4309
Comments (920)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
A_Flappy_Civic 5 points ago +6 / -1

I rest my case...

No that was when liberals led a revolution against the Pope. They started with civil unrests and protests then started a bloody war by shooting a Roman soldier. It ended when liberals surrounded Rome and bombed the city into submission. The population didn't want anything to do with the liberals so they saw civilians as legitimate targets.

Modern conservatives make the mistake of assuming the liberals will draw a line somewhere and say they won't cross it. But the liberals will not stop until they can bury conservatives.

History will tell you this.

5
BernsWhenIPee 5 points ago +5 / -0

I rest my case...

You rest your case? I'm sure you're already aware of this, but Rome has a few millennia worth of history. Just because I don't what specific event you're being extremely vague about, doesn't mean I don't know history. It would be helpful if you mentioned a name or date... or at least narrowed it down to a particular century.

2
A_Flappy_Civic 2 points ago +2 / -0

It during the revolution led by Garibaldi from 1860 to 1870. The child murderer and executionor of unarmed civilians is a hero by the vile Italians.

Of course anything that isn't Italian was erased from mainstream history. You'll have to resort to reading books like Pope's Legion and finding old folk songs because the liberals erased anything they didn't like. Just like they're doing now in America.

1
BernsWhenIPee 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't seem analogous to our current situation at all. In the mid 19th century, Italy wasn't a single country. The people were fighting for unification, democracy, and against foreign rule (namely, the Austrian Empire). I don't doubt there were despicable acts committed by horrible people—just like with the French revolution at the end of the 18th century—but that doesn't mean the Italians weren't justified in fighting a foreign government occupying their country.

1
A_Flappy_Civic 1 point ago +1 / -0

The people were fighting for unification

I'm sorry what? The "people" were most definitely not fighting for unification. Literal foreigners caused riots and supplied a mob with weapons that proceeded to kill civilians and police alike. Then Savoy, a foreign nation that supported the mob, would claim it needed to protect civilians by sending in troops. Then people were executed for refusing to denounce their religion and leader.

democracy

There was no democracy. Savoy was a monarchy...

against foreign rule (namely, the Austrian Empire).

The Austrian Empire supported the revolution and gave Garibaldi ships. Only nation that helped the Christians was Belgium. France mainly pretended to help but withdrew support when the actual battles began.

that doesn't mean the Italians weren't justified in fighting a foreign government occupying their country.

There is so much wrong with this statement that I don't really know where to begin. Even if you're pro-Italian, it just doesn't make sense.

Guess it is a testimony to how well the liberals can distort history and hide their old tactics so it can be reused again.

Honestly I don't think America will even have a fight. Most people are either lazy and expect Trump to do everything or too delusional to realize Democrats are in the wrong. The states are turning into totalitarian governments and no one really cares. Eventually you will not be able to buy or sell unless you obey the state. Just ask Andrew Torba and take a look at the mandatory masks and quarantine laws. They've effectively removed due process while blacklisting the handful that will actually do something about the corruption.

At this point I just laugh when someone unironically says Garibaldi was good while also despising what is happening in America.