You'll face downvotes as will I. I appreciate Tucker's rhetoric but when has he really had to put that rhetoric into action? His fortune, name, and honor aren't under assault daily. President Trump is imperfect but he is advancing an agenda that was moribund until he arrived.
I remember Tucker screeching for Trump to indulge the Scamdemic, then screeching to stop it. I remember him pitching a tent for Tulsi Gabbard. It's easy to be a pundit. It's much more difficult to be a President who is attempting to reverse decades of corruption.
I can appreciate what Tucker says but I won't forget that only one man stepped in the Lion's Den to make a real difference.
How so? Is there a constant barrage to dehumanize him? His advertisers left his show but still pay to advertise on the network that pays his salary. Tucker lost to Jon Stewart, unfairly I believe, but still lost. Tucker is a backseat driver. Useful and insightful at times but still not a driver.
No. They chanted outside his house. Did he mow them down like he's encouraging President Trump to do? Why didn't Tucker bring down the hammer? Like every other person he expects someone else to do the heavy lifting while he yaps on the sidelines. Weak? Seems like it. Those "boomers" in St Louis had more balls than Tulsi Carlson. Right?
How does it further your point that a known globalist corporation like Fox can continue to pay Tucker? Wouldn't that paint Tucker as a sellout? He will make a buck from the people he rails against so "passionately". If he was threat they'd cut him off.
You'll face downvotes as will I. I appreciate Tucker's rhetoric but when has he really had to put that rhetoric into action? His fortune, name, and honor aren't under assault daily. President Trump is imperfect but he is advancing an agenda that was moribund until he arrived.
I remember Tucker screeching for Trump to indulge the Scamdemic, then screeching to stop it. I remember him pitching a tent for Tulsi Gabbard. It's easy to be a pundit. It's much more difficult to be a President who is attempting to reverse decades of corruption.
I can appreciate what Tucker says but I won't forget that only one man stepped in the Lion's Den to make a real difference.
Yes it is.
The angry mob has literally shown up in his house and threatened his wife. Not in these George Floyd era mobs but not too long before
How so? Is there a constant barrage to dehumanize him? His advertisers left his show but still pay to advertise on the network that pays his salary. Tucker lost to Jon Stewart, unfairly I believe, but still lost. Tucker is a backseat driver. Useful and insightful at times but still not a driver.
They tried to set fire to his house at night with his wife alone with the dogs.
Fuck you if you think that’s acceptable.
No. They chanted outside his house. Did he mow them down like he's encouraging President Trump to do? Why didn't Tucker bring down the hammer? Like every other person he expects someone else to do the heavy lifting while he yaps on the sidelines. Weak? Seems like it. Those "boomers" in St Louis had more balls than Tulsi Carlson. Right?
what do you mean he lost to jon stewart? are you talking about that time where jon stewart was forced to use the "hurr durr im a comedian" defense?
jon stewart came off as a pathetic loser in that exchange
Yep but that's OK. This is what Tucker does - says enough right things to get people on his side as he stealthily shoves the knife in PDJT's back.
Tucker stabs the America First agenda from the right while taking a check from Globalist Fox. He's the bees knees.
Tucker IS the America First agenda.
Then let Tucker after so many decades on the sidelines throw his hat in the ring.
Original ideas from Tulsi? Name them please. UBI is older than Yang, and I believe Finland tried and scrapped it.
https://news.sky.com/story/finland-to-scrap-universal-basic-income-scheme-after-two-year-trial-11344735
Lmao if anything he stands to lost more than the president. Which one of them is a billionaire?
Which one of them has lost fortune in the political arena and which one still profits?
you are furthering my point. Tucker is still profiting, he stands to lose more...
How does it further your point that a known globalist corporation like Fox can continue to pay Tucker? Wouldn't that paint Tucker as a sellout? He will make a buck from the people he rails against so "passionately". If he was threat they'd cut him off.