So you’re just resigned to that possibility? We on the right can put our finger on the scales and increase the likelihood of then turning in each other. Turning on each other is in their nature. They are doing it all the time, even now.
It’s not as hopeless of a situation or as scary of a bogeyman as you’re making it out. Plus a lot of the leadership is being arrested. If that continues, there won’t be a coordinated leadership anymore and it will be pandemonium on the streets.
Is a lot of the leadership being arrested now? I hope so. Do you have a link to that info?
I'm not making anything out to be "hopeless" or a "scary bogeyman". I'm just looking at realities we're dealing with. The leadership of blm are ultimately about marxism, by their own words and admission. Cultural, economic and political marxism. They are not about the mainstream black culture that is culturally, and in other ways, less leftist than the blm organization.
There was a lot of grassroots sentiment fueling the initial Floyd protests. But what we've seen the last 3-4 weeks has mostly the features of a top-down hierarchy organizing and driving this. A lot of these mobs that attack statues are half-white to mostly white (even the Confederate memorial mobs in the south have included a lot of whites). The great majority of these people, their leaders, planners, and sources of money, their allies in the corporate world, in media, among local, state, and federal Dim politicians - all of these groups are ideological hard-Left true believers. They won't really be affected or fragmented by what you suggest, at least not in the short term. Long term is different and there is obvious value in the long term approach for future sake, but to take down this current insurrection we must use different tactics - they aren't going to turn on each other for cultural or political reasons b/c they're all too much in unison on that stuff. Now you may get some to roll on others in exchange for lighter sentences but that's a different thing.
No, leadership are in step together. Much of the rank-in-file may not be, but the ones calling the shots and orchestrating things are.
They won't likely turn on each other until after they've accomplished their current goals of tearing America down.
So you’re just resigned to that possibility? We on the right can put our finger on the scales and increase the likelihood of then turning in each other. Turning on each other is in their nature. They are doing it all the time, even now.
It’s not as hopeless of a situation or as scary of a bogeyman as you’re making it out. Plus a lot of the leadership is being arrested. If that continues, there won’t be a coordinated leadership anymore and it will be pandemonium on the streets.
Is a lot of the leadership being arrested now? I hope so. Do you have a link to that info?
I'm not making anything out to be "hopeless" or a "scary bogeyman". I'm just looking at realities we're dealing with. The leadership of blm are ultimately about marxism, by their own words and admission. Cultural, economic and political marxism. They are not about the mainstream black culture that is culturally, and in other ways, less leftist than the blm organization.
There was a lot of grassroots sentiment fueling the initial Floyd protests. But what we've seen the last 3-4 weeks has mostly the features of a top-down hierarchy organizing and driving this. A lot of these mobs that attack statues are half-white to mostly white (even the Confederate memorial mobs in the south have included a lot of whites). The great majority of these people, their leaders, planners, and sources of money, their allies in the corporate world, in media, among local, state, and federal Dim politicians - all of these groups are ideological hard-Left true believers. They won't really be affected or fragmented by what you suggest, at least not in the short term. Long term is different and there is obvious value in the long term approach for future sake, but to take down this current insurrection we must use different tactics - they aren't going to turn on each other for cultural or political reasons b/c they're all too much in unison on that stuff. Now you may get some to roll on others in exchange for lighter sentences but that's a different thing.