Worth noting. The upper (where the bolt carrier rides) is still not chromed in mil spec rifles. The barrel is chrome lined. The chambers are therefore chrome lined as well. But the upper is aluminum and is never internally chromed. Thats where you got me a bit confused. Chrome lined barrels do help with durability, but make little difference in reliability. The rifling lasts longer in chrome lined barrels. That doesnt affect function, rather it affects accuracy. Now, bad accuracy can certainly lead to casualty, but not as fast as a jam.
I don't see how a chromed receiver would be of benefit? Maybe easier to clean, but operationally, it shouldn't make much difference if any.
Edit: the move to carbine length had systems increased reliability, supposedly. But also increased wear. Should have gone with mid length, imo.
It made the gun jam in combat, initially, yeah.
Worth noting. The upper (where the bolt carrier rides) is still not chromed in mil spec rifles. The barrel is chrome lined. The chambers are therefore chrome lined as well. But the upper is aluminum and is never internally chromed. Thats where you got me a bit confused. Chrome lined barrels do help with durability, but make little difference in reliability. The rifling lasts longer in chrome lined barrels. That doesnt affect function, rather it affects accuracy. Now, bad accuracy can certainly lead to casualty, but not as fast as a jam.