Thanks for explaining, it's interesting to read your perspective.
In regards to the 'cultural Marxists' of today, isn't their goal to bring down the structures of society so that there can be anarchy, and then socialism replaces the existing system?
Has not the same methods been used in Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela etc where the bolsheviks have destroyed society, erased history, culture, art etc during 'cultural revolutions' etc?
In my opinion they are completely different things.
Lenin / Stalin etc. produced a viable, strong society. Russia went from being one of the poorest countries in the planet with wooden plows to become the second superpower on earth with nukes.
The reason people must reject their model is 3fold: suppression of individual freedom, economically less efficient, and obviously the risk that the central authority kills millions of people either for political reasons (Stalin) or simply for stupidity (Mao).
However, it is a model for a strong society. The USSR had strong borders, nationalism, focus on STEM, family and procreation, and strong incentives to work (i.e. if you're not productive you end up in the gulags).
Cultural Marxism is not building a different society: it's a destructive force with the only goal of destroying society from inside. How can you based a society on being a non-binary gender fluid Muslim tranny with brown skin? Will people in positions of power be chosen because of their sexuality? What happens if someone doesn't want to work? Can 1 billion Africans move in? How is the economy organised exactly? How do you protect your society against foreign influences?
They don't really say. Cultural Marxism wants to destroy, not build. It's a weapon, not an alternative system.
If America turns into anarchy there's no telling who will prevail. Perhaps we'll become an islamic caliphate: LGBT and drug addicts will be thrown off the roofs. Perhaps we'll become Nazis: LGBT and drug addicts will be gassed.
In any case: if you're in mental anguish looking at your body in the mirror, don't know which bathroom to choose, eat soy and not steak, think lifting weights is for right wing gym rats, you have a bunch of mental illnesses, and you're terrified of guns: you really should not want anarchy or any kind of revolution. Libtards and SJWs are going towards self destruction.
Thanks for explaining, it's interesting to read your perspective.
In regards to the 'cultural Marxists' of today, isn't their goal to bring down the structures of society so that there can be anarchy, and then socialism replaces the existing system?
Has not the same methods been used in Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela etc where the bolsheviks have destroyed society, erased history, culture, art etc during 'cultural revolutions' etc?
In my opinion they are completely different things.
Lenin / Stalin etc. produced a viable, strong society. Russia went from being one of the poorest countries in the planet with wooden plows to become the second superpower on earth with nukes.
The reason people must reject their model is 3fold: suppression of individual freedom, economically less efficient, and obviously the risk that the central authority kills millions of people either for political reasons (Stalin) or simply for stupidity (Mao).
However, it is a model for a strong society. The USSR had strong borders, nationalism, focus on STEM, family and procreation, and strong incentives to work (i.e. if you're not productive you end up in the gulags).
Cultural Marxism is not building a different society: it's a destructive force with the only goal of destroying society from inside. How can you based a society on being a non-binary gender fluid Muslim tranny with brown skin? Will people in positions of power be chosen because of their sexuality? What happens if someone doesn't want to work? Can 1 billion Africans move in? How is the economy organised exactly? How do you protect your society against foreign influences?
They don't really say. Cultural Marxism wants to destroy, not build. It's a weapon, not an alternative system.
If America turns into anarchy there's no telling who will prevail. Perhaps we'll become an islamic caliphate: LGBT and drug addicts will be thrown off the roofs. Perhaps we'll become Nazis: LGBT and drug addicts will be gassed. In any case: if you're in mental anguish looking at your body in the mirror, don't know which bathroom to choose, eat soy and not steak, think lifting weights is for right wing gym rats, you have a bunch of mental illnesses, and you're terrified of guns: you really should not want anarchy or any kind of revolution. Libtards and SJWs are going towards self destruction.