Yep. Actual cases is probably in the millions, meaning the death rate is infinitesimally small. Media likes to parade around case numbers, which is wholly dependent upon the number of tests (which we now lead in), but fail to actually look at the figures that matter: deaths and hospitalizations... except when convenient of course like in Houston, one of the only incidents of overflow being utilized in the entire country. Everybody knows that Houston, Dallas, and Minneapolis had their cases spike because of the mobs and not because of reopening (the timeline and victim ages exactly reinforce this idea), yet nobody wants to say it or else you're racist. So spineless, so pathetic.
Your math is poor. 1 person out of 100k die.
100/100k = .1% (1/1000) not .001%
It's okay tho, we love our educated as much as our poorly educated :p
Yep. Actual cases is probably in the millions, meaning the death rate is infinitesimally small. Media likes to parade around case numbers, which is wholly dependent upon the number of tests (which we now lead in), but fail to actually look at the figures that matter: deaths and hospitalizations... except when convenient of course like in Houston, one of the only incidents of overflow being utilized in the entire country. Everybody knows that Houston, Dallas, and Minneapolis had their cases spike because of the mobs and not because of reopening (the timeline and victim ages exactly reinforce this idea), yet nobody wants to say it or else you're racist. So spineless, so pathetic.
0.001 * 100,000 = 100
I agree I could be mistaken. All the mortality rates use different ratios I feel like.
.001 is .1%. 1 is 100%.