101 The Supreme Court on Thursday shot down a ruling from a lower court that would have eased voting restrictions in Alabama during the coronavirus pandemic. (twitter.com) posted 316 days ago by Donald17 316 days ago by Donald17 +101 / -0 2 comments share 2 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (2) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 4 ▼ – A_Flappy_Civic 4 points 316 days ago +4 / -0 The restrictions were witness requirements for mail in ballots. Doesn't strike down mail in but it does require ID and witnesses for a ballot to be valid. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – RocketSurgeon22 1 point 316 days ago +1 / -0 How is that enforced exactly? permalink parent save report block reply
The restrictions were witness requirements for mail in ballots. Doesn't strike down mail in but it does require ID and witnesses for a ballot to be valid.
How is that enforced exactly?