He's right. You haven't noticed that this shit kicks off every four years, right before an election? The media would love nothing more than if right-wingers started opening fire on crowds of "peaceful," "anti-racist" protesters. I'm not saying people shouldn't defend themselves, but I think the driver in that white Excursion made the right choice in this particular case.
The left is sowing chaos, and if you respond with more chaos, you're playing right into their hand. That's what they want. In 2016 we had riots, cops being murdered in Dallas and Louisiana, Trump supporters violently attacked at rallies... and we weathered the storm. We showed them that their destruction and chaos only strengthened our resolve.
The left has had control of American culture for decades, and what you're seeing now is their desperate attempt to cling to that control. We know this has nothing to do with George Floyd. The issue of police killing unarmed black men is a made up problem; the number of instances last year was in the single digits (and it was higher during the Obama administration). The left "won" the culture war by convincing people with arguments and appealing to people's compassion... now that they see their control starting to wane, they're resorting to racial animus, violence, and chaos.
I know I may seem naive or crazy for saying this, but I'm actually optimistic. The reason things are getting so crazy is because we are so close to winning. There's old saying that goes something along the lines of: "a wounded tiger is more dangerous than a hungry one." Right now, the left is a wounded tiger, lashing out. All we have to do is keep our cool, and finish the job.
Have you not studied history? Like at all? Things don't get crazier because the other side is winning, it gets crazier because the liberals think they can get away with more drastic measures.
History shows that liberals escalate until they win. The first attack on Rome was a sniper inside a house. In the end it was 50 artillery shells bombing jospitals and churches.
The revolution of Mexico was disguised as a freedom movement and ended in genocide.
The left doesn't care if you fight back. They will kill you anyway if they can get away with it.
It's quickly heating up to that point anyway. Now that they are armed and firing at drivers, it gives us no choice but to be armed so that we can fire back. I'm certainly going to assume that any BLM crowd now has a few gunmen in it.
History shows that liberals escalate until they win. The first attack on Rome was a sniper inside a house. In the end it was 50 artillery shells bombing jospitals and churches.
What the hell are you even talking about? Is this a reference to WWII?
No that was when liberals led a revolution against the Pope. They started with civil unrests and protests then started a bloody war by shooting a Roman soldier. It ended when liberals surrounded Rome and bombed the city into submission. The population didn't want anything to do with the liberals so they saw civilians as legitimate targets.
Modern conservatives make the mistake of assuming the liberals will draw a line somewhere and say they won't cross it. But the liberals will not stop until they can bury conservatives.
You rest your case? I'm sure you're already aware of this, but Rome has a few millennia worth of history. Just because I don't what specific event you're being extremely vague about, doesn't mean I don't know history. It would be helpful if you mentioned a name or date... or at least narrowed it down to a particular century.
He's right. You haven't noticed that this shit kicks off every four years, right before an election? The media would love nothing more than if right-wingers started opening fire on crowds of "peaceful," "anti-racist" protesters. I'm not saying people shouldn't defend themselves, but I think the driver in that white Excursion made the right choice in this particular case.
The left is sowing chaos, and if you respond with more chaos, you're playing right into their hand. That's what they want. In 2016 we had riots, cops being murdered in Dallas and Louisiana, Trump supporters violently attacked at rallies... and we weathered the storm. We showed them that their destruction and chaos only strengthened our resolve.
The left has had control of American culture for decades, and what you're seeing now is their desperate attempt to cling to that control. We know this has nothing to do with George Floyd. The issue of police killing unarmed black men is a made up problem; the number of instances last year was in the single digits (and it was higher during the Obama administration). The left "won" the culture war by convincing people with arguments and appealing to people's compassion... now that they see their control starting to wane, they're resorting to racial animus, violence, and chaos.
I know I may seem naive or crazy for saying this, but I'm actually optimistic. The reason things are getting so crazy is because we are so close to winning. There's old saying that goes something along the lines of: "a wounded tiger is more dangerous than a hungry one." Right now, the left is a wounded tiger, lashing out. All we have to do is keep our cool, and finish the job.
Have you not studied history? Like at all? Things don't get crazier because the other side is winning, it gets crazier because the liberals think they can get away with more drastic measures.
History shows that liberals escalate until they win. The first attack on Rome was a sniper inside a house. In the end it was 50 artillery shells bombing jospitals and churches.
The revolution of Mexico was disguised as a freedom movement and ended in genocide.
The left doesn't care if you fight back. They will kill you anyway if they can get away with it.
It's quickly heating up to that point anyway. Now that they are armed and firing at drivers, it gives us no choice but to be armed so that we can fire back. I'm certainly going to assume that any BLM crowd now has a few gunmen in it.
What the hell are you even talking about? Is this a reference to WWII?
I rest my case...
No that was when liberals led a revolution against the Pope. They started with civil unrests and protests then started a bloody war by shooting a Roman soldier. It ended when liberals surrounded Rome and bombed the city into submission. The population didn't want anything to do with the liberals so they saw civilians as legitimate targets.
Modern conservatives make the mistake of assuming the liberals will draw a line somewhere and say they won't cross it. But the liberals will not stop until they can bury conservatives.
History will tell you this.
You rest your case? I'm sure you're already aware of this, but Rome has a few millennia worth of history. Just because I don't what specific event you're being extremely vague about, doesn't mean I don't know history. It would be helpful if you mentioned a name or date... or at least narrowed it down to a particular century.
Yeah wtf?