No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has ownership. And they are supposed to have a signed release from Trump, but maybe not since he is a public figure.
But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.
Nah the truth is far more sinister. Citizens will do this of their own accord because they think it rewards them with some type of salvation. It's a religion. An evil one.
It's not a "man on the street" photo. Trump obviously would have scheduled a shoot with that photographer and that would include giving him the right to use the photograph. I can't imagine that not being in any contract before he would allow it.
Or he could have been hired by the producers of the television show and they're the ones that retained the rights to all the photography. It makes more sense to me that the shit birds from NBC would file a copyright claim rather than the photographer.
Surely Trump retains the right to publish his own photo no matter who the photographer is
No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has ownership. And they are supposed to have a signed release from Trump, but maybe not since he is a public figure.
But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.
Trump should have Barron reshoot the photo using an iPhone and just use that one. Lol
This would be an amazing troll move lol
Nah the truth is far more sinister. Citizens will do this of their own accord because they think it rewards them with some type of salvation. It's a religion. An evil one.
he works for the new york times.
https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1025496570563837952?lang=en
you don't get to work at new york times without having TDS.
It's not a "man on the street" photo. Trump obviously would have scheduled a shoot with that photographer and that would include giving him the right to use the photograph. I can't imagine that not being in any contract before he would allow it.
We don't know what was in the contract.
POTUS is pretty good with contracts... just seems unlikely he would sign away the right to distribute
Or he could have been hired by the producers of the television show and they're the ones that retained the rights to all the photography. It makes more sense to me that the shit birds from NBC would file a copyright claim rather than the photographer.