they allied them selvs with Iran and the drug cartels. They started "fake" "civilian" airlines that they use to smuggle drugs, slaves and ISIS fighters into the USA and Canada. Venezuela gives the ISIS people South American "real" Identification so they can travel into North America easily.
It might be Cletus and Jamal. But the media (Scribes) and the ruling body( pharasis) that will convincem to destroy the middle class and growers in order to make the average person beg for food and meager currency to survive. And when that does not bresk their spirit they will send maruaders to loot the suburbs.
Then most of the looters and their allys will be killed as a precaution. The nee zealots will be given titles, medals and badges for their allegiance. They cycle down starys over and over again.
But silly them, they do npt know how much we have studied the past, how clearly we can see their game.
Imagine being such a closet racist that you think a hood rat is someone of a specific race, and not some low life type of person that lives in the hood.
Get fucked idiot, you're like those libtards who blame all white people because one white guy has killed kneeled on another guy.
Insulting people of a whole continent because of one anonymous user who might have been from literally everywhere in the planet? Or you think people post on here only during office hours?
The OP is wrong in saying that people unite by social class. That's a Marxist fantasy.
People identify themselves much, much more with race and nationality. There's no way Jamal and Cletus won't kill each other long before they think of going after the champagne socialist.
That's the theory behind National Socialism/Fascism. Hitler believed people would unite under race. Mussolini believed people would unite under shared culture.
Marx/Lenin, and others in 20th century orthodox Socialists believed people would unite under class.
During the 10s through 30s, many nations had competing authoritarian revolutions. Russia had the White Movement versus the Red Movement. Spain had the Republicans versus the Nationalists. China had the Communists versus the Nationalists.
In the early days, there was a lot of overlap between the orthodox Socialists (Communists), and the National Socialist movements. And later, a lot of bloodshed between the two as they fought for absolute power.
In any case, Communist or Fascist. They are not your friends. For a nation to be free, free men must resist both.
Good post on the rise of authoritarian rulers, but there's a vital piece that should be added: the role of anarchists.
All of this followed a massive anarchist movement between 1860s and 1920s that was meant to destabilize and foment rebellion. This included a spate of assassinations of world leaders (President McKinley included), major industrialists, and other public figures. Gavrilo Princip was one of these anarchists... You might remember him as Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassin. The incident that lit the powder keg of Europe and began World War I.
The BLM/Antifa riots are direct heirs of this movement and must be dealt with swiftly and with overwhelming force.
Your post acknowledged various Marxist schools of thought/theory, but without the general chaos and unease fostered by anarchists, Marxism would not have had the fertile soil of grow.
There's a lot more to be said about this anarchist movement, but I suggest looking up "propaganda of the deed" as a starting point. Then look at the ties between anarchists and communists that develop around the 1890s.
Thanks. I'll be honest, I'm less familiar with the late 19th and early 20th century anarchist movements. I'll need to look up one of these days to find out why they were so attractive.
It's quite alright. Most high school history teachers don't know anything about this period of time, so anyone with an American public school background (unless they have a history background, degree, or an unnatural interest in the 19th century) would know even less.
Anarchy, itself, was not broadly attractive or popular outside of the usual malcontents. However, it was effective due to the reactions and fear it elicited in people. I mean, who the hell wants to anger people willing to set bombs while they're in range? No one. At least not before modern medicine and security...
It could be argued that Singapore, pre-1987 Taiwan, pre-1987 South Korea, and current Mainland China are all Fascist nations.
But why does Liberty deprive you of the Freedom to serve? Feel free to preach the Bible, join the military, work in a soup kitchens. There is no compulsion for you to maximize your income.
People identify themselves much, much more with race and nationality. >
True. I was trying to think of a multiracial or multinational country where communism was introduced. All I could think of was Yugoslavia. And we all know how that turned out.
I should point out that leftists believe that the wealthy will have nowhere in the world to run supposedly because of fellow leftists in other countries.
Churchill was always going on about this, about the inherently expansive tendencies of communism, how we had to remain ever vigilant in rooting it out. He was a big influence on the containment strategy of the US. The only mistake we've made is letting our guard down. Vietnam was a mess, but it was a virtuous war and we should never apologize for it.
Socialist faggots are too thick and stupid to look towards history. The closest thing to history that these leftist losers know is Harry Potter and the MCU
Since our education has gone to shit, nobody knows anything except some general ideas about Nazis, but we're about 6 steps into a Bolshevik/communist wave of terror, including censorship, intimidation and erasing history.
No guns there. Unless you belong to FARC who are currently trying to smuggle weapons in.
they allied them selvs with Iran and the drug cartels. They started "fake" "civilian" airlines that they use to smuggle drugs, slaves and ISIS fighters into the USA and Canada. Venezuela gives the ISIS people South American "real" Identification so they can travel into North America easily.
It might be Cletus and Jamal. But the media (Scribes) and the ruling body( pharasis) that will convincem to destroy the middle class and growers in order to make the average person beg for food and meager currency to survive. And when that does not bresk their spirit they will send maruaders to loot the suburbs.
Then most of the looters and their allys will be killed as a precaution. The nee zealots will be given titles, medals and badges for their allegiance. They cycle down starys over and over again.
But silly them, they do npt know how much we have studied the past, how clearly we can see their game.
Race Card Drivers are the worst
Imagine being such a closet racist that you think a hood rat is someone of a specific race, and not some low life type of person that lives in the hood.
Get fucked idiot, you're like those libtards who blame all white people because one white guy has
killedkneeled on another guy.Insulting people of a whole continent because of one anonymous user who might have been from literally everywhere in the planet? Or you think people post on here only during office hours?
Are you sure it wasn't your wife's boyfriend?
Yes. I'm literally shaking right now
Europe is hours ahead.
Can you even find Europe in a map?
To be fair guys, northern Italians can be pretty damn based.
Half the country see this the other half doesn’t.
So I work air cargo right now. We are flying fish from China into the US for a company called Hunan Fish Forever.
Always buy American
Nun hun. I’m going to be a socialist leader because I supported Bernie and aoc. See I even have a Che Guevara tee shirt
The OP is wrong in saying that people unite by social class. That's a Marxist fantasy.
People identify themselves much, much more with race and nationality. There's no way Jamal and Cletus won't kill each other long before they think of going after the champagne socialist.
That's the theory behind National Socialism/Fascism. Hitler believed people would unite under race. Mussolini believed people would unite under shared culture.
Marx/Lenin, and others in 20th century orthodox Socialists believed people would unite under class.
During the 10s through 30s, many nations had competing authoritarian revolutions. Russia had the White Movement versus the Red Movement. Spain had the Republicans versus the Nationalists. China had the Communists versus the Nationalists.
In the early days, there was a lot of overlap between the orthodox Socialists (Communists), and the National Socialist movements. And later, a lot of bloodshed between the two as they fought for absolute power.
In any case, Communist or Fascist. They are not your friends. For a nation to be free, free men must resist both.
Good post, thank you.
Good post on the rise of authoritarian rulers, but there's a vital piece that should be added: the role of anarchists.
All of this followed a massive anarchist movement between 1860s and 1920s that was meant to destabilize and foment rebellion. This included a spate of assassinations of world leaders (President McKinley included), major industrialists, and other public figures. Gavrilo Princip was one of these anarchists... You might remember him as Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassin. The incident that lit the powder keg of Europe and began World War I.
The BLM/Antifa riots are direct heirs of this movement and must be dealt with swiftly and with overwhelming force.
Your post acknowledged various Marxist schools of thought/theory, but without the general chaos and unease fostered by anarchists, Marxism would not have had the fertile soil of grow.
There's a lot more to be said about this anarchist movement, but I suggest looking up "propaganda of the deed" as a starting point. Then look at the ties between anarchists and communists that develop around the 1890s.
Thanks. I'll be honest, I'm less familiar with the late 19th and early 20th century anarchist movements. I'll need to look up one of these days to find out why they were so attractive.
It's quite alright. Most high school history teachers don't know anything about this period of time, so anyone with an American public school background (unless they have a history background, degree, or an unnatural interest in the 19th century) would know even less.
Anarchy, itself, was not broadly attractive or popular outside of the usual malcontents. However, it was effective due to the reactions and fear it elicited in people. I mean, who the hell wants to anger people willing to set bombs while they're in range? No one. At least not before modern medicine and security...
Nationalist Spain, the one supported by the Fascists, won the Spanish Civil war.
You can see how things played out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francoist_Spain
It could be argued that Singapore, pre-1987 Taiwan, pre-1987 South Korea, and current Mainland China are all Fascist nations.
But why does Liberty deprive you of the Freedom to serve? Feel free to preach the Bible, join the military, work in a soup kitchens. There is no compulsion for you to maximize your income.
True. I was trying to think of a multiracial or multinational country where communism was introduced. All I could think of was Yugoslavia. And we all know how that turned out.
Commissar Jamal?
Reminds me of the plot of The Turner Diaries.
I should point out that leftists believe that the wealthy will have nowhere in the world to run supposedly because of fellow leftists in other countries.
(no joke I've seen them claim this)
It's not a joke. Communism is meant to be a worldwide revolution.
Churchill was always going on about this, about the inherently expansive tendencies of communism, how we had to remain ever vigilant in rooting it out. He was a big influence on the containment strategy of the US. The only mistake we've made is letting our guard down. Vietnam was a mess, but it was a virtuous war and we should never apologize for it.
Race tension has always been a distraction from class tension.
This is eight years old.
It's even more relevant today!
Socialist faggots are too thick and stupid to look towards history. The closest thing to history that these leftist losers know is Harry Potter and the MCU
Since our education has gone to shit, nobody knows anything except some general ideas about Nazis, but we're about 6 steps into a Bolshevik/communist wave of terror, including censorship, intimidation and erasing history.