The reason feminists won killing the intact family is that they first changed the civil laws in divorce court by criminalizing and bankrupting the father.
If the father disagrees with automatically losing his children to a four day a month "visitation schedule;" lose 18 years of his income; and, lose most his assets, THEN he will be dragged into court so many times while potentially being accused of domestic violence that he will lose his job and have to wait 2 years to get the violence charge expunged to find another good job, and other things.
Dr Warren Farrell explains this to Dr Jordan Peterson. Dr Farrell was a leader of the women's movement until he started to support children, then feminists cancelled him.
After family, feminists moved to employment then leadership positions in academics, entertainment, church, legal system, politics, media, FORTUNE 1,000 companies, and other things.
Feminist have a history of success in changing culture and laws.
What's the end game? Name it? Explain what the plan is front to back with the in between steps. Spell it out because I have no idea. Everyone just keeps saying "the jews" "I know right? Jews lol" "yes i agree jeeeews"
Explain this. Please. Anyone
I dont want a link to someone's 40000 word dissertation I want a nice tidy summary broken down with logic and historic examples.
I got a beautiful one from another poster explaining why he himself was suspicious, but he wasn't ready to call it a global conspiracy against our womenfolk
A -- islam is still not our friend 🙄
B -- women CAN be stupid. Dont make excuses by giving out an unquantifiable get out of jail free card
(Its not you specifically. This is a reply to all the other posts on this thread too)
Western societies have always treated their women like children. And by that I mean that hardly any of them had to ever live with the consequences of their actions and decisions. It only became a problem when they started treading them like superior beings.
Can't get my head around people who simultaneously argue that black people can be physically stronger and faster genetically, but somehow intelligence isn't genetic.
It's proven true, that some races are more intelligent than others.
Dealing with the real world is the whole point. No one can force me to pay for a woman I have to choose to. And since they are all turning into leftist puppets that cheat and steal from
It's no coincidence. The HR dept is the one that controls behaviour. It's the most parental of all departments including the CEO while being harder to push back against than any
other department, and having the most direct influence over whether you keep your job even over your own team and supers
As my grandfather often said, workplaces fell apart when the Personnel Office became "Human Resources". Personnel are people. Resources are objects intended to be exploited. In most cases, the feminists and liberals used HR as the foot in the door and created a lot of chaos for the rest of us.
Bingo, in fact, if your aren't one of these little snowflakes you can't be gainfully employed in the HR industry.
By the way....the invention of the HR department is one of the single biggest contributors to the 'woke' corporations today.
Most employment I have obtained, I have had to go around HR with insiders just to get past their filtering. Basically, have an advocate inside the company at manager or director level that mandates that you are the proper hire over some other person who 'ticks' the right boxes for diversity, background, etc. It's true.
In the old days, hiring was handled directly by the managers. They would then decide which candidate would be the best fit for their team.
Now, you don't even get to speak to a manager unless you're screened by the cat lady in HR. And she's going to reject people for ideological reasons because she doesn't know the intricacies and needs of each department in the company. How the fuck is a gender studies major going to know who is the best candidate for a mechanical engineering position?
EXACTLY. We need to start a banner movement with 'Out with HR,' or 'HR is Cancer,' or something...really, if anyone just stops for a second and considers how they operate, they would be forced to say 'Huh, gee, you're right! What in the hell were we thinking?...when did we surrender business decisions on hire over to some pseudo-intellectual, cultist and feminist group of people?'
It doesn't have to be a nefarious thing
HR departments are frequently the ones who write job postings and as one might expect, they dont necessarily know what they should even be looking for
Must know javascript
Must know python
Must know c++
Must know html 5
Must be a photoshop animation wizard!
A programmer is going to likely know 3 of those max it's probably not photoshop. If it is, it ain't animation. These are all "4 year degrees" if you will
(I'm a designer. I see this kind of stuff all the time if I'm looking for a contract etc)
The most observant part of this image post is the fact that they automatically view everyone as equal. Not in terms of rights, but in terms of morals and goals. They are stupid and brainwashed.
Their father, and yes some have known fathers, who "want the best for their daughter," and won't let her marry and have kids early because "he wants more for her than that," is a hidden problem.
Their mother, who also wants the daughter to "do more with her life than she did" is another problem. She ends up denying her daughter the very thing she herself has. A child.
If both parents would have a fit if the young woman married and got pregnant, you are going to have a single woman. With huge student loan, often.
Every month that a single person, male or female, survives, and is still single at the end of, is another living proof to that person that being single is survivable. Every month is another experience that the known thing, the familiar, being single, may be better than the scary unknown, being married.
Look around at the young people you know and make matches.
Then don't just leave them to their devices, stay on it, and ask them if it's going OK, and explain and explain to them, how to adjust, be flexible, talk things out, and develop patience, with this other being.
Children cement marriage.
Having children, fast, prevents the man from seeing the new wife as his property and his pleasure pal. All for him. If you let that happen, he may resent eventual children as taking her attention away from him.
And the men who indulge and amuse women who are like the photo, when she takes that hat off and dresses nicely, are part of the problem. They are not standing up for their rights to children. They are not going to get children anyplace else.
Women trade in attention; this is an inherent aspect of their evolutionary biologically-driven behavior. The mass-market for attention that digital platforms represent is a hugely addicting drug, and consequently, a huge distraction for young women. While the number of men they appear to attract with this digital net is massive, and the influence their perceive themselves to have over their "followers" and likers of posts is (in a sense) real, there's no substance to these false virtual relationships. Unless E-girls start marrying simp OnlyFans followers in order to creating stable, loving families and prove me wrong, of course.
As someone who spends too much time on YouTube, I can tell you that they'll sneak in recommendations which are very much the opposite of what you have expressed interest in and these spurious recommendations almost always lean left.
They have actually done studies that show the female of any species can find a mate (short term). Men...not so much. What I'm saying is any woman can find a man to fuck her in literally no time.
Except that they can't actually get any of these men to commit to relationships with them. It's literally always been easy for women at any time in human history to get laid. But keeping the guy around afterwards is the hard part, and I guarantee you the fact that they can't do this makes them pretty sad. Most women don't want constant promiscuity because it offers them nothing.
Women should blame themselves. Feminism in particular. Until recently, men and women needed to rely on each other for survival and that lead to procreation and the strong family bond. It also meant bringing more to the table than just sex for both parties. It's why "Can she cook?" and "Does he have a job?" were such important questions in years past because they were vital. The guy was out working to put food on the table and the mom was home taking care of kids and there wasn't a lot of time for "Does he make me happy?" "Am I still attracted to him?" Couple this with the liberal agenda of tearing down anything and everything moralistic int he world and you've created the perfect storm where men and women don't need each other anymore, and this extends to people in general which is why people are more connected than ever and there are more people than ever, but we as individuals have never felt more alone.
But they can get the government to pay for them anyway. This is the disaster that is slowly grinding our ship of state onto the rocks.
In the past, women treated their virtue like their lives depended on it. And in large part, because it did. Families would also act to protect said virtue, because young people can be impulsive and act in a way that is to the detriment of their future (i.e. promiscuity with males who cannot provide for them or their child). But these days, there's no notion of shame or exclusion. Impulsively, one might say, this is good, people shouldn't be shamed for who they love. But this is naive and foolish; shame is not some artifact of human cruelty from an earlier, barbaric age. It is a social enforcement tool without which we jeopardize our entire society.
A woman doesn't even have to be attractive. She can create a Tinder profile, indicate in her profile that she's looking for sex, and swipe right on every guy she sees. Within 24 hours she'll probably have dozens, if not hundreds, of matches.
That doesn't work the other way around. Only men with very high social status find women falling over each other to sleep with them. Think major CEOs, powerful politicians, professional athletes, big name Hollywood actors, famous musicians, etc.
Repeal the 19th and get women out of the workplace! Women in the workplace just means it now takes 2 incomes to provide the lifestyle one man used to provide. In turn children get cared for by the state and in turn indoctrinated with communist ideology The fundamental unit of society is the family. Not the individual. Heads of household (men) need to be at the helm of political decisions. Otherwise this country will slip further into degeneracy. Women, submit to your husbands,as your husbands submit to God. That is the divinely appointed order to keep society in harmony and free from the forces of evil, chaos, and bondage.
Peoole think this is sexist but it's not. Women are happier and more fulfilled being with kids and having a strong man in their lives.
The past 100 years is the only proof i need to show that all of these "rights" for women has ruined not only western society but women. When you literally go against your nature you are destined to be unhappy.
I'm a single man and i hate it but God says it's better to live on a mountian by yourself then live with a pretentious woman so until i meet one that isn't i will be content being alone.
I don't care if my values are "sexist", "racist", "ablest", or any of the other invented humanist sins. I care about aligning my values with the divine. Humanism seeks to invert the divine relationship and invent a new god (communist A.I.) to serve mankind manna on demand and excuse every act of sin in the name of counterfeit "freedom".
God is a nationalist. That's why he confounded tongues when man first sought to climb to heaven to supplant him with the tower of Babel. (Check out the EU Parliament for comparison)
My typical experience in Florida is seeing an attractive woman and then having her thoroughly wizened and used-up mother appear and say "some people think we're sisters". It's always gross.
Lol, if this could catch on we'd win definitely. I think leftists are leftists because they were raised really poorly, and there're very few ways out of it for them.
Can confirm. But what’s describe above are more of the foot soldiers of liberal women. There are a lot of very well-off, highly-educated liberal women with well-connected husbands heading up a lot of the organizations working behind the scenes. These are the attorneys, executives, doctors, socialites, etc. who help raise funds, manage the foot soldiers and other staff, and keep paperwork in order.
This is why Women's Suffrage was such a bad idea and why the founders never allowed women to vote in the first place. We have our awesome women on this side but the majority are like the one here in the pic.
75% of taxes paid by men - 80% of benefits collected by women
This is no accident. It all started the moment women got the chance to vote.
When Government took over the role of husband, society quickly started to flush down the toilet.
Remember the whole "Great Society" experiment by LBJ was to get the 'dem blacks' back on the plantation, exchanging their vote for government cheese. It just so happens that the net was spread out so damn far that the Democrats realized they could enslave everyone. Free Sex, Free abortions on demand and welfare....when you threaten someone's gravy train they will fight tooth and nail.
White leftist women are a completely different breed from our based female centipedes, not to mention normies, valley girls, tradwives, etc. This is one slice of the pie, and it's a nasty slice.
As a general rule of mine, I don't trust anyone that doesn't eat bacon. Another rule is I don't trust anyone who thinks mainly with Pathos. So I will never trust a female Vegan... As well as others.
Many , because they have no children, move that despair of not having a family into statism and a love for government rather than fulfilling the biological need to raise a child. The love of immigrant children, hatred of men, abortion as s right and environmental lunacy fill the void.
Grab a beer and watch this brief documentary, it explains (((who))) introduced this culture destroying poison into our nation...watch and come to your own conclusion....
What do all of that particular group of women who live lives based on emotion have in common? Their agendas & fears are all driven solely by what they see & hear on traditional and social media. Which is nearly all controlled by whom? The header is incorrect.
This redpill may be a bit too large for this audience.
Going to watch.
Most people are not ready to wake up to whom is the one pulling the string behind feminism.
The reason feminists won killing the intact family is that they first changed the civil laws in divorce court by criminalizing and bankrupting the father.
If the father disagrees with automatically losing his children to a four day a month "visitation schedule;" lose 18 years of his income; and, lose most his assets, THEN he will be dragged into court so many times while potentially being accused of domestic violence that he will lose his job and have to wait 2 years to get the violence charge expunged to find another good job, and other things.
Dr Warren Farrell explains this to Dr Jordan Peterson. Dr Farrell was a leader of the women's movement until he started to support children, then feminists cancelled him.
https://youtu.be/v5O_FLUWYmg?t=87
After family, feminists moved to employment then leadership positions in academics, entertainment, church, legal system, politics, media, FORTUNE 1,000 companies, and other things.
Feminist have a history of success in changing culture and laws.
Based
Lots of comments here about Jews
What's the end game? Name it? Explain what the plan is front to back with the in between steps. Spell it out because I have no idea. Everyone just keeps saying "the jews" "I know right? Jews lol" "yes i agree jeeeews"
Explain this. Please. Anyone I dont want a link to someone's 40000 word dissertation I want a nice tidy summary broken down with logic and historic examples.
I got a beautiful one from another poster explaining why he himself was suspicious, but he wasn't ready to call it a global conspiracy against our womenfolk
A -- islam is still not our friend 🙄
B -- women CAN be stupid. Dont make excuses by giving out an unquantifiable get out of jail free card
(Its not you specifically. This is a reply to all the other posts on this thread too)
If the shoe fits… it is brave to say what is on everyone's mind but are afraid to say. Thank you for saying it.
... white feminists
Western societies have always treated their women like children. And by that I mean that hardly any of them had to ever live with the consequences of their actions and decisions. It only became a problem when they started treading them like superior beings.
Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Bella Abzug, Gloria Allred, Lisa Bloom, Emma Goldman, Erica Jong, Rosa Luxemburg, and Gertrude Stein come to mind.
Dig deeper. The puppet master is higher up.
Literal vampire potbellied goblins?
The Goyim knows. Shut him down!
This is nothing. I've seen race-based IQ arguments that would top this stuff.
You love to see it.
the J E W S
Can't get my head around people who simultaneously argue that black people can be physically stronger and faster genetically, but somehow intelligence isn't genetic. It's proven true, that some races are more intelligent than others.
Welcome to MGTOW
lol..these people downvoting you don't know, MGTOW doesn't recruit: They let the THOTS do that for them.
MGTOW is gay cancer for incels. Grow up and deal with the real world. Also, repeal the 19th.
My pseudo-liberal friend loves to say "It all went to hell when we gave them the right to vote!"
your friend is right
https://imgur.com/NKoCDOZ
Hilarious. That section pretty much describes Sweden.
Dealing with the real world is the whole point. No one can force me to pay for a woman I have to choose to. And since they are all turning into leftist puppets that cheat and steal from
I mean you arent wrong...
Pede here who has known this forbidden truth for years.
It's a lonely existence when you carry this burden in a hotbed blue nexus of these creatures.
Every HR department in every large company in America contains at least one of these women.
Are you hiring?
Tell them how wonderful they are.
Where do I send my resume? I'll sweep floors, whatever. My current employer has fag flags all over the damn place and it's nauseating to see.
Are HR departments mandatory or something? They just seem to spread this diversity cancer.
It's no coincidence. The HR dept is the one that controls behaviour. It's the most parental of all departments including the CEO while being harder to push back against than any other department, and having the most direct influence over whether you keep your job even over your own team and supers
Its mom. Like no joke its mom
As my grandfather often said, workplaces fell apart when the Personnel Office became "Human Resources". Personnel are people. Resources are objects intended to be exploited. In most cases, the feminists and liberals used HR as the foot in the door and created a lot of chaos for the rest of us.
Bingo, in fact, if your aren't one of these little snowflakes you can't be gainfully employed in the HR industry.
By the way....the invention of the HR department is one of the single biggest contributors to the 'woke' corporations today.
Most employment I have obtained, I have had to go around HR with insiders just to get past their filtering. Basically, have an advocate inside the company at manager or director level that mandates that you are the proper hire over some other person who 'ticks' the right boxes for diversity, background, etc. It's true.
Yep.
In the old days, hiring was handled directly by the managers. They would then decide which candidate would be the best fit for their team.
Now, you don't even get to speak to a manager unless you're screened by the cat lady in HR. And she's going to reject people for ideological reasons because she doesn't know the intricacies and needs of each department in the company. How the fuck is a gender studies major going to know who is the best candidate for a mechanical engineering position?
EXACTLY. We need to start a banner movement with 'Out with HR,' or 'HR is Cancer,' or something...really, if anyone just stops for a second and considers how they operate, they would be forced to say 'Huh, gee, you're right! What in the hell were we thinking?...when did we surrender business decisions on hire over to some pseudo-intellectual, cultist and feminist group of people?'
how about this motto....'Fuck HR!'
Don't fuck HR. That's how single mothers come about.
You can't spell "whore" without "HR"!
Now, now. The Bad Brains may have some strange Rastafarian views about things, but HR seems pretty red pilled on homos and T H E M.
IMO HR is pretty much a scam perpetrated to allow otherwise unemployable women to have jobs.
Also the very term Human Resources speaks volumes about the thinking of the kind of people who come up with this shit.
Human Resources; suggesting a person is no more important than a box of paper-clips or printer toner.
It doesn't have to be a nefarious thing HR departments are frequently the ones who write job postings and as one might expect, they dont necessarily know what they should even be looking for
Must know javascript
Must know python
Must know c++
Must know html 5
Must be a photoshop animation wizard!
A programmer is going to likely know 3 of those max it's probably not photoshop. If it is, it ain't animation. These are all "4 year degrees" if you will
(I'm a designer. I see this kind of stuff all the time if I'm looking for a contract etc)
The most observant part of this image post is the fact that they automatically view everyone as equal. Not in terms of rights, but in terms of morals and goals. They are stupid and brainwashed.
Blink twice if they're cancer.
No comment either. Can't talk.
Their father, and yes some have known fathers, who "want the best for their daughter," and won't let her marry and have kids early because "he wants more for her than that," is a hidden problem.
Their mother, who also wants the daughter to "do more with her life than she did" is another problem. She ends up denying her daughter the very thing she herself has. A child.
If both parents would have a fit if the young woman married and got pregnant, you are going to have a single woman. With huge student loan, often.
Every month that a single person, male or female, survives, and is still single at the end of, is another living proof to that person that being single is survivable. Every month is another experience that the known thing, the familiar, being single, may be better than the scary unknown, being married.
Look around at the young people you know and make matches.
Then don't just leave them to their devices, stay on it, and ask them if it's going OK, and explain and explain to them, how to adjust, be flexible, talk things out, and develop patience, with this other being.
Children cement marriage.
Having children, fast, prevents the man from seeing the new wife as his property and his pleasure pal. All for him. If you let that happen, he may resent eventual children as taking her attention away from him.
And the men who indulge and amuse women who are like the photo, when she takes that hat off and dresses nicely, are part of the problem. They are not standing up for their rights to children. They are not going to get children anyplace else.
Social media has fucked their minds.
Women are more influenced by media than men are. Fact. And when it's 24/7, well here we are.
Women trade in attention; this is an inherent aspect of their evolutionary biologically-driven behavior. The mass-market for attention that digital platforms represent is a hugely addicting drug, and consequently, a huge distraction for young women. While the number of men they appear to attract with this digital net is massive, and the influence their perceive themselves to have over their "followers" and likers of posts is (in a sense) real, there's no substance to these false virtual relationships. Unless E-girls start marrying simp OnlyFans followers in order to creating stable, loving families and prove me wrong, of course.
Odd there seem to be users downvoting this...
Social media algorithm shows you what you most desire. It’s the devil evolving into digital form
As someone who spends too much time on YouTube, I can tell you that they'll sneak in recommendations which are very much the opposite of what you have expressed interest in and these spurious recommendations almost always lean left.
dating apps = thots on roids
And so...it begins.
Wait what. Please fill me in
I also would like to know what this means.
Who are breeding with the blue arm pit haired women?
They have actually done studies that show the female of any species can find a mate (short term). Men...not so much. What I'm saying is any woman can find a man to fuck her in literally no time.
Except that they can't actually get any of these men to commit to relationships with them. It's literally always been easy for women at any time in human history to get laid. But keeping the guy around afterwards is the hard part, and I guarantee you the fact that they can't do this makes them pretty sad. Most women don't want constant promiscuity because it offers them nothing.
Women should blame themselves. Feminism in particular. Until recently, men and women needed to rely on each other for survival and that lead to procreation and the strong family bond. It also meant bringing more to the table than just sex for both parties. It's why "Can she cook?" and "Does he have a job?" were such important questions in years past because they were vital. The guy was out working to put food on the table and the mom was home taking care of kids and there wasn't a lot of time for "Does he make me happy?" "Am I still attracted to him?" Couple this with the liberal agenda of tearing down anything and everything moralistic int he world and you've created the perfect storm where men and women don't need each other anymore, and this extends to people in general which is why people are more connected than ever and there are more people than ever, but we as individuals have never felt more alone.
TBH, Colttaine destroyed the argument for Stay at Home Mothers as well. Link below.
https://youtu.be/rJGdw20pNgQ?t=581
But they can get the government to pay for them anyway. This is the disaster that is slowly grinding our ship of state onto the rocks.
In the past, women treated their virtue like their lives depended on it. And in large part, because it did. Families would also act to protect said virtue, because young people can be impulsive and act in a way that is to the detriment of their future (i.e. promiscuity with males who cannot provide for them or their child). But these days, there's no notion of shame or exclusion. Impulsively, one might say, this is good, people shouldn't be shamed for who they love. But this is naive and foolish; shame is not some artifact of human cruelty from an earlier, barbaric age. It is a social enforcement tool without which we jeopardize our entire society.
A woman doesn't even have to be attractive. She can create a Tinder profile, indicate in her profile that she's looking for sex, and swipe right on every guy she sees. Within 24 hours she'll probably have dozens, if not hundreds, of matches.
That doesn't work the other way around. Only men with very high social status find women falling over each other to sleep with them. Think major CEOs, powerful politicians, professional athletes, big name Hollywood actors, famous musicians, etc.
Women choose who they sleep with.
Men choose who they marry.
If a woman ever says, "My past doesn't matter," they really mean, "I made poor choices and am banking on you also making a poor choice."
Bingo - women are the gatekeepers to sex, men are the gatekeepers to commitment.
Sex belongs to women, commitment belongs to men.
Women make the mistake of thinking sex equals commitment -- they confuse their sexual value with their relationship value.
Truth is men have lower standards for sex than relationships.
We don't know their names, but we do know that many have female penises, if that answers your question.
Fat, bearded, effeminate, flannel and black plastic-rimmed glass wearing dopey soy boys.
Repeal the 19th and get women out of the workplace! Women in the workplace just means it now takes 2 incomes to provide the lifestyle one man used to provide. In turn children get cared for by the state and in turn indoctrinated with communist ideology The fundamental unit of society is the family. Not the individual. Heads of household (men) need to be at the helm of political decisions. Otherwise this country will slip further into degeneracy. Women, submit to your husbands,as your husbands submit to God. That is the divinely appointed order to keep society in harmony and free from the forces of evil, chaos, and bondage.
Peoole think this is sexist but it's not. Women are happier and more fulfilled being with kids and having a strong man in their lives.
The past 100 years is the only proof i need to show that all of these "rights" for women has ruined not only western society but women. When you literally go against your nature you are destined to be unhappy.
I'm a single man and i hate it but God says it's better to live on a mountian by yourself then live with a pretentious woman so until i meet one that isn't i will be content being alone.
I don't care if my values are "sexist", "racist", "ablest", or any of the other invented humanist sins. I care about aligning my values with the divine. Humanism seeks to invert the divine relationship and invent a new god (communist A.I.) to serve mankind manna on demand and excuse every act of sin in the name of counterfeit "freedom".
God is a nationalist. That's why he confounded tongues when man first sought to climb to heaven to supplant him with the tower of Babel. (Check out the EU Parliament for comparison)
This.
God wants each tribe to have an identity. Globalism is a false God.
Fractal localism is the answer.
What are you getting at with the EU parliament?
https://www.traditioninaction.org/History/G_009_OldNewBabel.html
Ok, thanks. That article talks about legal removal of all crosses from Italy, or at least from their schools. Do you know the current status of that?
An idea starts to be interesting when you get scared of taking it to its logical conclusion.
It was a mistake; nothing to wonder about.
Probably the worst one in this country besides the federal reserve.
I don't necessarily disagree, but men share the blame for allowing this to happen.
Men in my opinion take most of the blame since they were 100% in charge of this country.
Yes, LEFTIST women. Not women in general. Except Florida. ALL women in Florida are fucked in the head.
re: Florida, in my 11 years there I was unable to disprove your assertion
Have known good women in many other places. But not there.
Lol, why is that? Was thinking of moving to Florida.
Sounds like you should get married first. Then move to Florida.
As a native born Floridian, I agree
My typical experience in Florida is seeing an attractive woman and then having her thoroughly wizened and used-up mother appear and say "some people think we're sisters". It's always gross.
Is this why we only hear about "Florida man?"
No, we just have guys that really like to outdo each other here, and they are more bold in shit they do, or are just plain retarded its almost funny.
Course the occasional Florida Woman pops up for some really outlandish shit...
Somebody should remake Lenny Kravits' American Woman into Florida Woman. Should be mixed with Jet's Crazy Bitch by the sounds of it
Pretty much, it would be fitting.
All x's are y's is a rotten philosophy when dealing with people.
All [people who live by X values] get [Y results] is a perfectly reasonable statement.
But not the same as all X are Y. You know my point, and I get yours ;)
TBF, while the most popular form of this cancer may be known to be "white liberal women" you don't have to be white to qualify.
Race bating alt right trash post.
Sean Connery was right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo0d1zTAFKA
Based.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njyxSH6dZ0U
Le tits now
Nasty Women
"Equal Rights" Really worked out for humanity didnt it?
I agree, and I'm a woman.
They infect every college campus in this country!
Lol, if this could catch on we'd win definitely. I think leftists are leftists because they were raised really poorly, and there're very few ways out of it for them.
Can confirm. But what’s describe above are more of the foot soldiers of liberal women. There are a lot of very well-off, highly-educated liberal women with well-connected husbands heading up a lot of the organizations working behind the scenes. These are the attorneys, executives, doctors, socialites, etc. who help raise funds, manage the foot soldiers and other staff, and keep paperwork in order.
I'm the product of one.. It sucks
This is why Women's Suffrage was such a bad idea and why the founders never allowed women to vote in the first place. We have our awesome women on this side but the majority are like the one here in the pic.
75% of taxes paid by men - 80% of benefits collected by women
This is no accident. It all started the moment women got the chance to vote.
When Government took over the role of husband, society quickly started to flush down the toilet.
Remember the whole "Great Society" experiment by LBJ was to get the 'dem blacks' back on the plantation, exchanging their vote for government cheese. It just so happens that the net was spread out so damn far that the Democrats realized they could enslave everyone. Free Sex, Free abortions on demand and welfare....when you threaten someone's gravy train they will fight tooth and nail.
Women are why Trudeau was elected again.
repeal the 19th
White leftist women are a completely different breed from our based female centipedes, not to mention normies, valley girls, tradwives, etc. This is one slice of the pie, and it's a nasty slice.
Yeah, compare the illegitimacy rate between white and black women then get back to me.
As a general rule of mine, I don't trust anyone that doesn't eat bacon. Another rule is I don't trust anyone who thinks mainly with Pathos. So I will never trust a female Vegan... As well as others.
Many , because they have no children, move that despair of not having a family into statism and a love for government rather than fulfilling the biological need to raise a child. The love of immigrant children, hatred of men, abortion as s right and environmental lunacy fill the void.
Obviously not, or else plannedemic and plannedriots wouldn't have worked so well
[Looks around]
So, anyone have any argument?
[Looks around again].
Soooo...um, no one?
[Looks around once more]
Ok. All those in favor of accepting this explanation, raise your had for Yes.
Grab a beer and watch this brief documentary, it explains (((who))) introduced this culture destroying poison into our nation...watch and come to your own conclusion....
https://youtu.be/L6l0JL6loXc
Then they fuck bernie bros and create more of them
What do all of that particular group of women who live lives based on emotion have in common? Their agendas & fears are all driven solely by what they see & hear on traditional and social media. Which is nearly all controlled by whom? The header is incorrect.
I'm having trouble finding the lie in this post. I don't even think it exists.
White, liberal Jewish women then are the devil's handmaidens then, right?
PvSy o1U F us1TLWF vuDP acYuF1scT 7O3 nNUpQBY zPF6wC R8z o4wo KW UpAnA8 SSUN HR4StfGXzW wFIM5W jAhgEXA3 lOY fLtjwf 0jqIn3PXkWkpU ixaQ3 yLjc q8bjbNQGafk Sq AO M2U LS VfGxdU nbY cfR7 2v 0cem pnM O9 cwru3Xx8fL RZ9LC 6akV mI FF DNLql NX8 oxJa bgFi XT zo1p0 C7cEBNtsI v95n P4FD dZ7 S8AA4O AOhnspe 7pK EoePH au V5V06l qgaC NB8m RH11 Hjb8kGz exSa YR 6e4R9 QEvEPB ZmpAF05 IxHd ootBk qNlBSKo
HA they would back any war if the EU or UN globalist pigs started it.
Amen!
LOL. /pol is a riot.
White leftist women with or without penises.
One made the other, anon. Kick the electric Jew out of your living room, NOW!