520
Comments (12)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
QANON__17 [S] 12 points ago +13 / -1

As far as I understand it, Soros BTFO

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-177_b97c.pdf

As foreign organizations operating abroad, plaintiffs’ foreign affiliates possess no rights under the First Amendment.

In sum, plaintiffs’ foreign affiliates are foreign organiza-tions, and foreign organizations operating abroad possessno rights under the U. S. Constitution. We reverse the judgment of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Soros' org has no first amendment rights.

My guess is: Soros funds a lot of the resist movement so the D's propaganda arm just took a big hit, so perhaps they've retaliated by banning a lot of conservative accounts.

10
Marble68 10 points ago +10 / -0

Could this also mean - if these foreign orgs are being used to finance the demonstrators rioters terrorists they can't claim they're doing so under the 1st Amendment?

8
PROCIsAsshoe 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's what I was going to ask. I bet so. They're flipping over tables right now banning conservative voices voices. Literally letting their tendies hit the floor! Gotta be a bigger reason for them to be so upset.