History shows that liberals escalate until they win. The first attack on Rome was a sniper inside a house. In the end it was 50 artillery shells bombing jospitals and churches.
What the hell are you even talking about? Is this a reference to WWII?
No that was when liberals led a revolution against the Pope. They started with civil unrests and protests then started a bloody war by shooting a Roman soldier. It ended when liberals surrounded Rome and bombed the city into submission. The population didn't want anything to do with the liberals so they saw civilians as legitimate targets.
Modern conservatives make the mistake of assuming the liberals will draw a line somewhere and say they won't cross it. But the liberals will not stop until they can bury conservatives.
You rest your case? I'm sure you're already aware of this, but Rome has a few millennia worth of history. Just because I don't what specific event you're being extremely vague about, doesn't mean I don't know history. It would be helpful if you mentioned a name or date... or at least narrowed it down to a particular century.
It during the revolution led by Garibaldi from 1860 to 1870. The child murderer and executionor of unarmed civilians is a hero by the vile Italians.
Of course anything that isn't Italian was erased from mainstream history. You'll have to resort to reading books like Pope's Legion and finding old folk songs because the liberals erased anything they didn't like. Just like they're doing now in America.
That doesn't seem analogous to our current situation at all. In the mid 19th century, Italy wasn't a single country. The people were fighting for unification, democracy, and against foreign rule (namely, the Austrian Empire). I don't doubt there were despicable acts committed by horrible people—just like with the French revolution at the end of the 18th century—but that doesn't mean the Italians weren't justified in fighting a foreign government occupying their country.
What the hell are you even talking about? Is this a reference to WWII?
I rest my case...
No that was when liberals led a revolution against the Pope. They started with civil unrests and protests then started a bloody war by shooting a Roman soldier. It ended when liberals surrounded Rome and bombed the city into submission. The population didn't want anything to do with the liberals so they saw civilians as legitimate targets.
Modern conservatives make the mistake of assuming the liberals will draw a line somewhere and say they won't cross it. But the liberals will not stop until they can bury conservatives.
History will tell you this.
You rest your case? I'm sure you're already aware of this, but Rome has a few millennia worth of history. Just because I don't what specific event you're being extremely vague about, doesn't mean I don't know history. It would be helpful if you mentioned a name or date... or at least narrowed it down to a particular century.
It during the revolution led by Garibaldi from 1860 to 1870. The child murderer and executionor of unarmed civilians is a hero by the vile Italians.
Of course anything that isn't Italian was erased from mainstream history. You'll have to resort to reading books like Pope's Legion and finding old folk songs because the liberals erased anything they didn't like. Just like they're doing now in America.
That doesn't seem analogous to our current situation at all. In the mid 19th century, Italy wasn't a single country. The people were fighting for unification, democracy, and against foreign rule (namely, the Austrian Empire). I don't doubt there were despicable acts committed by horrible people—just like with the French revolution at the end of the 18th century—but that doesn't mean the Italians weren't justified in fighting a foreign government occupying their country.
Yeah wtf?