3732
Comments (149)
sorted by:
159
Threaper666 159 points ago +159 / -0

What the fact that she ruined more black lives than the KKK did?

66
deleted 66 points ago +67 / -1
28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
22
agile_a 22 points ago +22 / -0

use infogalactic. never link to Wikipedia

https://infogalactic.com/info/Kamala_Harris

5
RadMaxBTD 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks for the share pede :-)

This is my first look at IG. Great concept and way better than chazipedia

7
agile_a 7 points ago +7 / -0

it's an uncensored version of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is founder called Trump a cult leader. Wikipedia also made rules that only allow far left-wing propaganda sites and reputable independent and right-wing sites band as sources..

infogalactic allows all sources. so it has much more information and it doesn't censor things that hurt the Democrat Party

just compare the Washington Post articles or The Rachel maddow articles between the two

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow

https://infogalactic.com/info/Rachel_Maddow

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Cernovich

https://infogalactic.com/info/Mike_Cernovich

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Post

https://infogalactic.com/info/The_Washington_Post

1
TheClassicalLiberal 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are their mods better? What makes it a superior site?

Or is it that the left hasn't started brigading it yet?

5
agile_a 5 points ago +5 / -0

it's an uncensored version of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is founder called Trump a cult leader. Wikipedia also made rules that only allow far left-wing propaganda sites and reputable independent and right-wing sites band as sources..

infogalactic allows all sources. so it has much more information and it doesn't censor things that hurt the Democrat Party

just compare the Washington Post articles or The Rachel maddow articles between the two

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow

https://infogalactic.com/info/Rachel_Maddow

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Cernovich

https://infogalactic.com/info/Mike_Cernovich

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Post

https://infogalactic.com/info/The_Washington_Post

1
4
agile_a 4 points ago +4 / -0

that website is often better except that with a name like conservapedia moderates and liberals won't trust it

0
Fagget 0 points ago +1 / -1

Isn’t this a Vox Day website?

I’ve all seen everipedia mentioned too though I have no idea if it is worth a shit or not.

https://everipedia.org/

3
agile_a 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's an uncensored version of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is founder called Trump a cult leader. Wikipedia also made rules that only allow far left-wing propaganda sites and reputable independent and right-wing sites band as sources..

infogalactic allows all sources. so it has much more information and it doesn't censor things that hurt the Democrat Party

just compare the Washington Post articles or The Rachel maddow articles between the two

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow

https://infogalactic.com/info/Rachel_Maddow

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Cernovich

https://infogalactic.com/info/Mike_Cernovich

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Post

https://infogalactic.com/info/The_Washington_Post

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
SixteenBeatsAOne 0 points ago +1 / -1

In Infogalactic (section 7), Political Position could simply be listed as "Heels Up". Giggiddy.

3
thuggishruggishtrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

She does look like she can suck a mean..

Nevermind lol

2
vote_for_MAGA_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Talk about win win!

24
Hckyhillbilly 24 points ago +24 / -0

She did get her start in politics on his staff.

5
Ogbob44 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, in his lap

8
malthrax 8 points ago +8 / -0

Exactly... on his "staff".

1
Ogbob44 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got the reference, he still has dirt on her, in essence, in his lap. Like the fucking dog she is.

1
malthrax 1 point ago +1 / -0

ahhhhh... hahahahahahah!

2
Jabblemonkey1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek

3
IFIFIF 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now she will be HEELS DOWN HARRIS

8
residue69 8 points ago +8 / -0

After she got what she wanted, she threaten to end him if he was caught for so much as jaywalking.

5
WinstonSmith1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, she didn't exactly save his marriage, either.

5
Butt_expert 5 points ago +5 / -0

His wikipedia is fuckin' hilarious. They are clearly sanitizing kamala's as hard as they can but willie's is a nightmare for her

4
Centaurboots 4 points ago +4 / -0

PENIS JJES!

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
8
BestShitholeCountry2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ah, doublethink.

How an anti-racism movement can simultaneously be anti-white.

If it wasn't so terrifying it'd almost be beautiful.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
BestShitholeCountry2 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's like God creating art. A weird 4D art that can attack you albeit, but still impressive and pretty interesting to observe

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Spirit_of_Resistance 0 points ago +2 / -2

But not (((whites))) at the same time

0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +1 / -1

((((((whites))))))

8
DisgustedByMisleadia 8 points ago +8 / -0

Since the left is tearing down statues of just about anyone who lived prior to the Civil War, they should be looking at Kamala's relatives.

Her great grandmother (on her father's side) was a plantation owner in Jamaica, and was notably abusive of her slaves.

Unlike nearly every Caucasian in the US, Kamala is descended from an actual slave owner.

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

She ruined black lives HOW ? Wasn't she a prosecutor ? Didn't she convict criminals who happened to be black ? If they committed crimes, didn't they ruin their OWN lives ?

If people want to criticize Kamala Harris for being an opportunistic whore who slept her way up the ladder of politics or for being a phony woke race-baiter - that's fine - but I don't think conservatives should be slamming prosecutors for going after criminals.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
slaphappy2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I get that. That's why the mayor of Seattle finally broke down CHOP. A pair of black teens beat and carjacked somebody at knifepoint - and got shot by somebody in a car with"Security" painted on it.

Can't have a society where black criminals are too scared to do their culture.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wut? As far as could be seen, they owned the car.

110
Media_Brews_Hate 110 points ago +110 / -0

A fitting running mate for Biden, she's got the black vote "all locked up".

16
TrumpaSorosFlex 16 points ago +16 / -0

Kek

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
61
Loc12 61 points ago +61 / -0

Harris slammed Hallinan for failing to prosecute anti-war protesters for property destruction. “It is not progressive to be soft on crime,” she said.

LOL the fucking irony. Are there any bigger hypocrites than the left

25
WinstonSmith1984 25 points ago +25 / -0

"Are there any bigger hypocrites than the left?"

No

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
Spirit_of_Resistance 1 point ago +2 / -1

They're still hypocrites but that's the nicest thing you can call them

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
44
TDSisReal 44 points ago +44 / -0

Did they hide the part about her relatives being slaveowners??

39
Vashts1985 39 points ago +39 / -0

"does that mean its blank now?"

37
slimcoat 37 points ago +37 / -0

Wikipedia is a shithole. Use Infogalactic.com.

26
jgalt87 [S] 26 points ago +27 / -1

Once they learn about that one they'll 1984 it too. Retreat means death, give them nothing, remember everything they've taken from you already.

8
slimcoat 8 points ago +8 / -0

How do you propose fighting the thousands of commie sycophantic editors firmly entrenched in Wikipedia? I say we build our own and defend it.

5
4
slimcoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also a good one.

3
PM_ME_UR_MAGIC_CARDS 3 points ago +3 / -0

That site is garbage :/

4
jgalt87 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fair enough.

34
preferredfault 34 points ago +34 / -0

They try to make it sound like Wiki editors are arguing over it, but they have a strict policy where they will immediately ban anyone doing edits they disagree with. So I find it hard to believe someone can edit the page hundreds of times, but never get an account ban.....unless they're doing EXACTLY what the Wiki admins want to do.

Fact: There are NO conservative admins at Wikipedia. Not a single one. They're all liberal SJW's.

I got banned from there right away a few years back when Comey was fired. They were editing the hell out of his page and explicitly adding attacks against Trump. Not a record of attacks against Trump, but the literal wording of the information was multiple attacks on Trump, just biased. So I edited it nicely in a restrained manner to remove all the biased wording in the article.

Had my account banned and the only thing I could access was my own account page. The admin who did it went in and started to edit my personal account page, openly taunting me. When I edited my own page to remove their taunts, they then removed my access from even my own personal private account page.

I used the appeal ban function dozens of times, and it was immediately shot down every single time almost immediately. At one point they said I could have my account unlocked if I apologized for editing the biased article. I did not bother. Account is still locked and I've never visited Wikipedia again. I don't go there for anything. It's a liberal cesspool, and it needs to stop being treated like the worlds encyclopedia. It's not. It's just a bunch of liberal losers who babysit pages and rewrite history how they want it to be.

13
jive-ass-turkey 13 points ago +13 / -0

You should document the experience in a long form blog post. I bet you if it was done well you'd have a decent chance of getting it picked up by the media.

They are dying for this information from a primary source.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I see, they only really have a "finished content" contact. But yeah it's definitely an easy story, because all of the edits on wiki, including the discussions on pages, are archived entirely, even stuff that's been removed are still archived. So a person could follow every event of what happened in its entirety.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
30
bigmikesballs 30 points ago +30 / -0

Still a cum dumpster no matter wikipedia edits.

22
TennesseePride 22 points ago +22 / -0

If she thinks that will make people forget, then she is smoking crack again.

11
WinstonSmith1984 11 points ago +11 / -0

I thought she more of a pole addict

2
TennesseePride 2 points ago +2 / -0

haha, good call.

1
christ93_1 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol

1
WilburPudding 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you think the democrats won’t be able to convince their sheep to memory hole it, you’re the one smoking crack.

15
Ninjavideo 15 points ago +15 / -0

The winners write the history ... PEDES DO YOU WANT TO LOSE?

12
Bye-den 12 points ago +12 / -0

apparently she no longer participated in the 1st democratic candidate debate, or if she did, she had nothing to say about Biden being a racist for opposing bussing in the 1970s.

"that little girl...was not me"

10
kratomlol 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well looks she is the VP pick

9
jennyfrutex 9 points ago +9 / -0

literally just because of her skin color

4
WinstonSmith1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know; I heard she has other , um, talents

9
jennyfrutex 9 points ago +9 / -0

just imagine if she were a blonde-haired white woman who used sexual favors to gain career favors and had the kind of prosecutorial record Kamala has, pushing non-violent black offenders into prison. the Left would crucify her.

1
WinstonSmith1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

True.

10
Xal1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lol the prosecutor of evil gonna get rekt by the trump train

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
cleanyourbloodyroom 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think it's weird that she has more slaveholders in her family than I do.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
Shitlordstarklefevre 8 points ago +8 / -0

Do we have an archive?

5
Kornstalx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wikipedia edits are visible. You can look at past versions of the page.

8
PepesCovfefe 8 points ago +8 / -0

For now.

1
BladderBeerPoopin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank Hell for blockchain.

Wait..... Nah.

7
jennyfrutex 7 points ago +7 / -0

let's all remember that she fucked her way into a career

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
7
Dreyfus 7 points ago +7 / -0

DO NOT DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA !!!

They are campaigning now. I’ve received 2 emails from them asking for funding. No !

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
WinstonSmith1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

JOE and BLOW 2020!

2
jennyfrutex 2 points ago +2 / -0

YEP

5
NvJohansson 5 points ago +5 / -0

She was raised in Westmount, Quebec which is the second richest borough in all of Canada. She didnt ride a bus to school, she was chauffeur'd like every kid at Westmount high. Facts matter, especially dealing with a compulsive liar.

https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/montreal-real-estate-westmount-prices-hit-a-new-high

https://montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/brownstein-alumna-kamala-harris-sparks-excitement-at-westmount-high

5
unicornpoop 5 points ago +5 / -0

The fact of whoring her way up the political ladder? Disgrace to women.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
EqualityMeansAll 4 points ago +6 / -2

CRIME-BILL BIDEN & TOUGH ON BLACKS HARRIS

Are they trying to lose the black vote???

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
EqualityMeansAll 1 point ago +3 / -2

Hands Up Heels Up Harris

4
-Lumenatra 4 points ago +4 / -0

Called it in May: https://imgur.com/a/K1U4w2F

3
mikejones 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gotta do this before they announce her as VP

3
CmonPeopleGetReal 3 points ago +4 / -1

And it will be locked from any further editing until after the election. Pedes, any time you check a wiki page go back and look at the edit history, you can see the dates and changes made every time a page is edited.

3
Trumpence 3 points ago +3 / -0

By the Biden campaign.

3
Joeret 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think Pence could easily handle her in a debate. He might need to get his hands dirty a little bit though because you know she’ll be playing dirty.

2
williammcfadden 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is so solid quality on any topic. But he needs to be very slightly more dynamic otherwise he appears to be a bit aloof or removed.

3
UndocumentedRedditor 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is what I love best about this site. Fascinating article about predicting outcomes through internet autism.

3
WinstonSmith1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

... and stains

3
LLegendary 3 points ago +3 / -0

She's linked to Jussie.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
minotaurbeach 3 points ago +3 / -0

She was a cop- right? LOL

2
Cstriker01 2 points ago +2 / -0

She’s the VP for Biden. Hands down. He will resign a few months in if he wins, handing it over to her.

The woman who enslaves Californians and does drugs all while prosecuting people for doing drugs.

2
Rodrigo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wikipedia is as reliable as gas station sushi.

2
bagabond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally separate from her politics (which are horrible and regardless just follow the dictates of the woke mob) I really think she's a terrible choice from a strategic position (so good for the country's best interest in that she'll sink the ticket). She seems incapable of coming across as a not bitch, and when she talks she has to stop every fifth word to do this weird nasal thing. She's a defective retard. So, I guess a good match for Joe! I'd be surprised if black people even identify her as black and show up to vote for a VP to the same percentage as they did Barry. But, who knows?

2
SAW2TH 2 points ago +2 / -0

She’s gonna be the pick.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TweeterInChief 2 points ago +2 / -0

We all know what Camel Toe Harris really is. Wiki could paint her to look like black Cinderella. She’s nothing more than willy browns old used up slut.

2
Rugar22 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need to boycott Wikipedia.

2
Flipbarryfromreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never forget her relationship w Willie Brown

2
chopz 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why we must never let books or written media like newspapers to die.

2
MudDog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey hey hey! Kamala is an inspiration! She's shown little girls that no matter who you are, no matter your gender or your skin color, anyone has what it takes to sleep their way to the top!

2
MagnanimousDonkey 2 points ago +3 / -1

Most of her 400+ edits coming from a single user "Bnguyen1114".

Calling all autists - anyone tied to the DNC and/or Harris with the name B. Nguyen?

2
masshole3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Heels up!

2
keeponwinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anybody else amused that all of her supporters are going to take it laying down?

2
Juicebusters 2 points ago +2 / -0

We live in such a bizarro world that this lady was trying to tell Biden something about how she was one of those little black girls on a segregated bus and all this.

She has ZERO African-American ancestry and really try and get her age, her generation: She was a rich girl living in a Canadian suburb in the 1980s. She might have taken a bus to see ''Star Wars" at the local cinema and loved that song by Juice Newton on her grad dance.

It's like a 'Twilight Zone' she's talking like she was something in the 1960s American Civil Rights movement and people don't even question it.