3912
Comments (711)
sorted by:
446
AtariArtist 446 points ago +455 / -9

Note - don't point your gun at your wife - unless you really don't like your wife.

432
ChrisSuperDude 432 points ago +435 / -3

Note - don't point your gun at your wife - unless you're George Floyd. FTFY

123
AtariArtist 123 points ago +126 / -3

Doh - fuck - missed a Jesus Floyd joke opportunity. Good one!

47
AlphaOmaga 47 points ago +48 / -1

WWGD

19
Spicy_maymay 19 points ago +19 / -0

Pop some fenty's

8
Samuel_L_Bronkowitz 8 points ago +8 / -0

...fall asleep at Wendy's.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
MightyEighth 5 points ago +5 / -0

Take a knee

18
kornesque 18 points ago +20 / -2

Dude, I came to to say top OP. So jelly I didn't think of it first...some people just got it.

5
valadin89 5 points ago +5 / -0

PBUH

2
thegeebeebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

F for profit

81
hocuspocusfocusjeep 81 points ago +82 / -1

I’m not going to sit here and let you disrespect St. Floyd for pointing that gun at that pregnant woman’s stomach. We need justice and everything is racist!!!

51
Chopblock 51 points ago +51 / -0

St. Floyd was making her comfortable so they could have a discussion!

25
UnstableGoat 25 points ago +25 / -0

Lol is this an impersonation of Alex Jones impersonating Gov Northam?

14
Chopblock 14 points ago +14 / -0

Northam said it on a radio show unaffiliated with Alex Jones, just to be clear.

12
Kekintosh2020 12 points ago +12 / -0

Eddie Bravo has left the chat

5
linereddit 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is kek in these words

3
zx9john 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you think there might be a marketing team for PP trying to angle that for good sales... “Don’t risk being threatened as a hostage over a clump of cells... call us now!”

36
ProphetOfKek 36 points ago +37 / -1

Congratulations to St. Floyd for one month free from drugs!

18
NormaJeanRocks 18 points ago +18 / -0

Dindu nuffin...literally

6
LittleRedRidingPills 6 points ago +6 / -0

He can breave now!!!

6
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is he visiting Grandma?

14
VetforTrump 14 points ago +15 / -1

One gun aimed at a Fetus does not make up for 200 years of suffering that I never experienced.

3
hocuspocusfocusjeep 3 points ago +4 / -1

I was being facetious, not fascist

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
2
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
12
YouKnowWhatItIs87 12 points ago +14 / -2

Sheeeit you think somebody like that could maintain a wife?

23
ChrisSuperDude 23 points ago +25 / -2

I don't know if it was his wife or not, but I was referencing how George Floyd pointed a gun at a pregnant woman's stomach and went to jail for it and was more getting at how he was a piece of shit who was made out to be MLK because the media hates white people.

19
YouKnowWhatItIs87 19 points ago +21 / -2

Oh I know all to well about that criminal turned saint upon death. Shaun King thinks he should be the black Jesus. From what I understand it was just some random pregnant lady or a friend of friend whom he robbed at gun point for drug money.

2
SideofB33f 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the absence of religion, the left worships false idols like Floyd, Marx, etc. I reckon that’s why there’s a catholic commandment against it.

10
saveMySpeech 10 points ago +10 / -0

🔥

110
Rainman 110 points ago +110 / -0

Yeah neither one of them had great muzzle discipline but I think they accomplished the task at hand

25
KingKek33 25 points ago +26 / -1

Judging by the basic biatch AR, he just bought that very recently, and has probably not shot guns before.

14
DonDonBananana 14 points ago +16 / -2

My thoughts exactly. looked liked a plain upper and lower. no customized stuff or even a good stock. Not a kommando by any regards.

49
havax 49 points ago +49 / -0

well, tbf, i've shot guns all my life, and i haven't added a bunch of overpriced bullshit to my AR-15. i'm fine shooting open sight.

9
Obamas_Prolapse 9 points ago +10 / -1

Good for you. The weapon is designed to be used just the way it comes in armed conflicts around the world. If I didn't have my aged eyeballs to deal with I'd probably not use the Kobra reflex sight on my SAR-1.

2
monk_of_trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Smells fuddy. Im just messing with you but for real, if you buy quality stuff, upgrading only helps you. The problem is the people that upgrade everything on their guns while not actually training. You can be great with a basic ar if you train, you can be even better with a better rifle, but you cant be great with an upgraded rifle and no training. If this wasnt true, people in shooting competitions and military would be using basic ar's and they arent.

8
SouthernJohn 8 points ago +9 / -1

Mall ninjas

1
ImFinallyNotAnAlt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m with you except I’ll pass on iron sights. All else is unnecessary.

2
monk_of_trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ill never understand the people that say theyd rather use iron sights. Lining up 2 things is always going to be faster and easier than 3, and the field of view is much better through a red dot. If youre worried about reliability, but your red dot on a qd mount and ditch it if your 50,000 hour battery life decides to end which, lets be honest, if you have a good red dot, its just not going to happen unless you forget to change batteries for like 5 years.

0
RighteousViolence1 0 points ago +1 / -1

And stay away from the green dot trijicon. The battery dies in 6 months or faster. I have had the same battery in my aimpoint micro t2 since I bought it 4 years ago. Buy once cry 2x.

1
KingKek33 1 point ago +1 / -0

Free floating can help tremendously.

For long range, good cheek weld and a non-wobbly stock can really help.

I don't run any grips.

1
KingKek33 1 point ago +2 / -1

You will be outshot in a tactical situation by a guy at the same level as you with a red dot.

Faster acquisition and they can keep both eyes open.

While iron sight are still useable, you must line up 2 points and keep 1 eye closed.

Everything else is just preference.

1
JohnWickParabellum 1 point ago +2 / -1

Honestly in this situation the sound of a 5.56 being discharged will be enough, most don't know how true to life the movie "Heat" with Robert DiNero and Val Kilmer was in that regard.

Ask any OIF or other sand box vet that has done months and years of CQB, but ask it LOUDLY.

"Whaaaat? Whaaat? Yeah it's loud! What?!?!? I can't hear you! What!?!?!"

Her little pistol on the other hand will just draw them closer, that mob has shot thousands of rounds on the street in similar pistols.

1
Spicy_maymay 1 point ago +1 / -0

Almost certainly he's using a .223

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
trollpoint 5 points ago +6 / -1

That's bullshit an AR is fine just the way it is without spending $400 on some bullshit.

1
KingKek33 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you consider higher accuracy bullshit....sure.

Will it work the way it is? Yes.

Will it be optimal? No.

7
z89101 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why the fuc did they abandon terrain/barrier advantage? Why go front? Because the DNC sent in Soros Useful Didoes?

My folk would treat them as terrorists. Interesting.

25
SnowflakeJuice 25 points ago +25 / -0

Because they didn't want graffiti all over their house and preferred threatening to shooting

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
20
ZombieConstitution 20 points ago +20 / -0

I couldn't notice anything else but the way she was holding that pistol.

Glad she didn't have to shoot it.

9
SuddenlyClintoned 9 points ago +10 / -1

Her trigger discipline makes me want to cry.

Honestly, they both look like they've never shot before. Probably new gun owners.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
omegapede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yea... the left is against gun education. As if learning about/how to use guns will increase gun crime :eyeroll:. All you'll get is people like this; first time gun owners (including leftists as their woke mob eats them up) who have no clue what they're doing. Now that's truly scary!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Robert 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you're defending your home against invaders you're not going to be using trigger discipline, keyboard commando.

-4
brahlurad -4 points ago +3 / -7

Wife probably accidentally committed "assault with a deadly weapon" a few times.

6
Buttfuk 6 points ago +7 / -1

No, she didn’t. Don’t make such claims when you know nothing about the law. I don’t understand why people like you need to act like gun gods and talk shit about these people. Clearly they’re new gun owners and probably haven’t had a chance to go to the range/learn safety. They’re still 100 times better off just brandishing those firearms then they would have been without having any. A lot of people are just now starting to buy firearms and they aren’t experts in them. So pull your head out of your ass you ignorant egotistical fuck.

105
deleted 105 points ago +105 / -0
68
deleted 68 points ago +68 / -0
71
rooftoptendie 71 points ago +71 / -0

exactly, theyre waving their guns around like a couple of idiot champagne liberals. This year will be their first time voting republican.

50
SecondProtectsFirst 50 points ago +52 / -2

Yep. He’s flagging his wife, she’s holding her pistol so limp-wristed it’d probably jam if she actually fired it. They walked outside to wave them around with zero cover when their house is covered in stone for cover, and has windows with a higher vantage point. And did they leave the fucking front door open? FFS.

These two are clearly uneducated on firearms and tactics and probably used to want guns banned so people wouldn’t do exactly what they’re doing.

25
rooftoptendie 25 points ago +25 / -0

he needs a training session with a couple of rooftop koreans. those glorious bastards post up the way posting up is meant to be.

20
hocuspocusfocusjeep 20 points ago +20 / -0

This is a great point. Totally had a higher vantage point. Also on point with the front door. Either it’s a show or they are stupid. Pick one

Edit: however they have every right to defend their home and lives, regardless how dumb they are

17
Mynamesprivate 17 points ago +17 / -0

The only thing thats actually respected IS force these days. It sucks those 2 made some really dangerous moves, but at the same time you know the other side has to respect them and thier own.

10
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, I mean everybody's dumping on them but they're the potential victims here. They're not the ones destroying property and attacking people. They didn't ask to be in that situation.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
10
OnlyAmerica 10 points ago +10 / -0

Those group thinks are the Reddit/CIA/CPP scums flooding this site. They are desperately trying to "seize the narrateef!"

6
SecondProtectsFirst 6 points ago +8 / -2

Yeah it definitely does. Myself and a few other people were just getting downvoted heavily on another thread for saying businesses have the right to deny service to people not wearing masks. My argument was that it’s the same exact principle that allows them to say “no shirt, no shoes, no service”.

Someone argued that the government shouldn’t be able to tell us who we can and can’t discriminate against but I personally think that it’s wrong to discriminate against something that’s not a choice, i.e. race/gender/disability (including a disability that prevents you from wearing a mask! Wtf, a nuanced opinion? Downvote!)

3
BladderBeerPoopin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their competitors will kick their ass.

7
TeamMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Uses limp-wrested in a sentence - Hello fellow 1911 owner!

4
SecondProtectsFirst 4 points ago +5 / -1

Man even a glock can fail to cycle correctly if you limp wrist that shit that badly.

3
TeamMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

That shit was cartoon level of bad.

3
OconusLurex 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought she was holding a cigarette at first, lol.

1
SecondProtectsFirst 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah I had to go back and edit my post after watching a couple more times, because at first I thought she was holding a phone/calling the cops and the guy was the only one armed.

23
Boog_boi45 23 points ago +25 / -2

Look at their house, look at his shirt! Dollars to bullets those two are liberals.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
7
sagebrushfire 7 points ago +11 / -4

Please. Driving off some “protestors” won’t change the 50 years of socialist, “we’re all in this together,” poison that has dripped into their ears and rotted their brains. They’ll still vote blue down the ballot, curse “the evil Republicans” and chock up this incident to “tempers that momentarily got out of control. They’re not all bad people!”

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
ryvrdrgn14 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a chance they back off gun control issues though. It's a start.

7
mintscape 7 points ago +7 / -0

100% Liberals or at least newly converted from Liberals to our side, real Conservatives would have a Antifa hunting hide setup and ready to go. There would also be a truck in the drive.

To be serious about it, I actually think the way they are acting isn't wise and invites trouble. Despite waving their guns around, they look scared and are acting like victims.

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
8
BidensPoopyUnderwear 8 points ago +8 / -0

Probably decided today to stop his regular donations to BLM/DNC.

7
GenderlessWookie 7 points ago +10 / -3

If he's a lawyer, no doubt in my mind he's a liberal cuck. I used to think that those people in tactical gear were cringe as fuck, but thanks pink shirt guy. You win over that.

2
Sticky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's not judge based on the superficial.

5
SnowflakeJuice 5 points ago +5 / -0

I see what you are saying, but the fact that they are a married couple probably gives them a 90% chance of being conservatives.

Maybe conservatives who are new gun buyers. The are a lot of 2A supporters who personally never felt the need to own a gun until recently

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
workinating 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yep.

13
TheTPL 13 points ago +14 / -1

It could also just be the fact that they're concentrating on the mob assembled outside.

Btw, not meant to be a snarky answer.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
24
deleted 24 points ago +26 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Herecomedatpresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It is thread like these that make me realize we have quite a few more shills and trolls than we used to back in the day on T_D.

0
AtariArtist 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ya gotta admit - the NM shooter was a smidge more capable.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
69
Purge-the-leftists 69 points ago +71 / -2

I was thinking the same thing you can tell by the way both of them handle their guns that they dont know what they are doing. But they are standing their ground.

39
deleted 39 points ago +40 / -1
32
_soundwave_ 32 points ago +33 / -1

Note the New Mexico patriot only needed to vent one of the scumbag assailants and the rest wanted no further parley.

10
Konig 10 points ago +10 / -0

What happened to that antifa scum from NM?

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
27
NormaJeanRocks 27 points ago +27 / -0

Didnt even notice she had one until you said it, but yea...they've probably never even had these out, but now is the perfect time to have them. Perfect example why ...edit: and holy fuck, if you look at the other videos in this thread these people live in a fucking castle, wow.

18
_soundwave_ 18 points ago +18 / -0

M16A2 clone is a LEGIT anti - antifa/communist weapon. It’s been featured in popular culture since the gulf war. The carrying handle/sight MEAN something to broke dick leftists. It’s been killing their communist brethren for a long time, and you see them react to it differently than the highspeed low drag boogaloo setups. It’s a lot like Iraqis reacting to huge knives with more fear than an actual firearm.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
jayjayjm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Puff the Magic Dragon

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +3 / -1

very true

6
AtariArtist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Like a face mask.

8
Bigus_Dickus 8 points ago +9 / -1

except the threat is real

2
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 2 points ago +11 / -9

The threat isreal

-2
EpicPede -2 points ago +4 / -6

truuuu

0
SecondProtectsFirst 0 points ago +5 / -5

A literal stone-clad castle with high windows to defend from but they walk out into the open with no cover where the rules of engagement are usually much stricter. 🤦🏼‍♂️

2
Sticky 2 points ago +2 / -0

People aren't soldiers.

-1
SecondProtectsFirst -1 points ago +1 / -2

I’m just saying castle doctrine doesn’t apply once you walk outside of your literal castle. There’s a stricter standard for when you can use deadly force outside the home. Unless you’re in Texas perhaps.

3
BecauseYoudBeInJail 3 points ago +4 / -1

Also both are barefoot and if you're about to pour hot brass on the ground, maybe at least wear some Crocs.

2
AOCs_tits 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dude had had enough of his tasseled loafers for one day. It was cocktail time at the mansion and then these peaceful, no-harm-meaning thugs had to show up.

1
TruthyBrat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have three pairs scattered around the house for when I want to walk to the mailbox, go out back and do some light gardening, etc. Perfect for that.

1
ryvrdrgn14 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have some crocs, but their grip on the ground is really bad. :(

37
deleted 37 points ago +38 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
364
Trumpdup4prez 364 points ago +364 / -0

Looks like they’re invading the rich neighborhoods out there...

AND STOP CALLING THEM PROTESTORS.

These people are the violent left. They are communists. They are evil scum of the Earth. They are NOT protestors.

78
AtariArtist 78 points ago +80 / -2

If they get into the really wooded areas like Town and Country to the west of Frontenac - woah nelly, You can hide bodies in there. It's ritzy homes in a massive grove of forest. I've taken people off the main roads down Conway at night and they freaked thinking we went into the bogs.

Of course the real bogs are behind Hog Hollow off Olive Blvd near Chesterfield. Those go into the flood plains - which do in fact flood - quite a bit. Those extend to Maryland Heights.

There's a great straight pristine stretch of road that goes to the waterworks where you can run 0-60 / 1mi acceleration tests with your car. There's no cross streets and both sides of the road drop off over 3 feet (meaning no place for a bored patrol car to hide - it's literally a misty swamp). No one drives to the water treatment plant so the asphalt is race track quality. I got one of my cars up to 100.

The catch is you gotta brake hard. It's a 90º hairpin at the end. So it's only good for tests up to 2 miles in length (perhaps a little more - but I wouldn't risk it).

16
Jabroni421 16 points ago +16 / -0

This house looks like one of the big ones lining forest park on lindell, do you know the location where this happened?

7
AtariArtist 7 points ago +7 / -0

I do now - but the owner of the house asked STL magazine to take the address off the article. That said - I found a cached version of it that pinpointed it. It's pretty close to Lindell. Dates back to 1909. Massive lot. Totally forgot that stretch. I usually kept going to get to Blueberry Hill on the Delmar Loop.

1
ThorsonTT 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's on Portland Place and Kingshighway. Typical St. Louis. Nice neighborhood not far from not-so-nice neighborhoods.

1
Jabroni421 1 point ago +1 / -0

On the front lines. Not a wise place to be

11
border_humper 11 points ago +11 / -0

Jim Hoft has entered the chat.

7
AtariArtist 7 points ago +8 / -1

I wish - although my first job out of Univ was working for a division of Pulitzer Publishing. The 1990s were split evenly between St. Louis and Denver (with Oklahoma, Utah, Kansas sprinkled in there too - I just tell people I grew up on I-70).

You put me in a car in St. Louis County and I'll make you think you fell off the face of the earth in less than 2 turns off the main roads - that's when you lay on the highbeams and floor it through the mist (always fun to do with the out of townies).

8
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 8 points ago +9 / -1

I cannot explain how insanely jealous I am that you live near a place called "hog hollow". It's sounds like a place where folks don't take kindly to leftist bullshit.

7
SecondProtectsFirst 7 points ago +9 / -2

Sounds like a place where you could get rid of a lot of bodies. Pigs will eat anything.

3
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 3 points ago +4 / -1

BrickTop enters the chat

2
dixond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best. Movie. Ever.

4
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes Tommy... Before zhe Germanz get here

3
Mexicola1976 3 points ago +4 / -1

My ex-wife can attest to that.

1
AtariArtist 1 point ago +3 / -2

I'm in AZ now - last time I lived in STL would have been 2004. Hog Hollow is one of those blink and you'll miss it things situated between Chesterfield and Creve Coeur on Olive Blvd. It sits on a natural rise above the flood plains just behind it that stretch to the levees of the Missouri River. You take Hog Hollow road north off Olive down and on your immediate left (which if you're not looking for it - you won't see) is Waterworks road.

7
runonce 7 points ago +8 / -1

Lol. We used to run around there occasionally back in the 70's before they built the levee and it was called Gumbo Flats.

6
AtariArtist 6 points ago +6 / -0

That levee failed in the floods of the early 90s so it's still unpopulated apart from some sports park(s), Creve Coeur airport and the waterworks (last I checked - which was 2004). It's minor agriculture otherwise. Too dangerous for putting houses into - it backs right up against the Missouri River. Hell I'm surprised Chesterfield let itself sprawl up to the banks like they've done lately. How many times has Spirit of St. Louis airport flooded?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
AtariArtist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus! No - but I'm going to look into this (reply mostly for bookmarking purposes).

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
19
Demonspawn 19 points ago +19 / -0

Looks like they’re invading the rich neighborhoods out there...

They absolutely were. This was a gated community: https://twitter.com/KyleKashuv/status/1277441305644347395

17
Thequadrupledecker 17 points ago +17 / -0

They look an awful lot like trespassers to me.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
16
AtariArtist 16 points ago +16 / -0

Pfft - They're chanting 'our streets'. No. No it's not. You've walked up a driveway. Where you can be shot.

Fucking idiots. I think they're from Wash U. Good Lord they've let admissions slide.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1277440901896421377?s=20

https://twitter.com/DrFraudci/status/1277441222433558528/photo/1

9
Illinoyed 9 points ago +9 / -0

They walk into the private entrance chanting we are gonna kill cops today.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
AmmoHoarder 7 points ago +7 / -0

They are protesting peace and prosperity

315
Dang 315 points ago +315 / -0

Protesting in a neighborhood? This isnt protesting. This is terrorism.

103
scoggydoogan 103 points ago +103 / -0

These idiots seem to think they can protest wherever they wish. But they forget about those pesky private property laws.

44
deleted 44 points ago +45 / -1
23
ProphetOfKek 23 points ago +24 / -1

Duty to retreat and let them burn/loot your hard earned shit

15
Peashout 15 points ago +15 / -0

It was just an unplanned donation to the masses.

7
AtariArtist 7 points ago +7 / -0

Castle Doctrine and Stand your ground are both in effect in STL. They just expanded the castle doctrine too.

3
kensai 3 points ago +3 / -0

I got worried so I looked it up for MI: While some state self defense laws have what is known as a "duty to retreat," that's not the case in Michigan. ... There is no duty to retreat (i.e. run or otherwise evade the attacker when it's an option) in Michigan as it has what are often referred to as "stand your ground" laws.

7
MicTheIrishRogue 7 points ago +7 / -0

Castle Doctrine for the win.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +2 / -1

You mean I can't just break into houses and take their stuff in protest? Did I mention it's a PROTEST?!

59
Dereliction 59 points ago +59 / -0

They're testing.

35
LikeAWombatScorned 35 points ago +35 / -0

They're going to learn pretty quickly that about half the home owners in the suburbs are armed.

23
MarcusAurelius 23 points ago +23 / -0

Well, they keep saying they are going to go to the suburbs. The middle class will protect what is theirs. The super wealthy though will hire contractors to beat the crowds, while acting shocked that there is such brutality in the world.

6
AtariArtist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ya I'm pretty sure now the lawyer in the video will be hiring protection for a bit.

As far as doxxing - um - he's a lawyer. They really shouldn't think it. Free money for him.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
refresco 4 points ago +4 / -0

I live in the suburbs of a very liberal city. My block is armed up. Blue collar neighborhoods arent fucking around, I dont care how many "union democrats" we have around here. Even those guys having hunting rifles for dove/duck/deer.

3
TruthyBrat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone else upped their concealed carry game? I was carrying a month ago, but I’m carrying more/bigger now.

23
Asun 23 points ago +24 / -1

Private property / gated neighborhood.
I wonder if castle doctrine covers the entire neighborhood.
https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1277435223412805638

19
Analmanlebron 19 points ago +19 / -0

Holy shit, who unlocked the gate for these assholes and let them through?

I don’t feel an ounce of sympathy if these “protestors” were shot for trespassing

5
EpicPede 5 points ago +6 / -1

It looks like they broke it down

4
AnotherPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Depends on the state, but many don't require you to retreat in a public space if you feel threatened, and I don't know how a mob of angry rioters wouldn't make you feel threatened.

Basically if you go to the gates of the neighborhood and tell them they aren't allowed in, and they force their way through the gates and act aggressively towards you, such as pushing you out of the way or getting in your face, then you have the right to shoot them in Missouri.

1
Sticky 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they legally could have opened fire the moment they went through the gate?

1
AtariArtist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well they deviated off the private street - into his driveway. So - um - they're fucked.

1
Herecomedatpresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once again the leftists shoving their intentional word usage down our throats.

1
TrumpTrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

They can “protest” wherever they want, the police and city let them. Want to protest in the middle of the interstate, no problem. Want to protest in the middle of busy downtown roads, no problem. In fact, the police have been helping them do these things instead of arresting them

217
Thingthing22 217 points ago +220 / -3

And just like that they were peaceful and moved the fuck on.

115
scoggydoogan 115 points ago +115 / -0

They were on the couple's property and quickly noped out of there once the mob found out about the 2nd amendment

8
TrumpTrain 8 points ago +9 / -1

One or two will be back at 3AM with flaming bricks I’m sure

3
Captain-Covfefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

flaming bricks of peace*

33
StaryHickory 33 points ago +33 / -0

Exactly, those people were within their rights to do that. Who the hell knows who is peaceful and who is not. Anyways its getting old people you have nothing to do with around your property chanting and marching.

It's gross behavior on its own.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
CMUBigGuy 9 points ago +9 / -0

There are easier targets. Bullies know that.

8
KILLARY4PRISON 8 points ago +8 / -0

For now... This dude is on Twitter and has been doxxed. He needs to hire security contractors asap.

149
Hey_thisnomypee 149 points ago +149 / -0

I love how the "protesters" are recording the couple like they're somehow out of line for defending themselves.

🤡🌎

80
Insanity_Trials 80 points ago +80 / -0

They're following their standard tactics, even if it doesnt actually work in this case. Provoke people, be violent and threatening, get them scared and/or pissed and then film them. Afterward claim you were just peaceful protesters who dindu

30
meals23 30 points ago +30 / -0

better judged by 12 than carried by 6

check out Massad Ayoob he is a genius when it comes to legal justifiable use of lethal force and he was an expert witness in the George Zimmerman trial that helped him to be rightfully exonerated

I feel bad for ZimZam though because that media narrative basically ruined his life, and since he's a decent human being he also feels tremendous guilt for ending a human life even if it was as useless as Trayvon's. Poor guy.

-11
Skipster777 -11 points ago +2 / -13

Wait y'all are Zimmerman supporters here?

11
meals23 11 points ago +11 / -0

Why wouldn't I be?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAw5ykIPOBM&t=3m38s

I highly recommend watching the whole documentary, it's 2 hours long, but if you don't feel like it I timestamped the relevant section there with ZimZam

Here's Massad Ayoob, that guy I mentioned earlier, talking about Stand Your Ground laws and what is considered justifiable use of lethal force. Remember that Massad Ayoob testified during the George Zimmerman trial and was instrumental in the acquittal.

If you believe that George Zimmerman is a bad person, that's fine, but you cannot possibly believe that he didn't act within the confines of the law to defend himself, and moreover if you believe he was a bad person without ever having met the man it is highly likely that you've just been spoon fed a bullshit media narrative.

1
Skipster777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well yeah I didn't completely look into it. But all I heard is he went after a black dude with a gun, similar to the recent dudes in trucks with shotties, and they got into a "scuffle" and shot him. So I really don't know what to think.

But I also heard some weird recent things about this man, can't remember what though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
18
AndyCuomoIsAMobster 18 points ago +18 / -0

It's because they know that the Twitterverse will back up their shitty point of view and they'll paint this hard working near-elderly couple as the "racisss holding uz down" when in fact the dude probably worked his ass off to have the ability to live like that.

10
Analmanlebron 10 points ago +10 / -0

They and the twatterverse hate anyone who has more than them - and that’s basically everyone

2
AtariArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

And chanting "Who's streets? Our streets" - when they were clearly not.

0
catvideos3 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’d have let fly a few warning shots

1
ThurstonHowell3rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Followed by "RELEASE THE HOUNDS!!!".

137
deleted 137 points ago +137 / -0
45
ChuckedBeef 45 points ago +46 / -1

Maybe they are marching on areas or targets they already know support Trump.

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
13
SirSeizureSalad 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think they want to BBQ and eat them.

43
MegaMagaMan13 43 points ago +43 / -0

Those doxxing are being doxxed in return. Thank God for pol.

21
Doug 21 points ago +21 / -0

Those responsible for the doxing have been doxed.

A moose once bit my sister.

5
AtariArtist 5 points ago +5 / -0

No realli! She was Karving her initials on the møøse with the sharpened end of an interspace tøøthbrush given her by Svenge - her brother-in-law - an Oslo dentist and star of many Norwegian møvies: "The Høt Hands of an Oslo Dentist", "Fillings of Passion", "The Huge Mølars of Horst Nordfink".

Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretty nasti...

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
8
_CaptainObvious 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm just going to put this out there... but lefits use their real names on twitter...

134
MAGAmanforever 134 points ago +135 / -1

Jesus Christ take lessons people FFS!

98
deleted 98 points ago +101 / -3
36
Chopblock 36 points ago +39 / -3

Flat TV perspective often makes barrel sweeps appear to happen that didn’t actually happen.

10
AtariArtist 10 points ago +14 / -4

Could be could be - but man - at 23 seconds? Woof. That's ... woof.

31
reallm 31 points ago +31 / -0

Likely the man handed it to her and said "shoot when I shoot". She wasn't going to just stand there with a glass of wine watching her husband.

17
1776-or-1984 17 points ago +18 / -1

sips wine when do we start blasting, honey?

10
bill_in_texas 10 points ago +10 / -0

"So anyway, I was ready to start blasting when my husband starts shooting......"

4
AtariArtist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tis the preppy lifestyle. Lots of preppies in STL County. Couple of schools even made it into "The Preppy Handbook".

5
rooftoptendie 5 points ago +5 / -0

my sides!

16
Pepedom 16 points ago +16 / -0

Omg.. begore I read your comment, I thought she was holding a phone recording.... yikes

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
10
Shwishyshwa 10 points ago +10 / -0

Holy crap I thought she was filming. Went back and watched again. Nope, that was gun handling.

3
SDhiker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yah in another video she's waving the gun around pointing it at the joggers. Also a no no in that specific instance but... i dunno, I don't really care anymore. As far I'm concerned they're trespassing, we're told to leave, and they responded with intimidation. Fuck em

1
Shwishyshwa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a feeling we will see more of this as the chaos spreads to city limits.

5
MarcusAurelius 5 points ago +5 / -0

Would be nice if they decided to both take this opportunity to take an NRA training course. It would have been nicer if they decided to do it a year ago.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
MarcusAurelius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I was looking around for Defensive Pistol I for one of my friends. Almost everything is closed because of COVID-19.

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
9
GhostOfMyFormerSelf 9 points ago +9 / -0

...before they are all censored...

6
bill_in_texas 6 points ago +6 / -0

Alternatively, maybe demonstrating uncontrolled and therefore inherently unpredictable actions were better tactics to frighten the rioters. I mean, nobody wants to go up against the really, absolutely, crazier than a shithouse rat dude. The fact that they didn't appear planned or disciplined suggests to me that they would be MORE likely to start shooting if anything had happened. If the guy is a lawyer, I suspect this was on purpose, and it apparently was an effective tactic.

106
deleted 106 points ago +106 / -0
45
Captnyestrday 45 points ago +45 / -0

Because the establishment wants their vote and wants you dead.

Overturning the election hasn't worked out so next is to burn down everything and everyone.

4
NineteenEightyFour 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because something something SLAVERY!!! That's why, you nazi. /s

3
Sum_devil 3 points ago +3 / -0

The did away with the sort of teaching we grew up with. Now they teach systemic racism and victimization to all the kids and they grow up into feminists, even the boys. that no one want to hire them except George Soros.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
68
justforthissubred 68 points ago +79 / -11

I love that they defended their property, but wtf people take a basic fucking safety class you are making us look like fucking retards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

61
Gunslinger1776 61 points ago +67 / -6

Who is this “us” you speak of? Did he have on a thedonald.win t-shirt I missed? The only fucking retards I see are the ones in front of this guy’s house. Good for him standing his ground.

16
deleted 16 points ago +21 / -5
14
Gunslinger1776 14 points ago +19 / -5

THIS GUY is making 125 million gun owners look like fucking retards? I’m sorry, I just don’t follow your logic.

“God made man. Samuel Colt made them equal.”

12
mvrak 12 points ago +14 / -2

He was scared out of his mind. Full fight or flight mode.

Where do I get training for a believable mob on my personal land that might rush me en masse?

2
Robert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously fucking keyboard commandos in this thread who think you'd keep the safety ON or apply trigger discipline with a reportedly violent mob literally within sprinting distance.

Absolutely hilarious.

0
PhoneBandit 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's a tough call, because if he stayed in his house out of harm's way, but peaking out ready to shoot, they would have been all over his house and things would have escalated. Weirdly, being out in front de-escalated the situation here. The only thing I would have changed is I would have sat down in a chair and not said anything to them. The videos would show you were calm and just exercising your rights. Then if something happened, it would be clear the protestors escalated first.

29
N7fury 29 points ago +31 / -2

Dude, easy. He was doing his best to stand his ground. They are probably not very experienced and really freaked out that terrorists are invading the neighborhood.

19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
18
KAGMAGIC2020 18 points ago +18 / -0

Lol. Wait til the fucking faggots and cockroaches meet the Americans that been shooting since childhood and have multiple relatives and descendants that served (If not themselves included). Fastest civil war in history.

4
NegativeRainbow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fastest civil war in history.

It will be over before all the casings hit the ground.

1
Robert 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is how lefty shills attack when they have nothing else on a monday morning.

"Hurrr but look how stupid he looks LOL stupid boomers"

16
thisguy883 16 points ago +20 / -4

What makes you think they are on our side?

Quite possible they are limousine liberals who got a little uncomfortable when the riots started in their part of town.

That woman holding the pistol is a dead giveaway of someone who has never handled a gun in her life, and the man looks like someone who only has guns because they look cool, and something to show off to his buddies.

11
KAGMAGIC2020 11 points ago +12 / -1

I mean if this event didnt scare them into changing their mind (if they are indeed libtards) nothing will.

8
Jabroni421 8 points ago +8 / -0

I’d assume they are liberals from the area they are in and the house.

2
justforthissubred 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck you're right! Also, I can't believe all the negative comments I got. The people clearly have never taken a basic class. It's irresponsible. Your'e right. Probably liberals.

1
deliquo 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a very quick donor search, I found three contributions in the name of the wife to RNC last year. edit: I thought they were to DJT, but they were RNC.

They are lawyers so judging their beliefs is difficult.

7
EpicPede 7 points ago +10 / -3

This is the wrong take. I'm proud of them.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
65
303Cal 65 points ago +66 / -1

These people look like they have never shot these guns. But that shows how affective they can be as a deterrent.

26
deleted 26 points ago +28 / -2
6
AnotherPatriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

When that guy flagged his wife the first time I would have been hidden behind at least 2 rows of people. But then again, I'm not dumb enough to be out there in the first place.

2
mvrak 2 points ago +3 / -1

Um, did you see her? I couldn't even tell if it was a gun or a wine glass with that limp wrist.

20
ColoradoTrumper45 20 points ago +20 / -0

Merely displaying the gun is enough to communicate that the violence of the situation will not be one sided.

Mobs are made of cowards and losers who lack enough conviction to stand alone. You stand your ground, and they flee.

9
dixond 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bingo. Even if the overwhelming numbers means pink shirt guy goes down in the end, there is a nearly 100% chance that someone(s) in that mob will get fresh lead through them on the way down; and no-one in that mob wants it to be them.

3
303Cal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point and well said.

6
StaryHickory 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's almost more scary when the people don't know how to use the guns. As a potential violent offender I don't know if he will oopisie and just blow off one of my testicles or just most of a hand. The chances of you being maimed or dying an undignified death are greatly increased.

51
Undying 51 points ago +52 / -1

If he did not have that gun they would have burned down his house or worse.

11
Randomite 11 points ago +11 / -0

Absolutely they would have.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
40
CMDRConanAAnderson 40 points ago +40 / -0

Nervous protesting noises*

12
reallm 12 points ago +12 / -0

Let's go

35
Bobby126 35 points ago +35 / -0

Those of you criticism their handling of guns. They are not soldiers. They are in fear for their life and whoever else is inside. They are using their 2nd amendment right. WHERE THE FUCK WERE YOU?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
0
AtariArtist 0 points ago +1 / -1

Making popcorn and laughing my ass off. Of course!

33
Toughsky_Shitsky 33 points ago +33 / -0

Waiting for the next logical progression.

If our pussy electeds won't stop this 3rd world nonsense, then Americans will do so using the only remaining remedy.

10
LibertyOverSecurity 10 points ago +10 / -0

From the looks of it we won't be waiting long if they keep pulling these stunts.

8
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Gee. I hope people don't start sniping them. That would be awful and stuff.

4
dixond 4 points ago +4 / -0

Truly terrible.

[goes and sights in on 200yds steel plate...]

2
Sticky 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm somewhat surprised Patriot snipers haven't sent a few messages already...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
32
32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
28
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 28 points ago +28 / -0

They have a fence, and are in a gated community on a private street closed to the public. I'm guessing they are going to get some serious private security. Problem is they are like a block or two from seriously shit areas... The mob is literally within walking distance.

4
AtariArtist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wash U? Yes - yes they are.

5
try4gain 5 points ago +5 / -0

Needs about 5 dogs too

3
LikeAWombatScorned 3 points ago +3 / -0

Definitely.

13
Lurking-My-Life-Away 13 points ago +14 / -1

Great thing they are both lawyers. They might need their skills soon.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
-12
deleted -12 points ago +3 / -15
19
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 19 points ago +19 / -0

Nah, public records show some token level (sub $500) donations to RNC, but not DNC or any specific candidate.

30
repoman 30 points ago +32 / -2

We got a lefty!

14
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 14 points ago +14 / -0

Nah, both have public records of donating to the RNC. Not Trump, just RNC.

3
white_male666 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he meant left handed, from the way he held the gun

0
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Honestly, I don't think he knows how to use the gun... completely crap handling and trigger discipline.

1
Scorpion 1 point ago +3 / -2

Just as bad, then.

30
progressives4Trump 30 points ago +31 / -1

Good for them. On the other hand, someone is going to sneak back to that house late at night and do something stupid.

29
Gunslinger1776 29 points ago +29 / -0

“Fuck around and find out.”

7
Cyer6 7 points ago +7 / -0

They were going to storm and ransack it anyway. I wonder if they voted Dem because if they did, they’re probably regretting that decision there.

4
LittleRedRidingPills 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm struggling to understand why any white people live in St. Louis, with the highest murder rate in America. It makes Chicago seem like a white suburb.

2
AtariArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's East STL. Different city. It's in Illinois.

28
UpTrump 28 points ago +34 / -6

Can they pin him for brandishing? I am not really familiar with gun laws

56
YaBoiJacob 56 points ago +57 / -1

Nope, he was threatened and defended himself

-101
Roadrash -101 points ago +12 / -113

You can’t just pull a firearm simply because you feel threatened. That’s subjective and only half the truth, the other half is a jury deciding if you objectively should’ve felt threatened. If they were in their house and “felt” threatened by protestors walking down the street, doesn’t matter what they were saying, so they got their guns, came outside and started fucking aiming it at people that weren’t even on their property then they’re gonna get charged.

The idiots downvoting this are gonna find themselves in a world of trouble if they think they can go around pointing guns at people like this woman did. Best of luck in jail.

64
Data 64 points ago +67 / -3

You can’t just pull a firearm simply because you feel threatened.

Wrong.

2
TeamMAGA 2 points ago +4 / -2

Right! Liberals FEEL threatened all the time, You have to actually BE threatened.

51
deleted 51 points ago +54 / -3
-64
Roadrash -64 points ago +7 / -71

My God...

So, sitting in your house and hear people protesting going down the street. You decide that you’re in imminent danger even though the “protestors” are walking past other houses, you and your wife decide to grab your firearms and go outside.

i don’t think there’s anything illegal up to this point. Stupid? Absolutely, but not illegal.

It becomes illegal when the woman starts aiming her gun at people protesting down a public sidewalk. You’d also be hard pressed to make the argument that these protestors are exactly the same as the rioters you saw on television in another part of the country.

You want to stand outside with your firearm, whatever. I think most states allow that, but it’s a whole different ballgame when you’re aiming it people.

43
Shermoo 43 points ago +45 / -2

These people were on their property with a mob on their front lawn. You can’t just make your own scenario up and act like that’s what we were talking about.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
28
Demonspawn 28 points ago +28 / -0

They werent, they were on a public sidewalk

No, they weren't on public property. They were trespassing in a gated community.

-31
Roadrash -31 points ago +2 / -33

Speaking of making up our own scenarios, do you have a video of the mob actually on the property?

28
Demonspawn 28 points ago +28 / -0

Here

As soon as they entered the gate, they were trespassing on private property.

11
EpicPede 11 points ago +12 / -1

Are you European or something?

7
SirSeizureSalad 7 points ago +7 / -0

The video linked, didn't you hear one of the leaders tell them to backup off their lawn.

Edit, it was a follow-up video on that thread.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanzoPerez/status/1277404541693169672

5
Grief 5 points ago +5 / -0

Do you even live in the United States? I feel like you're coming at this with zero knowledge of gun laws

4
Shermoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Literally the video we both watched. Two people had their feet in their yard at the end of the video, way after everyone was already retreating. Idk what you want.

22
Harambe 22 points ago +23 / -1

Mega cuckoldry. If I hear a riot down the street, yeah I'm defending my property with visible guns. You're dumb and cucked. Its OK if you are too weak to defend yourself and your family. But acting like others are dumb for doing so? Just shut the fuck up and let the men handle this.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
11
Demonspawn 11 points ago +11 / -0

pointing it at everybody on a public street

That was a private street. BLM went into a gated community and they were the first house inside the gate.

12
ColoradoTrumper45 12 points ago +13 / -1

You clearly do not understand the application of the term "force disparity."

A crowd of protestors is objectively a greater physical threat than these two assumed homeowners. Therefore, they are fully justified in displaying their weapons and showcasing the full risk of attack to the protestors.

Such action has likely dissuaded violent action by the mob.

-20
Roadrash -20 points ago +1 / -21

force disparity doesn’t lower the threshold of having to prove what is objectively reasonable.

Nothing shows the crowd was attacking the homeowners or their property, everything I’ve seen shows the crowd on a public sidewalk/street.

They’re legally justified to carry their firearms, I’m not arguing that. Fuck, I’m not even arguing that I disagree with the spirit of their actions. My point was that there is no way (legally) the woman will be able to prove her subjective belief of fear is objectively reasonable.

9
ColoradoTrumper45 9 points ago +9 / -0

The force disparity between two homeowners and a vocal marching mob lowers the bar on what is objectively reasonable to a point where the standard is meaningless.

Bottom line, this gal and her husband were confronted by a threat, and by displaying their weapons they mitigated that threat. Nobody got shot, nobody burned a house. Her technique was non-existent and amateurish, but she defended her home and her life.

Any DA that draws up charges on this incident is going to lose, first in court and then at the ballot box.

6
OnlyAmerica 6 points ago +6 / -0

You appear to be a Eurocuck.

4
qingchangchong 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=563.031

Subsection 2, part 3: "Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section."

9
_Sully_ 9 points ago +9 / -0

Their mere presence is the threat retard. They can't be there.

7
jbaum517 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is a gate community that they trespassed into. The guards should have shot them before they even reached the houses... need better trained gate men

24
Based_and_proud 24 points ago +24 / -0

You understand that if you wait until they touch you before you defend yourself that you're most likely going to die, right? I can't think of any better reason to display a firearm as a deterrent than a swarm of terrorists feverishly surrounding your home. I know you've seen the videos of what these people do when they get you in their grasp.

-31
Roadrash -31 points ago +5 / -36
  1. they were walking down the street protesting, nothing suggests they were “feverishly surrounding their house”

  2. she was not simply open carrying a firearm, she was screaming at people and aiming it with her finger on the trigger while the people she pointed it at were not even on her property.

  3. I don’t disagree about being prepared, just saying you can’t do what she did because of what might happen because of what you’ve seen happen at another time and place.

19
Staatssicherheit 19 points ago +19 / -0
  1. They were not on the street, but on the couple's lawn. Inside their security gate.

https://twitter.com/KyleKashuv/status/1277441305644347395

  1. Because they were on her property.

  2. They were absolutely right in protecting their home. You need to apologize to them.

-12
Roadrash -12 points ago +2 / -14

If it were on private property than 100% no issues with what they did (again, for the millionth time, never had an issue with the guys actions).

The sign said “private street, residents only” I wonder if that’s considered the private property shared by homeowners (as in they all actually own some of it) or if it’s owned by an HOA. Not that it morally makes any difference, just a curiosity as to protecting ones property.

7
EpicPede 7 points ago +8 / -1

dude you are not gonna make it when SHTF.

12
I-am-Orlando 12 points ago +12 / -0

It was private property and not a public street. https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1277440901896421377?s=20

2
Midnight_Pede 2 points ago +2 / -0

BLM/ANTIFA are terrorist organizations with a plethora of evidence of rioting, looting and causing bodily harm, including death.

They invaded private, secured property.

Any person has a right to arm themselves and confront and deter such known threats to property and person.

0
Based_and_proud 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yeah you're actually right kinda. No problem with the man but the woman wasn't helping.

8
Demonspawn 8 points ago +8 / -0

I just found this out myself: that was a gated community and the protestors/rioters were trespassing.

Given the force disparity in play and the fact they they were already breaking the law by trespassing, I find little wrong with her behavior.

1
Based_and_proud 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, didn't know that. Now you're kinda right

19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
17
I-am-but-an-egg 17 points ago +18 / -1

Texas would like a word with you. castle law FTW

26
deleted 26 points ago +27 / -1
15
AlphaOmaga 15 points ago +16 / -1

Wouldn’t be surprised if the DA red flags their asses then let’s the public know the have been disarmed or in custody. DA there is a massive cunt indeed.

19
DLane1 19 points ago +19 / -0

They appear wealthy enough to file a federal lawsuit against any corrupt DA.

15
ForHumans 15 points ago +15 / -0

They're both rich as fuck attorneys

8
AtariArtist 8 points ago +9 / -1

This is the County tho (edit I was wrong - holy shit that's a big property in the city). Not the city (at least it sure as hell looks like it from the size of the house and the land around it - only places like the Lemp mansion have that kind of profile in the city).

Could be any number of cities out there. People forget there's actually 3 St. Louis(es) - East St. Louis - St. Louis City - and St. Louis County which is generally referred to as 'St. Louis' but is a huge span of cities stretching to St. Charles.

4
Jabroni421 4 points ago +4 / -0

It looks like either those massive houses in central west end or the massive houses lining forest park on lindel blvd. Not exactly the “county”

3
AtariArtist 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought CWE too - but that lot's too big. Lindel ... mmmmaybe? Yes - they have big houses - but that lot - I can't even see a hint of a neighbor. (edit - the house is in fact near Lindell - north of it a bit - but in STL City)

4
Jabroni421 4 points ago +5 / -1

https://www.stlmag.com/design/a-decades-long-renovation-returns-a-midwestern-palazzo-to-it/

This is it, still can’t really tell. Waterman by wash u has houses like that too. They entered the gate in this video, the street is private property:

https://mobile.twitter.com/cassandrarules/status/1277435223412805638?s=21

3
AtariArtist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup that's it alright. The planters and the wall - everything. Good eye - and man that was fast. It's funny that it was part of the Busch family because I was thinking Lemp Mansion at first.

3
Defender110 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why are you drawing attention to their identities? These poor people are suffering enough and are supposedly being doxxed. No need to do it here, too.

2
AtariArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

The article doesn't have their address - in fact the article specifically took it off at least 2 years ago (it was cached however so I could verify it's relation to Forest Park - but I won't link it or say where).

Being a historic property - it's kind of hard to hide it tho - even in STL.

4
runonce 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see you know the DA. Fuckin Massive Cunt. Elected with Soros money

26
americathegr888 26 points ago +27 / -1

Maybe, though they had a gigantic fucking mob of violent people screaming shit at them... so hopefully it wouldn't stick.

14
Oven_Boy86 14 points ago +14 / -0

They can, but it won't stick.

13
Proud_American 13 points ago +13 / -0

I doubt that would be the case. He never pointed it at them. Another video shows the woman pointing at fools.

I think it should be widely accepted, if you show up in a mob to a person’s house, they will be in fear for their life and have the right to shoot before anyone actually steps foot on the property.

10
runonce 10 points ago +10 / -0

If it goes to trial I expect to see 6 hours of footage from Ferguson to the present of the burning, looting, and killing that's taken place in St. Louis along with a multitude of interviews with local politicians, criminals, and activists promoting and condoning all of the above.

25
sustainable_saltmine 25 points ago +25 / -0

the full footage shows pretty clearly this is a gated community and they "let themselves in". the protesters were trespassing. they thought they could just "enter" a gated community as if they had a right.

people forget that roving mobs of "protesters" dont have a right to protest like this. legally, all you can do is find a place out of the way and picket. you cant block roads, you cant just march down any street you want forcing people to listen to you, you cant disturb the peace and you cant basically ruin people's day.

5
LittleRedRidingPills 5 points ago +5 / -0

They're increasingly rationalizing the use of terrorist tactics. Marxists (and militant blacks) truly believe that the ends justify whatever means necessary. That's why they have a long history of terrorism around the world.

These fuckers will quickly turn into a domestic Al Qaeda if these Democrat cities let them. And it looks like they are.

21
Sapito 21 points ago +21 / -0

There are over 350 millions guns in the US, wait until we ALL come out on our front lawns.

21
CaptainWinston 21 points ago +21 / -0

I have had my wife at the range 2X per month for 3 months now.

She received her own pistol Wednesday ran 100 rounds on Saturday.

Fuck these scumbags.

Breach our property line, we have you from 2 feet to 200 yards.

The pigs are hungry too.

4
LittleRedRidingPills 4 points ago +4 / -0

Surveillance cameras are great as well. Mine let me know immediately if it sees a human within 100 yards of my house. I'll have time to make a sandwich and lube my SIG before they reach the door. :)

2
intamin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got a brand or link? Thanks! :)

2
LittleRedRidingPills 2 points ago +2 / -0

I use Nest cameras, and have had good luck with them, but it's worth looking at their current competitors as I haven't looked into it since I installed them over 2 years ago. But they're 1080p and can differentiate humans from simple motion, and integrate nicely with my other 'smart home' stuff.

Good luck!

2
intamin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cool thanks!

2
Mathelm 2 points ago +2 / -0

if it sees a human within 100 yards of my house. I'll have time to make a sandwich and lube my SIG before they reach the door. :)

Please quit shooting Grandmas, they're just going door to door selling cookies and quilts.

0
rubberkidney 0 points ago +1 / -1

hopefully she wont hold it at some weird cocked wrist angle like shes never even considered how a gun works in her life.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
9
Bro_Biden 9 points ago +9 / -0

But it's surrounded by a ghetto it's a beautiful area where the house is but a few blocks away it's a shit hole.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Bro_Biden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go watch the interview these 2 lawyers are Democrats

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
fluffykitten 19 points ago +19 / -0

If he was Korean, he'd totally would have been on the roof

5
whitehouse45 5 points ago +5 / -0

Based.

1
InTheArmsOfThePepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

* jumps down from the rooftop in a sick front flip, sticks the landing, comes up shredding hot lead at the scum.

* after laying waste, proceeds to fuck wife on lawn

18
RyanUpCreek 18 points ago +18 / -0

Firearms work wonders. The beautiful words of the 2A are not a meaningless chant. It is not a poem of the patriots. It is a promise.

3
LittleRedRidingPills 3 points ago +3 / -0

And really, if local governments are going to allow themselves to be taken over by Tyrannical elements that easily and quickly, they are tyrannical by extension and have relinquished their authority.

I'm SO glad I don't live in a Democrat and/or black city right now.

15
veteran299 15 points ago +16 / -1

video of the thugs threatening to take her gun...... https://twitter.com/i/status/1277404541693169672

12
skyhawk 12 points ago +12 / -0

"I was in Afghanistan you fucking bitch!"...yeah, because that gives you the right to loot and ransack these peoples' home.

5
veteran299 5 points ago +6 / -1

he probably was a taliban sympathizer

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
mty_green_go 3 points ago +3 / -0

seems to have been removed. Must have not followed the twitter storyline agenda

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
ThisIsSparta 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is. Also the park where the removed the Christopher Columbus statue

13
Proud_American 13 points ago +13 / -0

Regular Joe, holdin’ off the mob.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
veteran299 2 points ago +3 / -1

i need to put that on my front door

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
13
AmmoHoarder 13 points ago +13 / -0

Graboids say "why do you need large magazines and semi-auto weapons? It's not like you can use them against the military!"

This is why. The Commiecrats send their foot-soldiers in first, not the military. Violent mobs are now an undeniable reality.

7
PartTimeHick 7 points ago +7 / -0

Got a mob safety plan in the house now. Never thought I'd be planning out a home invasion from a mob like it was as likely as a tornado or a fire.

Fucking Democrats. I hope they burn for tearing this beautiful country asunder over the centuries.

12
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 12 points ago +12 / -0

So, these protesters are going down a PRIVATE street that clearly states no trespassing. They literally had to go over / through a gate and fence to get in there. This guy lives right on the corner by the gate. Given how close they live to the public street and how low their stone fence and back gate is. They are going to have serious trouble now that the leftist mob is on them.

12
Slick_Willy 12 points ago +12 / -0

They are 100% fucked badly.

They live in shitsville with the mob feet away.

You know these fucking rioters will throw Molotov Cocktails at that house at night.

They need to install new fencing and fire suppression on the property now.

Also...its fucking sad as fuck that they have to do that in the USA because of the DNC and Democrats and the MSM.

They should all be locked the fuck up for treason.

11
hello-mayo 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm going to take it (the gun) from you.

Yeah, right.

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
1
motm2012 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're actually trump donors.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
RivalPipe 10 points ago +11 / -1

Do I have to keep reposting my joke about this being Retired Dutch from Predator?

9
ForHumans 9 points ago +9 / -0

I call dibs on the next sticky

6
RivalPipe 6 points ago +6 / -0

No kidding! lol

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
travistd6789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Being intentionally random, it is terrorism.

9
turdinthepunch 9 points ago +9 / -0

Find a woman who will stand down a mob with you.

-5
DeepWinter -5 points ago +3 / -8

Find a woman who knows how to hold a pistol correctly, first. She's liable to break her wrist and completely miss her target flailing that gun around like she is!

He's no better either, flagging his woman and keeping his finger on the trigger. Dumbass.

1
Sticky 1 point ago +3 / -2

You're the dumbass, not that courageous couple.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
motm2012 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Where the fuck were you then to save the day?

-1
DeepWinter -1 points ago +1 / -2

As far away from them as possible. Don’t want to be anywhere near a couple that don’t know how to use their own firearm!

9
BeachFriends 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Player 3 has entered the game."

9
capnpyro 9 points ago +9 / -0

that house is a fucking work of art, id be protecting it too

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
runonce 1 point ago +1 / -0

This location is across from Forrest Park. very nice area but no where near the suburbs.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
8
_Sully_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

You don't protest in neighborhoods. Have people forgotten that peaceful protests also require permits. The fact that they are in a neighborhood negates peaceful. It's a show of force and needs to be stopped. I fear the day when people go down the wrong street and just get blasted.

4
sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol permits? woke leftist riots dont need permits. the local leaders are afraid to stand up to them or are complicit so they wont require permits

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

21 arrests in my town for failure to disperse after the police escorted a group that was protesting without a permit. Cops were accommodating, especially with how easy it is to get a permit. You can do the whole thing online and I bet if you called the sheriff's office you'd be able to get them to sign for one of these things.

2
_Sully_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm just saying they are suppose to get them. Obviously that's out the window now.

1
Sticky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why? If that doesn't happen when They storm your gates when will it ever happen? All this gun talk here seems to be a larp when it comes to actually using them.

7
Abovethefray 7 points ago +7 / -0

Real South Africa stuff, right in our great country. This shit has to be quashed, democrats will tear our nation apart.

7
Bobby126 7 points ago +7 / -0

Both of them are flagging unnecessarily. But can you blame them? They are doing the best they can to defend themselves. They are fearing for their lives. Who else is inside the home that they are trying to protect. I wish some of use pedes could have been there to lend a hand.

7
CannonballJunior 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good for this couple. God bless them.

7
tiamat 7 points ago +8 / -1

shes holding that pistol likes its a tv remote, they couldve shot each other a dozen times

7
turribleNightWork 7 points ago +7 / -0

This qualifies as a deescalation of violence and defensive use of a firearm. This just helped justify why homeonerrs should have a firearm against raging communist mobs.

6
OGAmerica 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck these evil leftists for bringing America to this level, it is time to push back hard.

6
Magastein143 6 points ago +6 / -0

I love this couple. Everyone needs to do this