759
Comments (41)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
13
lion_streezus 13 points ago +14 / -1

I decided to actually look into this because you were so annoying, and I'm changing my tone.

LOOK FAGGOT NOW WILL YOU STFU

The OP is saying Trump advocated for it by saying it had a chance to be a real game changer and was shit on for it, and you're stuck on some stupid fucking semantics like a shill.

-1
TonsOfSalt -1 points ago +2 / -3

Don't hate on people for sharing facts. There is a substantive difference between outright promoting and saying it could be a game changer.

2
lion_streezus 2 points ago +3 / -1

He was vouching for it? What word makes your feelings not hurt?

0
TonsOfSalt 0 points ago +1 / -1

Facts. Not Feelings.

4
lion_streezus 4 points ago +4 / -0

The President brought the drug into public awareness and said it had a chance to be a game changer, and the media shit on him for it, and now there's an article saying he was correct. What are you disagreeing with? The guy you are defending is saying it was never promoted, but then what do you call that so we can be in agreement?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
4
lion_streezus 4 points ago +4 / -0

He said it "could" be one. That's all you're arguing like a blowhard.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
lion_streezus 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are arguing a minute fact as being more important than it is to the point of this post and sticking to it, for what reason? Is it making you feel superior or something? A normal person would just clarify and move on, but you're so stuck on people being dumb for calling it a game changer like that's at all important to the sequence of events, when it's not.

2
rentfREEEE_since2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re being a concern troll. And you glow in the dark like a faggot.