1002
Comments (34)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
28
Mrs_Fonebone [S] 28 points ago +30 / -2

Judge Sullivan has to eat it and the Amicus was bullshit.

12
Rainman 12 points ago +12 / -0

LOVE THE COMMENTS ON TWITTER! SO MUCH SALT!

4
0095D 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are, apparently, still "options" in that Sullivan can try to take this to the supreme court. Considering how bad Obama and his merry band of faggots want Flynn slapped with anything, I wouldn't be surprised if this gets dragged out for six or more months.

Huh... guess I heard wrong.

3
Mrs_Fonebone [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

The Judge cannot do so and the Amicus was declared void.

4
LeftistsAreInsane 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct. Sullivan does not appear to have any right to seek review en banc or before the Supreme Court. Imagine if every time you beat a trial judge on an appeal or a writ, he decided "fuck you, I'm going to get even" and tried to challenge the appellate court with his own further appeal/writ.

1
GlimGlamIsBestPone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine that the prosecution drops their case against an innocent man, but the judge decides to play god and keep the man a prisoner and find his own prosecutor to lay charges?

I’m not ruling anything out in clown world.