yep, that's exactly it. crazy how the masks wearers and non wearers fall almost exactly on party lines. One party (the one claiming to be of science) makes decisions based on emotions and does what its told. The other thinks for itself, looks at the evidence, and understands that masks are bullshit - even the WHO and Fauxi said so.
Sure, but it's less about the WHO and Fauci, and more about the hypocrisy of being told to believe every word they say unless it's inconvenient and the inconsistent application of their mandates
yep, that's exactly it. crazy how the masks wearers and non wearers fall almost exactly on party lines. One party (the one claiming to be of science) makes decisions based on emotions and does what its told. The other thinks for itself, looks at the evidence, and understands that masks are bullshit - even the WHO and Fauxi said so.
It's easy to know who allies and enemies are in public without speaking a word.
By design I would guess
Never use another group to validate your point, it disempowers you.
Sure, but it's less about the WHO and Fauci, and more about the hypocrisy of being told to believe every word they say unless it's inconvenient and the inconsistent application of their mandates