Let's follow this logic. So he sends in the national guard. The lefties escalate to the point where you may see bricks, bombs, or live ammo coming from the crowds. The national guard is forced to respond in kind. Some young retards die. The media then frames it as Trump sending in the national guard to kill young kids, he loses the election, and everything goes according to their plan.
The whole purpose of these riots is to make Trump lose the election. Don't play right into it.
that might have been true at the outset although i personally doubt it
we've spent a month watching innocent people get wounded or killed by these rioting mongs while lives have been destroyed and businesses utterly demolished
if you're still hung up on "oh my god the media might actually air negative ads against the president that's never happened before" after a month of this how many more people need to get their lives ruined first?
you cant run as the law and order candidate if you were actively president while this bullshit was going on. what do you think is worse? CNN running negative ads against the president for the 8 millionth time, or establishing precedent that you can force the government to come to a screeching halt for anything up to and including putting down deadly riots in an election year for fear they'd do something that could cost them an election? is it better to have a legacy of doing the right thing and being shamed for it or standing by doing nothing while you had the power to protect people? why don't you ask the deputy at parkland who stood outside the building doing nothing but listening to the screams while the shooting was going on?
The media have been negative the whole time, sure, and so far they've failed to pierce the armor.
we've spent a month watching innocent people get wounded or killed by these rioting mongs while lives have been destroyed and businesses utterly demolished
And no one blames Trump for that because BLM is doing it. If it's the national guard that changes.
is it better to have a legacy of doing the right thing and being shamed for it or standing by doing nothing while you had the power to protect people? why don't you ask the deputy at parkland who stood outside the building doing nothing but listening to the screams while the shooting was going on?
They've been trying to say Trump is a tyrant since the beginning. No one believes them. The governors are against him. If he sends in the military without their permission, then suddenly the media has a story to run with that looks true. Trust in Trump. He knows what he's doing. If it got bad enough he would go in no problem, but right now things are not at that point and sending in the military or national guard is overkill.
He just needs to continue sending the feds in to pick off Antifa one by one. They are the ones riling up the crowds. As far as the looters go in general, that's something the police need to take care of. Even NYPD doesn't want Trump to send in the calvary at the moment, because they can handle it on their own as long as the local government actually prosecutes people.
Let's follow this logic. So he sends in the national guard. The lefties escalate to the point where you may see bricks, bombs, or live ammo coming from the crowds. The national guard is forced to respond in kind. Some young retards die. The media then frames it as Trump sending in the national guard to kill young kids, he loses the election, and everything goes according to their plan.
The whole purpose of these riots is to make Trump lose the election. Don't play right into it.
that might have been true at the outset although i personally doubt it
we've spent a month watching innocent people get wounded or killed by these rioting mongs while lives have been destroyed and businesses utterly demolished
if you're still hung up on "oh my god the media might actually air negative ads against the president that's never happened before" after a month of this how many more people need to get their lives ruined first?
you cant run as the law and order candidate if you were actively president while this bullshit was going on. what do you think is worse? CNN running negative ads against the president for the 8 millionth time, or establishing precedent that you can force the government to come to a screeching halt for anything up to and including putting down deadly riots in an election year for fear they'd do something that could cost them an election? is it better to have a legacy of doing the right thing and being shamed for it or standing by doing nothing while you had the power to protect people? why don't you ask the deputy at parkland who stood outside the building doing nothing but listening to the screams while the shooting was going on?
The media have been negative the whole time, sure, and so far they've failed to pierce the armor.
And no one blames Trump for that because BLM is doing it. If it's the national guard that changes.
They've been trying to say Trump is a tyrant since the beginning. No one believes them. The governors are against him. If he sends in the military without their permission, then suddenly the media has a story to run with that looks true. Trust in Trump. He knows what he's doing. If it got bad enough he would go in no problem, but right now things are not at that point and sending in the military or national guard is overkill.
He just needs to continue sending the feds in to pick off Antifa one by one. They are the ones riling up the crowds. As far as the looters go in general, that's something the police need to take care of. Even NYPD doesn't want Trump to send in the calvary at the moment, because they can handle it on their own as long as the local government actually prosecutes people.