If anyone remembers, 4 years ago Fbianon said, "My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, . . .. Many, many people are involved." So yeah, you're correct.
From other things we were told, if they weren't being extorted by somebody, they were in the pocket of certain people, places or things. I think they are all terrified their particular crime/crimes would be revealed if they don't do as instructed now, and it would be the end of them, one way or another, or the money train will stop, or things that they've been promised won't materialize. So they are all guilty of something treasonous, and therefore, all trying to save their respective asses by going along with this coup. They can't possibly think what we are seeing is OK, or even what they really want. It's just the path of least resistance, and they probably just don't feel they have a choice at this point. JMHO.
Meanwhile - Trump should immediately order the DOJ to investigate and find out exactly which John Roberts is listed on the Lolita Express flight logs to Epstein Island.
I believe it was two children. Could be wrong. I know there was some shady business about it, like shuffling the kids around different countries. Cause elites can do that kind of crap and get away with it.
He basically skirted Irish adoption law by flying pregnant women out of the country so they could give birth abroad. Not only will he to go extraordinary lengths to procure kids, he was also on Epstein’s plane.
I agree he is no where near the accolades put upon him when he was going through the vetting process. I am starting to see that a Justice Like Brett Kavanau is what we should shoot for. If he is hated and demonized then he is probably good.
If the violent crime was committed prior to citizenship, they should be deportable.
If the violent crime was commented after citizenship, they should not be deportable.
Naturalization has a "Good moral character" clause - if the violent crime was committed prior to naturalization, then they would not have been classified of having "good moral character" and as such, the naturalization should be rescinded.
All the justices are part of the judicial ruling class. This form of government was never going to allow abortion to go away no matter who we elect no matter who the judges are.
They need aborted baby tissue and stem cells to do what will soon be trillions in biomed research and development. no aborted babies, no vaccines, no expensive medicines for diseases resulting from vaccines.
You are free to choose to abort or not. They ensure a certain percent of women will suffer economic hardship such that they do choose to abort or conditions will deteriorate until other women choose to abort.
If we only allowed abortions for babies with significant disease and in cases of rape there would still be fetal tissue, and also from miscarriage. But there wouldn’t be the convenience of abortion as a form of birth control. Maybe there would be less but they’d be more judicial (NPI) in how they use it.
The left won't leave you alone. In red states where we see abortion as an abomination they will force it down our throats via the judicial branch. Fuck communists.
State’s rights should be the way things work UNLESS it violates the constitution, the state tries to go softer on immigration, or it is a trade/military issue.
Honestly I think his ruling was worse than just “you can’t ask about citizenship.” He ruled that it’s totally okay to ask it, but Trump didn’t give a good enough reason so he’s saying no.
If it doesn’t violate American law then IDGAF. If it’s legal in America he should just strike a bargain with Trump to confess in exchange for Trump ensuring that the kids stay in the USA and give Roberts immunity.
I mean he seems to be a good parent, I don’t understand why Ireland banned foreign adoption when they used to ban abortion...
I don't think they have anything on him; he's just a deep state neocon bush appointee who's going along with the nevertrumpers - do anything and everything possible to hurt trump whenever wherever possible...right now Roberts would be the 5th vote to outlaw the cure for cancer if it meant getting trump out of office
Let this be a fucking lesson to every fucking person in here - they hate us. do not vote for "them"
Around the time of the fake impeachment, George Soros made a statement that "John Roberts might have some surprises for us." Soros has Roberts for sure.
Try doing a search for this and that's all the proof you'll need. It's been neatly scrubbed from the internet. Likely part of the deal for his compliance. You can't even turn up clear information on foreign adoption of Irish citizens. This seems to go pretty deep. Roberts is all sorts of crooked.
Ireland has a law prohibiting the adoption of Irish children outside of Ireland. It would be hypocritical at best for the Chief Justice to be a law breaker. I suppose it could also open a can of worms about the legitimacy of the adoption itself. I don't know if this story about Roberts' kids is even true, but it's out there...Rush Limbaugh mentioned it today. Rush thinks Roberts just detests Trump and seeks acceptance in the cocktail party circuit inside the beltway.
Well, it might raise all sorts of questions about how the kids got to Latin America. Were they smuggled there? Did Roberts pay for them, and if so, who did he pay...the mother, or some smuggler, or some agency that's making big money off of it? And it raises questions about the Roberts own potential biases. Jane Sullivan Roberts has deep ties to Ireland. Does she think the Irish are superior to other races? Why didn't they adopt a Latin American child? It would also be pretty exceptional for the Chief Justice of SCOTUS to be a scofflaw. Again, this is all rumor.
I don't think si... All of these idiots like Obama are tied up in the social game in DC and so fucking worried about their legacy and how history will remember them that I don't even think it would require them to have that much dirt on him for him to bend the knee.... Just so he can make it to retirement unscathed, as far as thats concerned...
And THIS is what can be used to get rid of him. Aside from all the other things we've heard him accused of, this one is treason and the most effective charge against him.
I'm sure it's true and I'm sure he knows it's coming. POS is desperate.
Same exact case was in Texas a few years ago and he voted to uphold that law because the court was still 5-4 but now that its 5-4 'conservative' he votes the opposite on the same law but purposely did not write up a reason this time.
How can you change your reasoning when its purely based on the make up of the court when it comes to the constitutionality of a law in question?
He is fucking disgusting and 100% they have something on him and he is under control.
That's a weak excuse. Millions of infants will be chopped up alive and he was the only one who could have protected them. Do you think scotus precedent should have been used to prevent the freeing of slaves?
The ruling class of American government alone is not the top of the totem pole. There is a "they" even above him but like everyone else who "they" have dirt on, it's typically just a contingency in case they start getting cold feet over the plan they have always been on board with from the start.
When I saw the wetworks at the vineyard podesta email and then the fake movie script/plot email to podesta about assassinating a big person in government, and it contained a map with a pointer pointing directly to that ranch in texas that scalia was killed, and discussion of how much it would cost for "the movie", i freaked the fuck out. it's too much of a coincidence. scalia was assasinated by podestas/clintons/obama.
Dubyas legacy is a dumpster fire. No Child Left Behind has destroyed education, the PATRIOT USA Act was a totalitarian wet dream, the Iraq and Afghan wars have proven to be both fraudulent and utterly useless with the highest cost being our men and women in uniform, TARP was a massive dick punch to the American taxpayer bailing out the money changers of Wall Street and auto manufacturers in Detroit, and selecting Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, Condolezza Rice, John Bolton, Hank Paulson, and countless other worthless cabinet members (not to mention Dick Cheney and John Roberts) that helped destroy American privacy rights and supported regime changes in multiple nations that destabilized the Middle East. The only thing George W. Bush got right was 9/11 and his show of strength on the international stage, but, even then, it was debatable how much authority he had at the time and how capable he was as an American leader.
Roberts always seems to side with the left on decisions that would cause outcry from the media if he had sided with the constitution. It seems like he is more concerned with the media image of the court than with the constitution.
It took me 30 seconds to source. Do your own research next time, learn to research and to critically think for yourself instead of waiting for someone else to do the thinking for you. We expect better around here.
The burden of proof belongs to the one making the claim. There are too many false claims on the internet (like the original "Costa Rica" mistake) for anyone to bother wasting their time on something they don't know about that may very well just end up being fake news.
Don't believe someone's comment on an Internet forum? So go look it up yourself and find out if they're full of shit or not. I'm not here to do your work for you, either believe what random anonymous people say on the Internet or go and verify whether their claims are true or not. Fuck I'm sick of shit like this. Go use the Internet for yourself and DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. THINK FOR YOURSELF. This isn't a fucking courtroom where the "burden of proof" rests on the shoulders of some random guy sitting at his desk at work, this is a fucking web forum. GO THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Don't believe someone's comment on an Internet forum? So go look it up yourself and find out if they're full of shit or not. I'm not here to do your work for you
Alternatively I can disregard your comment altogether because I don't have time to look up every single unsourced claim any random moron on the internet decides to post, especially not if I'm ACTUALLY researching and thinking for myself.
It's because I think for myself that I have no intention of putting up with your lazy bullshit of not sourcing your own fucking claims. That's your job, not mine. If you make an unsourced claim and complain about people wanting the source you might as well be admitting that you expected people to believe it without the source in the first place.
So you can go around and parrot the allcaps "think for yourself" mantra all you want because it took someone telling your to think for yourself to actually do it but some of us have done it from the start.
It should be expected that as the one making the claim that he would have sufficient knowledge on it to know where to find a source for it. That's why the burden of proof belongs to the one making the claims. It's nobody's job but his own to source his arguments. No excuses.
Flight logs aren't the lynchpin in the theory that he pulled some shady stuff to adopt his kids, and that this is being held over him. I'm not pushing anything as fact, but it seems like they have on him and that's about a good a place to start as any.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution grants plenary power to the president of the United States to nominate, and with the advice and consent of the United States Senate, appoint a chief justice, who serves until they resign, retire, are impeached and convicted, or die.
Democrats vet their supreme court picks very carefully. But if Trump asked Gorsuch too many questions, Democrats would say it's improper or something and impeach him.
I remember vaguely his senate confirmation hearing and they relentlessly grilled him on roe v wade. He refused to rule on hypothetical cases during the hearing. Guess we know now.
Roberts is ruling class. The judicial class recruits from DOJ stormtroopers based on how hard they fuck the rest of us. There’s no voting our way to a better government, us or the antifablm people. They know it, we should wake up to it too. This government isn’t working for anyone except that ruling class that is living in mortal sin and absolute scandal.
They will never let abortion go now, there is a market for aborted baby tissue. Billions and soon trillions in industry and research require a significant supply of baby tissue, they need stem cell and such to grow vaccines even. This means that the socioeconomic conditions that determine women “choosing” to have an abortion must necessarily be built into the system or else theres no vaccines no new expensive medicines for diseases arising from those vaccines. In other words, this government will never allow economic conditions such that no woman need ever choose an abortion from economic uncertainty and hardship. If some woman didn’t choose to have an abortion then some other woman would have suffered increasing systematic economic hardship until she chose to have an abortion.
Just as homelessness is built into the system, if a homeless dies or gets a job someone else has to become homeless. If there were enough homes for everyone there would be no appreciation in value and no profit for banks; they’d deteriorate far below inflation. “The poor will always be with you.”
We can pluck a hair from you and grow stem cells out of it right now. That's not why they encourage abortions. They encourage it so that blacks and other minorities never become a stronger political force than they are now.
Here’s the significance of this... for all the liberal women who proclaim “women’s rights, etc”... this ruling makes abortions MORE dangerous to women (not to mention the baby that’s killed in the process). A doctor with hospital privileges would be known in the community, held to a higher standard, and this would be a safeguard to the women getting abortions. PP and other abortion clinics have doctors come in on the sly, from out of town, unknown to the community, and do the slicing and dicing. In some instances they are letting untrained non medical staff do abortions. So while butchering babies these unknown “doctors” are at a higher likelihood butchering women who end up in the ED or with serious complications. There is nothing safe or good about abortion.
Roberts just hates Drumpf and his deep state handlers have instructed him that and Trump scotus "wins", and here's the important part - that might drives voters to vote for Drumpf are absolutely not allowed.
Sure, throw Drumpf a win on some bureaucratic language that allows him to fire someone, but a big win on abortion, immigration? No way
I think he’s likely a child trafficker. His adopted children are Irish but he did not adopt them from Ireland which has very strict restrictions on adoptions especially to foreigners. He “adopted” them through Brazil which has very lax restrictions on adoptions. How did two Irish children with different parents both wind up in Brazil to be adopted by Roberts and his wife after they struggled to be approved to adopt from Ireland?
Well, that was the reasoning that led Trump to pick Gorsuch, and look what happened there...Gorsuch was under fifty, he would last for 30 years...but he didn't even make it to three without betraying us. What a filthy, arrogant coward we're stuck with on the Court.
In two previous abortion cases, Roberts had favored restrictions.
The Louisiana law is virtually identical to one in Texas that the court struck down in 2016.
This means that he only pretended to be conservative because he knew the law would be struck down anyway! He left the leftist judges do it and voted against abortion only to save appearances!
This loss was expected. The case was identical to the one in Texas that also lost a ruling by the Supreme Court. I don't see this as a loss per se, I see us understanding where we need to go next. Don't get down over this one.
I believe the approach was wrong much like with Daca. We definitely learned but it pushes it close to Nov. Doubt we will see it revisited before then. I also doubt Trumps legal team.
I hope the “never Trump” clowns see what a vote for Biden or a non-vote any other way against Trump will do to their previous sensibilities. Absolutely moronic to not vote Trump now out of some ridiculous stance for “true conservatism.” Your true conservatism will be relegated to the history books(it already is) the more power the Democrats take. Roberts is beyond us now. The man despises Trump and may as well be considered the 5-4 liberal, ruling Justice almost every time. He had failed to vote conservative over 80% of the time this year. If Trump fails to get re-elected and we can’t get rid of either RBG or Breyer, this country is DONE.
The real problem with John Roberts is that he runs the Court in a way where he's just trying to mediate and throw each side a bone now and then instead of following the law. I also think he's compromised because his decisions are not grounded in rational thought.
Today they ruled the structure of Warren's Consumer Protection Board is unconstitutional, giving POTUS authority to fire/hire whoever runs it. It was a split decision (5/4).
I think he meant to say that the SCOTUS throws us a bone every now and then while siding with the far left on every major issue ever. Otherwise, he hasn't been paying attention.
He's been compromised since the Obama administration. We need him retired and replaced ASAP. Screw going for a balanced replacement as well. I want a hard core conservative judge as a replacement. The left is stacking their extremists on the courts, we need opposing extreme conservatives. No middle ground.
He dissented last time, but agreed now in order to maintain precedent? What the fuck is this guys problem? The supreme court also set a precedent for racial segregation, should we go back to that? Total scumbag
I'm not familiar with the Texas case, can anyone educate me on "how" and "why" that case was ruled (which is what Roberts cites).
I remember reading Roberts' Obamacare ruling. Basically "it's not constitutional, but I'm going to allow it." When I read that, it became clear to me that Roberts sees his position as SCJ as a political/legislative one. In a best case scenario he's a self-righteous authoritarian, happily abusing his position to impart his vision of America on its citizens. In a worst case, he's totally compromised. I think both are equally bad, and he needs to go.
At this point what do conservatives even conserve? How do we control the Senate, The White House, and The Supreme Court and still lose every single case and appease BLM?
And probably a pedophile as well.
My thoughts exactly. These tentacles of the coup go very deep.
fire everyone except trump
If anyone remembers, 4 years ago Fbianon said, "My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, . . .. Many, many people are involved." So yeah, you're correct.
From other things we were told, if they weren't being extorted by somebody, they were in the pocket of certain people, places or things. I think they are all terrified their particular crime/crimes would be revealed if they don't do as instructed now, and it would be the end of them, one way or another, or the money train will stop, or things that they've been promised won't materialize. So they are all guilty of something treasonous, and therefore, all trying to save their respective asses by going along with this coup. They can't possibly think what we are seeing is OK, or even what they really want. It's just the path of least resistance, and they probably just don't feel they have a choice at this point. JMHO.
But muh common name
Meanwhile - Trump should immediately order the DOJ to investigate and find out exactly which John Roberts is listed on the Lolita Express flight logs to Epstein Island.
So we can judge that John Roberts right now.
#WhoIsJohnRoberts
Fuckin Ouch!!! I didn’t know he had been to The Pedophile Fantasy Island 🌴 🍕 🌴 🍕
Damn I didn’t know that. Yup he’s a pedo
I believe it was two children. Could be wrong. I know there was some shady business about it, like shuffling the kids around different countries. Cause elites can do that kind of crap and get away with it.
He basically skirted Irish adoption law by flying pregnant women out of the country so they could give birth abroad. Not only will he to go extraordinary lengths to procure kids, he was also on Epstein’s plane.
I mean, if the kids were NOT abused and going to good parents then I don’t have an issue with the backdoor adoptions.
Very poor choice of words
Why Ireland?
Old and rare bloodlines
I'm calling it now, they have something on him. He may as well be a leftist justice on the SC with his recent run of rulings.
I agree he is no where near the accolades put upon him when he was going through the vetting process. I am starting to see that a Justice Like Brett Kavanau is what we should shoot for. If he is hated and demonized then he is probably good.
makes sense to me
Naturalized U.S. citizens guilty of a violent crime must be deported to CHOP.
What it he was convicted of beating a commie?
If the violent crime was committed prior to citizenship, they should be deportable.
If the violent crime was commented after citizenship, they should not be deportable.
Naturalization has a "Good moral character" clause - if the violent crime was committed prior to naturalization, then they would not have been classified of having "good moral character" and as such, the naturalization should be rescinded.
You think US citizens should be deportable? That doesn't make any sense.
Yes, but while I'm all for prosecuting terrorists, to be honest gitmo-img them is probably unconstitutional as well.
All the justices are part of the judicial ruling class. This form of government was never going to allow abortion to go away no matter who we elect no matter who the judges are.
They need aborted baby tissue and stem cells to do what will soon be trillions in biomed research and development. no aborted babies, no vaccines, no expensive medicines for diseases resulting from vaccines.
You are free to choose to abort or not. They ensure a certain percent of women will suffer economic hardship such that they do choose to abort or conditions will deteriorate until other women choose to abort.
I'm scared to ask.... What diseases do you think are caused by which vaccines?
You can check out non polo induced flaccid paralysis and simian virus 40. Also the deformed mouse stem cells that Judy Mikovic blew the whistle on.
You can get stem cells from basically anything. Fetal tissue is not needed.
If we only allowed abortions for babies with significant disease and in cases of rape there would still be fetal tissue, and also from miscarriage. But there wouldn’t be the convenience of abortion as a form of birth control. Maybe there would be less but they’d be more judicial (NPI) in how they use it.
And remember he ruled that we couldn't ask the citizenship question on our 2020 census.
I wrote "he ruled" and my mind stumbled - is he king, I asked my self?
It's so fucked up that such a topic like abortion has to be decided by the courts, and not by the elected representatives.
Does the constitution talk about abortion? No? Then SCOTUS should fuck off and let the legislative branch decide.
The left won't leave you alone. In red states where we see abortion as an abomination they will force it down our throats via the judicial branch. Fuck communists.
Sanctuary cities: muh state rights
Abortion: sorry states, federal law is supreme
Their hypocrisy is disgusting
State’s rights should be the way things work UNLESS it violates the constitution, the state tries to go softer on immigration, or it is a trade/military issue.
Honestly I think his ruling was worse than just “you can’t ask about citizenship.” He ruled that it’s totally okay to ask it, but Trump didn’t give a good enough reason so he’s saying no.
Why the fuck does an unelected judge get to decide what does and does not constitute a "good reason" to do something?
The rumor circulating is that he and his wife illegally adopted Irish children that were funneled through Latin America.
It allegedly is a violation of Ireland's laws, not those of the US.
If it doesn’t violate American law then IDGAF. If it’s legal in America he should just strike a bargain with Trump to confess in exchange for Trump ensuring that the kids stay in the USA and give Roberts immunity.
I mean he seems to be a good parent, I don’t understand why Ireland banned foreign adoption when they used to ban abortion...
He illegally adopted his irish or Scottish child, however he went about it.
I don't think they have anything on him; he's just a deep state neocon bush appointee who's going along with the nevertrumpers - do anything and everything possible to hurt trump whenever wherever possible...right now Roberts would be the 5th vote to outlaw the cure for cancer if it meant getting trump out of office
Let this be a fucking lesson to every fucking person in here - they hate us. do not vote for "them"
Around the time of the fake impeachment, George Soros made a statement that "John Roberts might have some surprises for us." Soros has Roberts for sure.
In what way, I don't know. But he's got him.
The rumor is that he illegally adopted Irish children who were funneled through Latin America.
Prol!y more worse stuff too. 😐
Try doing a search for this and that's all the proof you'll need. It's been neatly scrubbed from the internet. Likely part of the deal for his compliance. You can't even turn up clear information on foreign adoption of Irish citizens. This seems to go pretty deep. Roberts is all sorts of crooked.
What compliance does Roberts have?
As long as the kids weren’t stolen from their parents/guardians that doesn’t sound that bad? There’s got to be more to it.
Ireland has a law prohibiting the adoption of Irish children outside of Ireland. It would be hypocritical at best for the Chief Justice to be a law breaker. I suppose it could also open a can of worms about the legitimacy of the adoption itself. I don't know if this story about Roberts' kids is even true, but it's out there...Rush Limbaugh mentioned it today. Rush thinks Roberts just detests Trump and seeks acceptance in the cocktail party circuit inside the beltway.
Huh, interesting. Well that’s not good but certainly not dirty enough to buy a justice. I feel like there’s got to be something else...
Well, it might raise all sorts of questions about how the kids got to Latin America. Were they smuggled there? Did Roberts pay for them, and if so, who did he pay...the mother, or some smuggler, or some agency that's making big money off of it? And it raises questions about the Roberts own potential biases. Jane Sullivan Roberts has deep ties to Ireland. Does she think the Irish are superior to other races? Why didn't they adopt a Latin American child? It would also be pretty exceptional for the Chief Justice of SCOTUS to be a scofflaw. Again, this is all rumor.
I don't think si... All of these idiots like Obama are tied up in the social game in DC and so fucking worried about their legacy and how history will remember them that I don't even think it would require them to have that much dirt on him for him to bend the knee.... Just so he can make it to retirement unscathed, as far as thats concerned...
he is definitely compromised. They've got aome king of dirt on him
One thing I can tell you is that his son goes to where I went to school.
Cardigan Mountain School
Roberts himself mingles with those parents and teachers, and I can say with certainty, 95% of them hate Trump.
This is an underrated comment. The subtleties and behaviors of these cucked judges tell you what they're all about. Birds of a feather....
Would be shame if someone caught him on camera or a hot microphone.
OUT OUT OUT
And THIS is what can be used to get rid of him. Aside from all the other things we've heard him accused of, this one is treason and the most effective charge against him.
I'm sure it's true and I'm sure he knows it's coming. POS is desperate.
First time he has backed abortion rights. They almost certainly have something on him and this is proof.
He’s a child trafficker.
Man I can’t wait for that huge bubble to burst so many people gonna go away forever.
Same exact case was in Texas a few years ago and he voted to uphold that law because the court was still 5-4 but now that its 5-4 'conservative' he votes the opposite on the same law but purposely did not write up a reason this time.
How can you change your reasoning when its purely based on the make up of the court when it comes to the constitutionality of a law in question?
He is fucking disgusting and 100% they have something on him and he is under control.
That's a weak excuse. Millions of infants will be chopped up alive and he was the only one who could have protected them. Do you think scotus precedent should have been used to prevent the freeing of slaves?
This. So many times this. Why is it not plaster all over his house yet?
You need to understand he is a supreme court justice, the chief of the chiefs of the judicial class, which under the rule of law is the ruling class.
Chief Justice Roberts IS “They”
If you don’t understand this then you don’t understand a thing about the government and world you live in. It is a lot worse than you think.
The ruling class of American government alone is not the top of the totem pole. There is a "they" even above him but like everyone else who "they" have dirt on, it's typically just a contingency in case they start getting cold feet over the plan they have always been on board with from the start.
We've all been hoping RGB would drop dead but I'll take Roberts at this point. He's the right age for a heart attack, right?
If he did die of a heart attack, we would never know. It’s customary to not do an autopsy on a Supreme Court Justice.
"Must've died from a pillow infected with coronavirus"
When I saw the wetworks at the vineyard podesta email and then the fake movie script/plot email to podesta about assassinating a big person in government, and it contained a map with a pointer pointing directly to that ranch in texas that scalia was killed, and discussion of how much it would cost for "the movie", i freaked the fuck out. it's too much of a coincidence. scalia was assasinated by podestas/clintons/obama.
lol
Kind of like Antonin Scalia magically dying before his time. His passing has always seemed Epstein like.
Please God.
The George W Bush legacy.
Yup deep state RINOs keeping their tyranny alive.
Dubyas legacy is a dumpster fire. No Child Left Behind has destroyed education, the PATRIOT USA Act was a totalitarian wet dream, the Iraq and Afghan wars have proven to be both fraudulent and utterly useless with the highest cost being our men and women in uniform, TARP was a massive dick punch to the American taxpayer bailing out the money changers of Wall Street and auto manufacturers in Detroit, and selecting Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, Condolezza Rice, John Bolton, Hank Paulson, and countless other worthless cabinet members (not to mention Dick Cheney and John Roberts) that helped destroy American privacy rights and supported regime changes in multiple nations that destabilized the Middle East. The only thing George W. Bush got right was 9/11 and his show of strength on the international stage, but, even then, it was debatable how much authority he had at the time and how capable he was as an American leader.
Dude didn't get 9/11 right. Went right out there and said be nice to muzzies now.
Didn't Bush open the borders in a speech he gave?(there was an article sourced on T_d)
He may have, I don’t recall, the favorite phrase of Hillary Clinton.
Wish he's go hunting in Texas.
Dick? Dick is that you?
I think he's making a Scalia reference, not Cheney.
roberts is definitely compromised
Remember when Schumer stood on the steps of the Supreme Court and threatened the Justices in a speech?
Yeah, they've got something big on him and whatever it is Schumer knows about it.
Amen. Great verse, great reminder. Thank you!
Nice
I love the grammar of this; very powerful
Roberts always seems to side with the left on decisions that would cause outcry from the media if he had sided with the constitution. It seems like he is more concerned with the media image of the court than with the constitution.
But we can’t afford more protests...
I’m sorry but we cannot prioritize abortion when everything else is going on.
LOL
Words matter. I say it all the time. People in day to day life call me "long winded" because I choose my words carefully.
An underrated personality trait.
He also bought two Irish kids in Costa Rica, also known as "child trafficking."
It was Brazil not Costa Rica
It took me 30 seconds to source. Do your own research next time, learn to research and to critically think for yourself instead of waiting for someone else to do the thinking for you. We expect better around here.
https://heavy.com/news/2017/01/jack-josie-roberts-john-roberts-children-family-adopted-inauguration-supreme-court-chief-justice-jane-ages/
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/the_ghost_and_john_roberts.html
http://spookdblog.blogspot.com/2018/11/chief-justice-roberts-blackmailed.html
The burden of proof belongs to the one making the claim. There are too many false claims on the internet (like the original "Costa Rica" mistake) for anyone to bother wasting their time on something they don't know about that may very well just end up being fake news.
Don't believe someone's comment on an Internet forum? So go look it up yourself and find out if they're full of shit or not. I'm not here to do your work for you, either believe what random anonymous people say on the Internet or go and verify whether their claims are true or not. Fuck I'm sick of shit like this. Go use the Internet for yourself and DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. THINK FOR YOURSELF. This isn't a fucking courtroom where the "burden of proof" rests on the shoulders of some random guy sitting at his desk at work, this is a fucking web forum. GO THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Alternatively I can disregard your comment altogether because I don't have time to look up every single unsourced claim any random moron on the internet decides to post, especially not if I'm ACTUALLY researching and thinking for myself.
It's because I think for myself that I have no intention of putting up with your lazy bullshit of not sourcing your own fucking claims. That's your job, not mine. If you make an unsourced claim and complain about people wanting the source you might as well be admitting that you expected people to believe it without the source in the first place.
So you can go around and parrot the allcaps "think for yourself" mantra all you want because it took someone telling your to think for yourself to actually do it but some of us have done it from the start.
He took 30 seconds, he claims. Innocent until proven guilty.
It should be expected that as the one making the claim that he would have sufficient knowledge on it to know where to find a source for it. That's why the burden of proof belongs to the one making the claims. It's nobody's job but his own to source his arguments. No excuses.
There was some evidence, but a supreme court justice ruled that it was inadmissible so we can't rely on it. /s
I'm sure there's just cold hard evidence of this sitting around for all the world to see.
Flight logs aren't the lynchpin in the theory that he pulled some shady stuff to adopt his kids, and that this is being held over him. I'm not pushing anything as fact, but it seems like they have on him and that's about a good a place to start as any.
It’s pretty obvious he need to be impeached. Trump should just go ahead and replace him with Clarence Thomas.
Can President Trump do that?
According to commiepedia:
^ This the problem.
Worst pick ever for SCOTUS.
I agree.
Also I noticed that betrayal only happens on the conservatives side, but never on the liberal side, I wonder why?
Questionable characters. They are not true conservatives but rather wolves (democrats) in sheep clothing(RINOs).
Conservatives are always slowly giving up ground, never gaining any. Slow steady march to communism
Democrats vet their supreme court picks very carefully. But if Trump asked Gorsuch too many questions, Democrats would say it's improper or something and impeach him.
I remember vaguely his senate confirmation hearing and they relentlessly grilled him on roe v wade. He refused to rule on hypothetical cases during the hearing. Guess we know now.
This is a spiritual battle, ultimately. Of this I have no doubt.
Look at these numbers. It’s soul crushing.
http://www.numberofabortions.com/
Pray, fast, vote, donate to your local pregnancy crisis center, pray and fast some more.
Amen
Roberts is ruling class. The judicial class recruits from DOJ stormtroopers based on how hard they fuck the rest of us. There’s no voting our way to a better government, us or the antifablm people. They know it, we should wake up to it too. This government isn’t working for anyone except that ruling class that is living in mortal sin and absolute scandal.
They will never let abortion go now, there is a market for aborted baby tissue. Billions and soon trillions in industry and research require a significant supply of baby tissue, they need stem cell and such to grow vaccines even. This means that the socioeconomic conditions that determine women “choosing” to have an abortion must necessarily be built into the system or else theres no vaccines no new expensive medicines for diseases arising from those vaccines. In other words, this government will never allow economic conditions such that no woman need ever choose an abortion from economic uncertainty and hardship. If some woman didn’t choose to have an abortion then some other woman would have suffered increasing systematic economic hardship until she chose to have an abortion.
Just as homelessness is built into the system, if a homeless dies or gets a job someone else has to become homeless. If there were enough homes for everyone there would be no appreciation in value and no profit for banks; they’d deteriorate far below inflation. “The poor will always be with you.”
We can pluck a hair from you and grow stem cells out of it right now. That's not why they encourage abortions. They encourage it so that blacks and other minorities never become a stronger political force than they are now.
Yeah, that too.
Here’s the significance of this... for all the liberal women who proclaim “women’s rights, etc”... this ruling makes abortions MORE dangerous to women (not to mention the baby that’s killed in the process). A doctor with hospital privileges would be known in the community, held to a higher standard, and this would be a safeguard to the women getting abortions. PP and other abortion clinics have doctors come in on the sly, from out of town, unknown to the community, and do the slicing and dicing. In some instances they are letting untrained non medical staff do abortions. So while butchering babies these unknown “doctors” are at a higher likelihood butchering women who end up in the ED or with serious complications. There is nothing safe or good about abortion.
Underrated comment.
Even if you are pro-choice, what is the logic in allowing any random Joe to perform it? It's still a medical procedure.
With all the fucking money they make on abortion they could at least accept a law that does nothing but requiring a medical standard.
I agree. I’m torn on abortion but you have to have safety standards.
Roberts just hates Drumpf and his deep state handlers have instructed him that and Trump scotus "wins", and here's the important part - that might drives voters to vote for Drumpf are absolutely not allowed.
Sure, throw Drumpf a win on some bureaucratic language that allows him to fire someone, but a big win on abortion, immigration? No way
I think pedes are going to be more pissed off and be more likely to go and vote if they understand the SCOTUS is 3 conservatives and 6 liberals
I think he’s likely a child trafficker. His adopted children are Irish but he did not adopt them from Ireland which has very strict restrictions on adoptions especially to foreigners. He “adopted” them through Brazil which has very lax restrictions on adoptions. How did two Irish children with different parents both wind up in Brazil to be adopted by Roberts and his wife after they struggled to be approved to adopt from Ireland?
Oprah's Father John baby-mill fuckery.
Well, that was the reasoning that led Trump to pick Gorsuch, and look what happened there...Gorsuch was under fifty, he would last for 30 years...but he didn't even make it to three without betraying us. What a filthy, arrogant coward we're stuck with on the Court.
What's the difference between being ruled by a dictator and by an unelected judge?
When the judicial branch exceeds its authority and legislates from the bench it has no legitimacy.
Right. Besides, a dictator can ultimately be held accountable if he fucks up the country so bad that there's a coup or a foreign power invades.
A judge can do literally whatever he wants with no consequences for his person.
What a fucking snake, read this:
This means that he only pretended to be conservative because he knew the law would be struck down anyway! He left the leftist judges do it and voted against abortion only to save appearances!
So much for “black lives matter”
At some point maybe people will realize that there is no political solution to the death of America.
It will be too late of course but whatever.
Don't worry, lots of people here know that - we're getting ready for when we can start. The election will probably split the country in two
This loss was expected. The case was identical to the one in Texas that also lost a ruling by the Supreme Court. I don't see this as a loss per se, I see us understanding where we need to go next. Don't get down over this one.
Except Roberts voted the other way in the Texas case then reversed himself here.
What the fuck is that sort of logic or lack there of.
Its wording. I am starting to question Trumps legal team. This happened with DACA. All it does is delay until after Nov election. It seems purposeful.
I agree. His legal team is either incompetent, or intentionally sabotaging his efforts to MAGA.
How? We would've won is Roberts wasn't a massive cuck. We don't even have the SC on our side now
Same as DACA. Seems wording of Trumps legal team screwed us again.
So it was a wording issue any this can be rewritten?
I believe the approach was wrong much like with Daca. We definitely learned but it pushes it close to Nov. Doubt we will see it revisited before then. I also doubt Trumps legal team.
They made it clear where we need to go next 🔫
Just need permission from Trump and it can begin
I hope the “never Trump” clowns see what a vote for Biden or a non-vote any other way against Trump will do to their previous sensibilities. Absolutely moronic to not vote Trump now out of some ridiculous stance for “true conservatism.” Your true conservatism will be relegated to the history books(it already is) the more power the Democrats take. Roberts is beyond us now. The man despises Trump and may as well be considered the 5-4 liberal, ruling Justice almost every time. He had failed to vote conservative over 80% of the time this year. If Trump fails to get re-elected and we can’t get rid of either RBG or Breyer, this country is DONE.
It's nice to hope, but they were never "true conservatives" to begin with.
The real problem with John Roberts is that he runs the Court in a way where he's just trying to mediate and throw each side a bone now and then instead of following the law. I also think he's compromised because his decisions are not grounded in rational thought.
And what bone exactly has he thrown us?
He throws bones only to the other side
Today they ruled the structure of Warren's Consumer Protection Board is unconstitutional, giving POTUS authority to fire/hire whoever runs it. It was a split decision (5/4).
Does that balance: DACA, LGBT special privileges, sanctuary cities, and rejecting 2A cases?
And that's just in the last few weeks
I think he meant to say that the SCOTUS throws us a bone every now and then while siding with the far left on every major issue ever. Otherwise, he hasn't been paying attention.
Another Bush betrayal...
He's been compromised since the Obama administration. We need him retired and replaced ASAP. Screw going for a balanced replacement as well. I want a hard core conservative judge as a replacement. The left is stacking their extremists on the courts, we need opposing extreme conservatives. No middle ground.
What an absolute fucking cunt
He dissented last time, but agreed now in order to maintain precedent? What the fuck is this guys problem? The supreme court also set a precedent for racial segregation, should we go back to that? Total scumbag
He's probably been to at least one spirit cooking.
Every Friday night
Traitorous murderer, him and everyone else who advances the Left's mass killing of babies will burn in the depths of Hell
"For you know that no murderer has eternal life" - 1 John 3:15
I guess Epstein works very well.
I'm not familiar with the Texas case, can anyone educate me on "how" and "why" that case was ruled (which is what Roberts cites).
I remember reading Roberts' Obamacare ruling. Basically "it's not constitutional, but I'm going to allow it." When I read that, it became clear to me that Roberts sees his position as SCJ as a political/legislative one. In a best case scenario he's a self-righteous authoritarian, happily abusing his position to impart his vision of America on its citizens. In a worst case, he's totally compromised. I think both are equally bad, and he needs to go.
Roberts has opposed every conservative issue, every time.
Even Rush Limbaugh is asking, "What do they have on Justice Roberts?"
At this point what do conservatives even conserve? How do we control the Senate, The White House, and The Supreme Court and still lose every single case and appease BLM?
We don't want judges that rule according to our political goals. We want justices that interpret fairly what the current written laws say.
I wonder how many of these justices are essentially blackmailed by folks like Epstein.
George W. Bush is the guy to blame. He knew what he was getting.
Trump needs to appoint Clarence Thomas as Chief Judge...you know for black equality reasons...
Roberts needs to retire
Bush family dynasty
He bought his “adopted” children from a child trafficker.
Now they use that to extort decisions.