However again statements such as about being a "long time" supporter of BLM did make me feel uncertain of the age assuming it's not contrived.
The low quality of the writing in some places is questionable. It's not the level I would expect of a college student.
There are strange mannerisms in the email that I can't explain. These appear contrived and further reduce its authenticity.
Google for "finds you in good regards" and there's only 5 results. Wouldn't even surprise me if one of those wrote the letter.
The only thing that really comes up for that bizarre turn of phrase is a legal troll going after website accessibility which fits the bill. Also perhaps a lawyer dispute of some kind I can't be bothered to look into.
I think it's possibly related somehow this lawyer who has been outed for malpractice:
Here is a sample of the troll emails they were sending:
Imagine being such a fucking idiot corrupt incompetent lawyer that you send the same unique intro in all your scam emails even when trying to hide your identity that anyone can just think who the fuck says that is that a normal thing to say I think I'll google that.
It could be coincidence but I find it very suspect.
cool story.
MAGA lawyers are the best lawyers.
Source?
This is apparently from the blue leaks data leak. Found it on reddit.
Why the caps? And serious, they want FREE legal services? Fuck these people for so many reasons...
That lawyers letter is shit. I suspect both were written by the same person as both are written with similar grammatical structure and typos. Only a really shitty attorney would ever consider sending an all caps message to any government agency or official as the CAPS immediately denote non-professional authorship. This feels like it belongs in ‘things that didn’t happen’ category.
Kind of what I was thinking - you’d also think the letter would be a bit more professional.
Exactly. What is the FBI supposed to do with this?
Here is what the letter says:
“Hey, FBI, someone said they are worried the government might violate their rights or the rights of their friends and they asked if I would offer pro bono assistance if that fear comes to fruition.”
Even if we assume everything here is true this is the sort of thing Van Jones would classify as a nothing burger.
All caps provides fewer identifiable habits in the lawyer's writing. Making him/her more anonymous.
I suppose that makes sense.
Get what you pay for.
fake. come on people.
Photoshopped. Look at the crease on the purpose of rioting. The letters do t have a crease but the paper does? GAKE NEWS
The second page is another example of some idiot scanning in a blank paper background and then adding text over it.
Genius. Should t have given away her card though. If that would've been legal and ethical. If not, way to go!
Fake news folks. Fake news
I want to see some harsh prison sentences handed down the these fuckers.
FBI is more likely to spend resources to destroy this attorney than arrest antifa
Sauce?
Blue leaks data
Hmmm... its still sketch, but I have no doubt this is and how its all going down.
I don't know. In theory you could download the entire archive and find it. This is just the high-level of it from someone else's research.
Wow that's one amazing lawyer. I bet everyone clapped.
Yeah this letter is not something he'd have to write in secret or act like this.
He could literally contact federal law enforcement about out of state actors who approached him seeking his services with whom he had no attorney-client relationship at that point and who is seeking his services in aid to evade consequences for the commencement of criminal acts.
In several states he is professionally REQUIRED to report any such plans to commit a crime for which the prospective client desires to engage his services.