Numbers no one on the left bothered to look up. The lockdown should only be restricted to seniors (and people with lung issues) and people close to them.
Pregnant women are impacted. Placentas are damaged by the virus.
Not sure why pro-life people refuse to care about the unborn when it comes to their decisions. Imagine being able to keep the unborn safe and saying, "Fuck it!"
That "study" was 16 women. Not 160, not 1,600. Not 16,000.
16
The "study" notes that about half of pregnancies show signs of a "damaged" placenta. The researchers even mentioned that such damage is so common they cannot clearly identify any causational relationship at this point.
The moral of this story? Be skeptical of what you hear from the media. And this isn't new! Journalists aren't scientists. This has been a phenomenon that I've seen for decades. Preliminary study is released. Conclusion is basically, we see a possible correlation, so we feel this is worth some actual study. Journalist finds the study, and incorrectly reads that we have now found a cure for this or that.
Good.
More spread = faster herd immunity.
Rising cases, especially in younger populations, while the death rate continues to decline, is a good thing.
99% recovery. 0.4% mortality.
Numbers no one on the left bothered to look up. The lockdown should only be restricted to seniors (and people with lung issues) and people close to them.
Pregnant women are impacted. Placentas are damaged by the virus.
Not sure why pro-life people refuse to care about the unborn when it comes to their decisions. Imagine being able to keep the unborn safe and saying, "Fuck it!"
That "study" was 16 women. Not 160, not 1,600. Not 16,000.
16
The "study" notes that about half of pregnancies show signs of a "damaged" placenta. The researchers even mentioned that such damage is so common they cannot clearly identify any causational relationship at this point.
The moral of this story? Be skeptical of what you hear from the media. And this isn't new! Journalists aren't scientists. This has been a phenomenon that I've seen for decades. Preliminary study is released. Conclusion is basically, we see a possible correlation, so we feel this is worth some actual study. Journalist finds the study, and incorrectly reads that we have now found a cure for this or that.