No clickbait, no bullshit, just me presenting the result of countless hours of painstakingly researching, connecting dots, and critical thinking/deductive reasoning. Here is the summary of my findings.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FOPAbcZ97CB1/
Methodology : (For those who research)
I read and watched as much as I could about the case and compiled a list of "claims" that have been made about the case, regardless of how believable or credible I initially found them to be.
I then painstakingly analyzed every claim and piece of evidence I had found and verified them (or debunked them). I listed the verifications and corroboration (or contradictions) for each claim.
Once I had completed the list I compiled a new list of every verifiable, undeniable fact that resulted, and I sat down and honestly examined their implications. I tried to find a reality where all of them could fit together and still be true, one in which not one fact had to be ignored or invalidated to make things fit. I found that there is only one such reality.
The only reality in which all the facts presented here can exist together in harmony is one in which Seth Rich leaked the DNC emails and was murdered for it. It is the one in which our federal intelligence and law enforcement apparatuses knowingly covered this fact up by inventing a Russian Collusion narrative that they later used in an attempt to oust Trump from office. (And to continue the cover up and avoid exposure).
This video is an overview of my conclusions. It uses a video of S. HERSCH describing what he knows as a basis because I found it to be the most accurate and complete account of the truth I could find. In this video I settled for presenting 1 verification per claim. I was often able to find 6 or 7 verifications for some of these claims, but if I went over each in the detail they deserved the video would be half a day long. I could literally write a book presenting it all and logically examining what it all tells us, but no one would read it. I am just a guy who loves his country and wants to expose the crimes of those who do not.
For now, I want other researchers to have access to this information so they can better target their research and possibly build upon my work. This is where it all began. Knowing that the entire Russian Collusion narrative started as a blatant lie to cover up a political murder really makes every subsequent actions the deep state took make perfect sense and is the context everything needs to be examined under.
It has been impossible to get anyone to take me seriously so far, but I won't stop trying. Hopefully this sub will help. I posted this late last night, like 1 or 2 in the morning, and it actually got a lot of positive feedback. I've tried to get the mods to watch the video and sticky this. I think I will reach more people posting mid day This is not about spamming or recognition for me, I just want to get this information out there. I want no credit or attribution, just help spreading the substance.
My question is why?
Like, say Seth Rich did leak some emails.. None of them were THAT terrible for the DNC. Plus, it isn't like they would be prosecuted anyway.
So why, if Seth did leak, what was so bad that he would be killed for? Like,in terms of political suicide having someone killed is way worse than anything in the DNC emails.
I believe there is something, but I just don't know what they thought he uncovered that was worth killing for? Espeically when Obama controlled the DOJ at that point and Hillary was expected to win.
Why? Those emails contributed to Clinton losing the election. They absolutely had the potential to. I believe they did. Pizzagate. Silsby. How they rigged the primary against Sanders. Their connection to mainstream media outlets. And a lot more.
They knew damn well what he had would be enough to sway the election. If that happened everything was at risk. Trump ran on draining the swamp at a time when corruption was rampant and unchecked. Obamagate. Flynn targeting. Epstein. None of this would be public knowledge had Hillary won. It really isn't hard to see "why," I thought that was the obvious part. A key point to consider is that they also didn't know exactly what all he had. With the shit they got up to they probably feared things getting out that we can only speculate about. These people were sick. It is easy to look back now and say "that wasn't worth murdering someone," but even though I disagree, they didn't know what all would be exposed. They couldn't make a judgement, they just knew he had a lot of damning internal files and was trying to sell them to wikileaks.
Political murder is not uncommon, at least not as uncommon as you seem to think. Let me give you another scenario.
A CIA agent goes flying out his hotel window and dies. The CIA called it suicide. When that was proven false they claimed he was given LSD and lost it. Finally Hershs source found out the truth, he was murdered by the CIA as an authorized operation. Why? He was planning to expose that the US used chemical weapons in Korea. Is that really that shocking? Anymore shocking than rigging a Democratic primary? Than all the other shit we learned? No. But that was enough for them to murder him for silence. Plus, if you can prove something with facts and logic, the why becomes interesting speculation, not critical to proving what happened.
Good question. Hope I addressed it well.
I really want to avoid going into the pedo stuff. It is not the focus of the post and people who have no idea how sick the deep state will use it to paint me as a whacko. Let's just say those emails were damning and probably lost the election for HC.
I never made that claim. Not once. I don't believe it to be true, so I wouldn't claim it. There is no proof in those emails. Let's avoid the pedo stuff. Suffice to say there was plenty other shit on those emails to be worried about.