This guy called it back in 2014,
Quarantine and lockdowns are a tool to implement complete control of the populace.The pandemic brings the economy to a halt. Crashes the tourism sector, travel restrictions keep you at home, they want you locked down, isolated, inside your house in front of your TV. Once you watch their tv, they own you.
It isn't the TV anymore. It's feeds. Once you start looking into how feeds work things will change for you. People's opinion are defined by their feeds. That is why some people you know have been radically shifting their opinions in somewhat contradictory and apparently random manners.
It is as if there is a "tell them what to believe" button where you feed in content and output human's beliefs.
It is the public lack of awareness that led Alexandria Cortez to feel secure enough to collaborate with China via TikTok.
If you tweak the system it will send you what is approved that it thinks you are looking for. Got to keep you engaged as your nudge to the left progresses. Also generally platforms are designed to send users the content users want. They're supposed to be.
I'm not really using hyperbole however if you want to look at it that way for just one minute then backtrack it's a really good exercise. The system is nuanced and always iterating. It's not perfect and it is a human product, so it will have our flaws.
Want to see the extreme example? Go look at the shithole that drudge has become. Deeply look at the structure of their linking, networks, and authorship + messaging/narrative. Then imagine breaking that apart and syndicating it through feeds.
It's the Cathedral. True power lies in think tanks and universities. Chomsky only comes out to boast about what he is actively doing, like manufacture consent. Kissinger quietly runs foreign policy through CFR.
I earnestly disagree with Chomsky politically and I don't really think that dude has enough reach to manufacture more than outlier opinions with fringe orgs that are corrupted as soon as they get any power anyways. Syndicalism doesn't work when your people can just get bought off.
CFR/Trilat is scary af.
I interviewed someone from Harvard for a sales role. They were retarded. I was shocked. This was over ten years ago. I'm still shocked and can only imagine how bad it's gotten since.
Indeed. Further I posit that the stories that quickly appear in the lamestream aren't organic. They are things already queued, like ammo in a magazine, to be dispensed, as much as it takes, to bury something good in the news cycle our Don is doing or saying.
Im confident if we look back at the last 20 ridiculous things the dems 'announced' or did publicity stunt/statement wise that were particularly odd or comical (the Wakanda Forever african cloth kneeling pantomime eg) theres a good thing that Trumps admin did, said or some kind of plesant policy results happened just before.
Exactly. They are running focus testing along with a content calendar. For BLM I suspect they had everything lined up neatly. Statistically it is inevitable that there will be a shooting. They set criteria for what that needed to look like (minimum viability) and as soon as there was a tragedy they could use they executed a prebuilt plan.
Maybe because of something called the deep state? POTUS does not always pick his own staff independently. The RINOS in the GOP give him a list of candidates that they fill to the brim with other RINOS
The CDC makes recommendations, its the state Governors making it mandatory/trying to be law that are wrecking the economy. And they are 100% doing it to hurt Trumps chances of a 2020 win.
Not sure why you were downvoted. But by asking that, it looks as though you're making an assumption that these guys are being straight legit. They have been all over the place on decisions and that gives the appearance that they've been politically compromised. Their stance on HCQ is the best example. Then never even had to take a position on a drug that's been in safe use for decades. But after Trump talked about it, they had to put their own spin on it.
HCQ has been denied to sick people. And by itself is NOT the way to use it. It's antiviral specifically to this virus in vtro when combined with azithromycin. Add zinc to it and hospitalizations and deaths are further cut in half.
How do you reduce hospitalizations when you prohibit it for outpatient use? 40+ Governors have done so.
The VA study administered toxic doses, and only gave HCQ to people who were FAR sicker to begin with. That's not science, that's malfeasance, proganda, and malpractice.
The Brazil study administered lethal doses, then stopped when people died. Before that, they had repeated the 95% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. After they stopped using it, deaths skyrocketed.
Our Governors have mass murdered well over 110,000, yet you see it as "no big deal." King George never engaged in this level of tyranny, denying medicine to sick people. I guess it was a mistake to rebel against him, too.
One Governor (in SD) made sure that nobody interfered with Drs treating their patients, or pharmacists filling prescriptions. She reduced deaths per confirmed positive case by 12 x as compared to the National average, back when this was lethal. This proves that one Governor does have the power to beat this bureaucracy 37 + Governors hide behind and blame.
Now once a person is so sick they can be admitted to the hospital for CCPvirus? Not the best way to practice medicine. Regardless what type of infection or disease you're dealing with, regardless what the treatment is, you want to do it EARLY. Wait 5 days for a test result? FUCK NO. Dr's diagnosis is far more accurate anyway, once they know what they're dealing with. If they aren't sure then the patient may have time to play with because the disease hasn't progressed so much.
I remember the first DJT government shutdown. Something like one more day and he could have fired anyone / everyone at will.
He also said he would never sign anything like that budget that re-opened the government again.
Yet here we are, 10,000 x worse.
You could say that at the time I was saying burn it all to the ground - but that was a metaphor. I still believe that was the right thing to do, and the downside would have done far less damage to the Country than the literal version of burning things to the ground that we've seen for over a month now.
Which one hurts the economy most? It will be that one.
This guy called it back in 2014, Quarantine and lockdowns are a tool to implement complete control of the populace. The pandemic brings the economy to a halt. Crashes the tourism sector, travel restrictions keep you at home, they want you locked down, isolated, inside your house in front of your TV. Once you watch their tv, they own you.
It’s a good watch
https://thedonald.win/p/GIEibufA/holy-shit-this-investigative-jou/
shout out to u/Slick_Willys_Nutsack
It isn't the TV anymore. It's feeds. Once you start looking into how feeds work things will change for you. People's opinion are defined by their feeds. That is why some people you know have been radically shifting their opinions in somewhat contradictory and apparently random manners.
It is as if there is a "tell them what to believe" button where you feed in content and output human's beliefs.
It is the public lack of awareness that led Alexandria Cortez to feel secure enough to collaborate with China via TikTok.
My "feed" is RIGHT FUCKING HERE!!
Not tired of .winning yet
I make every effort to have my feeds be full of content I disagree with. I didn't realize til now that it might be that way by default.
If you tweak the system it will send you what is approved that it thinks you are looking for. Got to keep you engaged as your nudge to the left progresses. Also generally platforms are designed to send users the content users want. They're supposed to be.
I'm not really using hyperbole however if you want to look at it that way for just one minute then backtrack it's a really good exercise. The system is nuanced and always iterating. It's not perfect and it is a human product, so it will have our flaws.
Want to see the extreme example? Go look at the shithole that drudge has become. Deeply look at the structure of their linking, networks, and authorship + messaging/narrative. Then imagine breaking that apart and syndicating it through feeds.
A MOOD. 👍💯🇺🇲
It's the Cathedral. True power lies in think tanks and universities. Chomsky only comes out to boast about what he is actively doing, like manufacture consent. Kissinger quietly runs foreign policy through CFR.
The cops should be clearing out Harvard.
I earnestly disagree with Chomsky politically and I don't really think that dude has enough reach to manufacture more than outlier opinions with fringe orgs that are corrupted as soon as they get any power anyways. Syndicalism doesn't work when your people can just get bought off.
CFR/Trilat is scary af.
I interviewed someone from Harvard for a sales role. They were retarded. I was shocked. This was over ten years ago. I'm still shocked and can only imagine how bad it's gotten since.
Indeed. Further I posit that the stories that quickly appear in the lamestream aren't organic. They are things already queued, like ammo in a magazine, to be dispensed, as much as it takes, to bury something good in the news cycle our Don is doing or saying.
Im confident if we look back at the last 20 ridiculous things the dems 'announced' or did publicity stunt/statement wise that were particularly odd or comical (the Wakanda Forever african cloth kneeling pantomime eg) theres a good thing that Trumps admin did, said or some kind of plesant policy results happened just before.
Exactly. They are running focus testing along with a content calendar. For BLM I suspect they had everything lined up neatly. Statistically it is inevitable that there will be a shooting. They set criteria for what that needed to look like (minimum viability) and as soon as there was a tragedy they could use they executed a prebuilt plan.
They didn't predict the Dot Win Effect.
WOW! That should of had a sticky! Everyone should see this video. Thanks for posting!!!
That's the thing...all of them do.
You're looking at a wheel of chaos.
If they even just picked two of those, stuck with them, and the media reported less cases...it would be more believable than this.
tucker carlson PRECISELY explains what you need to do to get the gop to work for youu
this is 100% worth watching all the wayy
https://youtu.be/6ec5lAFbeFg
Confusion. If they change their answer every couple weeks then no one knows what to think anymore.
I know exactly what to think. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Oceania has always been at war with East Asia.
(Sorry, I don't do the NPC bit very well)
Maybe because of something called the deep state? POTUS does not always pick his own staff independently. The RINOS in the GOP give him a list of candidates that they fill to the brim with other RINOS
Pick me pick me.
Well he needs to do better. And disband the CIA entirely. Department of Education too, we all know that's why Betsy Devos was picked.
The CDC makes recommendations, its the state Governors making it mandatory/trying to be law that are wrecking the economy. And they are 100% doing it to hurt Trumps chances of a 2020 win.
They're going for a LOT more than just the continued coup attempt, but that's enough to make them marked men
They didn’t run the response at all. They’ve just been busy being stupid and ineffectual over in the corner.
Not sure why you were downvoted. But by asking that, it looks as though you're making an assumption that these guys are being straight legit. They have been all over the place on decisions and that gives the appearance that they've been politically compromised. Their stance on HCQ is the best example. Then never even had to take a position on a drug that's been in safe use for decades. But after Trump talked about it, they had to put their own spin on it.
ALL bullshit!
HCQ has been denied to sick people. And by itself is NOT the way to use it. It's antiviral specifically to this virus in vtro when combined with azithromycin. Add zinc to it and hospitalizations and deaths are further cut in half.
How do you reduce hospitalizations when you prohibit it for outpatient use? 40+ Governors have done so.
The VA study administered toxic doses, and only gave HCQ to people who were FAR sicker to begin with. That's not science, that's malfeasance, proganda, and malpractice.
The Brazil study administered lethal doses, then stopped when people died. Before that, they had repeated the 95% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths. After they stopped using it, deaths skyrocketed.
Our Governors have mass murdered well over 110,000, yet you see it as "no big deal." King George never engaged in this level of tyranny, denying medicine to sick people. I guess it was a mistake to rebel against him, too.
One Governor (in SD) made sure that nobody interfered with Drs treating their patients, or pharmacists filling prescriptions. She reduced deaths per confirmed positive case by 12 x as compared to the National average, back when this was lethal. This proves that one Governor does have the power to beat this bureaucracy 37 + Governors hide behind and blame.
Now once a person is so sick they can be admitted to the hospital for CCPvirus? Not the best way to practice medicine. Regardless what type of infection or disease you're dealing with, regardless what the treatment is, you want to do it EARLY. Wait 5 days for a test result? FUCK NO. Dr's diagnosis is far more accurate anyway, once they know what they're dealing with. If they aren't sure then the patient may have time to play with because the disease hasn't progressed so much.
Appointing a director doesn't transform a big government bureaucracy filled with unfire-able Federal union statists.
(Sincerely, not sarcastic. This is the explanation.)
I remember the first DJT government shutdown. Something like one more day and he could have fired anyone / everyone at will.
He also said he would never sign anything like that budget that re-opened the government again.
Yet here we are, 10,000 x worse.
You could say that at the time I was saying burn it all to the ground - but that was a metaphor. I still believe that was the right thing to do, and the downside would have done far less damage to the Country than the literal version of burning things to the ground that we've seen for over a month now.
who recommended them to trump ?