The fact that they're so wilfully dishonest in their discourse is what ultimately proves that what they pretend to stand for is not what they stand for at all. It's one of the most frustrating things when dealing with fence sitters. They keep harping on about "muh two-sides", but refuse to acknowledge that the one side is fundamentally dishonest, which makes the two sides completely unequal. One side IS better than the other side. If the two sides were equal neither would try to silence the other.
The fact that they're so wilfully dishonest in their discourse is what ultimately proves that what they pretend to stand for is not what they stand for at all. It's one of the most frustrating things when dealing with fence sitters. They keep harping on about "muh two-sides", but refuse to acknowledge that the one side is fundamentally dishonest, which makes the two sides completely unequal. One side IS better than the other side. If the two sides were equal neither would try to silence the other.