Probably wouldn’t have happened if women had been happy when they actually got equal rights. If they’d put it to bed at that point they wouldn’t now have degenerate man-failures trying to piggyback. Unfortunately they got greedy, wanted special rights and got their “movement” co-opted, now here we are. Hard to feel sorry, and obviously not all women want special status but enough do that it’s a problem.
to be honest, most women didn't want 'equal rights' in the sense of becoming a vote bank. And look what a disaster it's become.
Heck, I would even say that turning every male American into a voting bank was probably pretty twisted, and making them think you're doing them a favor too.
I’m by no means saying all women, although it may come across as that. I have no problem with equal rights for women, but they are at that point now and have been awhile, but the fight continued, that is the problem I’m getting at.
By vote bank I assume you mean like a bloc that an organization strategized they could capitalize on if that group was granted the right to vote. I’ve never really thought of the why voting rights were expanded but it just makes sense that some group thought they could use it to advantage and would support it for that reason. They do that now by importing immigrants, ignoring illegals and this blm nonsense etc., it’s supported because Democrats think it will lock up voting blocs for them.
usually the claim is that 'you aren't represented in gov't unless you vote', but individual voters don't gain representation by themselves voting, only by being part of a coalition or party. Moreover, husbands and fathers didn't vote AGAINST their wives or daughters interests; and by in large husbands and wives did vote together even after womens' suffrage.
Yet, appealing to the female voter (women ARE the biological majority) is the baseline post-womens-suffrage, just as appealing to the working-man is post universal suffrage. This would seem to validate the belief of socialists and feminists, but that's only because they don't know how advertising works. When we say 'appealing', we mean 'appealing to base passions' - fear, lust, greed, etc, and not to a reasoned consideration of their interests as a bloc, even.
However, what is totally missed is that treating workers or women as a bloc across all other groups, geography, associations and jurisdictions is a huge power-grab and enormously disruptive of regional and local interests by nature.
As a rule, the left has tried to grab power by destroying institutions that protect the interests of various people, in the name of protecting their interests. It's a failure of leadership and a loss of intellectual sovereignty.
Organizations, once their goal has been achieved, have a tendency to try and find ways to stay running. So, they sell a new problem, a new issue that needs to be "defeated". It isn't about making life better; it's about providing a continuous raison d'etre for the organization.
And this is a large part of why we get a lot of the craziness we see today.
Feminism turned women from "Staying at home, taking care of their kid, buying products with her husband's money to make dinner"
to
Women working minimum 40 hours weekly, not having time for relationships, and those lucky who got a job and a family are not able to see their kids too often, half of their salary is spent on nannies, and women are on more medications than ever before
And two incomes made the cost of housing go way up. Now people say they can’t survive without two incomes (we have for years) and want the government to pay for mom to stay home, which is exactly what we had before, but without the government having to get involved and pay for it.
Yeah my fiancee and I are dealing with this right now. We aren't poor, but we're barely self-sustainable, and that's with us both working full-time (and ironically, she's a nanny). We're getting old. We want to get married, buy a house, have a kid... we'd have liked to have done all three by now, but we just can't swing it. Every time I express any anxiety about this to my parents (usually my mom) she just tells me how we're still young (We really aren't, comparatively speaking as to when couples typically start families) and "it'll all work out," but it's getting frustrating. And even with this new standard of "dual-incomes," (which is horrible, and my fiancee wants to be a stay at home mom, and I want to be able to provide enough for her to be able to), there's still that same expectation (as there should be) that the man has to be the provider/generate the income, so it's this weird conundrum. And everything is so messed up, I've literally had people suggest "why don't you just have kids, not get married and pretend to both be single, and collect money from the government?" Hell no, I will never be a mooch and use my kids as an ATM. Meh, I'm venting now but it's just frustrating
Don't forget that you're already paying for the schooling and care of those apathetic enough to pop out kids on 11 month intervals. At $300,000 a pop just to get a publicly brainwashed kid to 18 with zero shot at a STEM degree from a based university... Fuck it. The wife and I are retiring to some tropical island instead.
The fact that women entered the workforce expanded the labor pool, it most certainly affected wages to the point that now you are most likely to be uncomfortable living on one income where before it was the norm.
No, women entering the workforce was akin to a population boom. Economies recover from that. Your money has been devalued by the fed via inflation and the cost of living increased through gross excessive regulation and taxes. Wages deflated by H1Bs and illegal aliens working jobs instead of Americans. The list goes on.
Those all have effects, I’m not saying you’re wrong overall. But I am saying you’re wrong if you think women working when previously they didn’t in general (work for pay not claiming women did nothing by any means) did not effect wages at all. What would happen if women just stopped now? A lot more competition for scarcer workers and children raised by their parents instead of daycare.
Most everyone was poor on one income. They didn't eat fancy. I also honestly don't see how anyone can have tasks at home to do all day 40 hours a week.... 4 hours to make sandwiches or drench cheap ground beef in tomato sauce? Vacuum 10 times a day?
idk man, my mom was a stay-at-home mom, and she was genuinely busy all day dealing with house chores, cooking, and us kids. It was a full-time job and I consider her super-woman for what she did for almost 25 years.
Of course that doesn't take away from my dad, who also worked a 40-hour week, but still took care of all the landscaping, house-repair type stuff, etc. They're two different roles, but both take a lot of effort. My fiancee is currently a nanny. She'll come home exhausted and I'll bust her balls, and she'll be like "you just don't understand," and I'll just laugh and be like, "I mean, I do... I worked ~60 hours a week of hard labor in a boiling hot garage, trust me, I understand the concept of work tiring you out." It's just a different kind of exhaustion, and a different kind of job
You don't need to have tasks at home. You can relax. Work out, read a book, watch a movie, help your children, there are many things you can do which benefit you... instead of working a dead end job you hate to please your boss.
People are even poorer right now, you probably had some higher class citizens in mind when you wrote that, the middle class and below are more worn out now while their financial power stayed the same
Yet women do their absolute damndest not to take equal responsibility. Planned parenthood, WIC, welfare, alimony, child support, affirmative action, net tax recipients, and no selective service... Coming from the same gender that initiates over 75% of divorces and receives child custody 90% of the time.
Why in the fuck are they still allowed to vote? Voting is a privilege earned through sacrifice, and women haven't earned it. They aren't even keeping birth rates above replacement. It's time to unironically repeal the 19th.
Women as a demographic, through every measurable statistic, have demonstrated themselves to be wholly irresponsible and reliant on government (I.e. male-funded) services to stay on par with men. It's time to put an end to this idiotic experiment, and it's time to put an end to the myth of gender egalitarianism. Women have always been reliant on men for their survival, the government is merely acting as a layer of abstraction. Cut this welfare shit out, repeal the 19th, and women will return to the nuclear family setup out of necessity. Capiche?
But feminism has been all the “rights” (privileges) without any of the responsibilities.
Did you know that there was a big faction of women who OPPOSED suffrage, because they didn’t want the full responsibilities of citizenship, such as the draft?
Men being different from women is true, and it is my hope that you misspoke when you said equal rights for all wasn't a noble cause. It is the MOST noble of causes, I would die for your rights, the same as I would for any American man woman or child.
-However-
If you're arguing against equal rights, then fuck you very much. The whole point of America is that we all are endowed by our creator with unalienable rights.
What we choose to do with them as individuals can and should determine the extent to which we should be allowed to keep them. I don't want criminals voting, I don't particularly think the second amendment applies to incarcerated prisoners, etc.
But we all, regardless of genitalia, skin pigment, or parentage have equal rights. And you'll deny those to an American over my smoldering corpse.
Men and women are different, trannies are fucked in the head, and Muslims are pedo worshipping death cultists, but their rights are equal to yours or mine.
If the founders thought the constitution was perfect they wouldn’t have made it amendable.
And what led to this mess is conservatives checking themselves out of the culture. They’ve retreated into enclaves repeatedly, for decades, and have been repeatedly been shocked when left wing commies take over cities, schools and institutions.
They also couldn’t imagine nukes. Commies work by corrupting existing systems. It doesn’t matter what rules you put in place, they will subvert them. The only thing that will stop them is maintaining a culture that knows better than to listen to them.
I want to preface this by saying, in today's day and age, I agree with all citizens having the right to vote (because the government has expanded so much [which I don't agree with, but here we are] that policies to be voted on effect us all. So we should all have a say). However, the founders had a far smaller government in mind, and having voting rights only for those who owned property, as it originally was, was a system that worked better. They wrote about it extensively in the back-and-forth in the federalist and anti-federalist papers, and both sides pretty damn-well understood that the majority of the population would never be informed enough to vote and it was a dangerous concept, but that they had to figure out a way to make a government "of the people, for the people and by the people." That's why we ultimately settled on a representative republic. The biggest problem is that the federal government ultimately grew far too large, and the concept of "democracy," has been overtaking the concept of a representative republic and most don't understand or see how that progression has unfolded
If your solution to our ills is to retain rights for yourself while denying them to others, then you are a worthless leftist.
Our argument is now, and has always been that we already have equal rights, and feel free to point out where we don't. To which the average leftist, or you apparently, would say that gays couldn't get married. This is false. Gay men had the same right to marry a woman as the rest of us. Where your idiotic argument falls apart is that you equate rights with privilege, argue against privilege, and think you've successfully argued against rights.
I'll issue you the same challenge I did the other idiot. Please name ONE right you wish to retain for yourself and deny to others.
I didn't say jack shit about respect. "Rights" motherfucker, "rights". Please feel free to re read what I wrote, and find the part where I suggested we had, or even should treat the other side with respect. Which you can't, because I didn't.
So that makes your response really, really weird. Are you stupid, and forgot what I wrote in the three seconds between when you read it and crafted a response? Or are you a goddamn liar who needs to create strawmen to argue against when your initial position has no solid ground on which to stand?
Or, better yet, simply answer this 1 challenge.
Name ONE right you wish to retain for yourself while denying it to other citizens of the US.
Idk about other people, but I'm right on the edge of millennial/gen Z and it's millennials doing this bullshit not the gen Z people I know. Might just be anecdotal.
It's a certain demo of the millennials imo. I'm a 80s born millennial, and I think we're wayyyyyy different than those born around 91 and later. The closer you get to '91, the more millennials are insane. I'm a late 80s born, and I'd say it's about a 50/50 split of sanity and craziness with my peers. However, I'm also in grad school now so I come in contact with a lot of kids around 22 years old (so, born around 98... is that millennial still?) In any case, these kids are CRAZY. Like, batshit insane; and the colleges/professors are making it far worse and enabling their insanity
I’m 1990 so I think I’m just a solid millennial and yeah, I don’t know if I’m different because of my time in the forces or I just got lucky, but I’d agree and say the vast majority of the problem are people my age.
the whole thing is so fucking weird because it came out/got huge when i was like 15 or 16 and i remember people my age and even older being like obsessed with it. it's a fucking kid's book for crying out loud.
I enjoyed the novels too, they were interesting and fun. Also quite conservative I always thought, like many good stories. I've always wondered why writers who are rabid crazy leftists manage to write good stuff that obviously champions conservative or small government ideals. Like what's-his-face who did Firefly (the TV series). They should read/watch their own stuff!
the books are written for children yet have always been popular with a large number of adults. i think that's a little weird and i don't remember it ever happening before in my lifetime.
i like books written for adults about adult subjects that take place in the real world. there are almost no exceptions to this personal rule of thumb. sorry if that offends you, but feel free to enjoy your series of children's books though.
Watched some of the movies, not my thing, but from what I've heard, she created an extremely detailed universe and told a story millions of people want to hear with zero experience as a writer while sitting in a coffee shop. I highly respect that and I think she deserves every penny she has earned. Pure capitalism, she worked hard to give the readers what they wanted.
Anyone around here who has fond memories of those books needs to go back and re-read them. Red-pill outlook. No nostalgia glasses.
Harry Potter is trash. It was always trash. Trash writing, trash world-building, trash characters. Trash author. TRASH.
And yes, it was a Millennial thing. I don’t think it can ever be another generation’s. Again, re-read those goddamn books. Ask yourself if a 16 year old would enjoy the first one, or if you could bring yourself to read the last to an 8 year old. She “aged up” the books to “grow with her audience” (although I will contend that there is less disturbing imagery in fucking Warhammer novels than in some of those later HP books), and therefore are not age-appropriate for any specific age of kid, reading them all the way through at once.
They tried to cancel her a couple years ago by saying her books were full of racism and stereotypes.
The strategy seems to be to cancel bigger and bigger names so that more people fear them and will give in to them. Seems to be working. I am amazed how many people and businesses have just rolled over for the current movements.
Seriously. The woman wrote an extremely conservative series and she doesn't fucking realize it. The Death Eaters are literally the KKK. They don't just kill non-magical people but also purebloods who refuse to be racists and bigots. Some purebloods (like Ron's family) are the most accepting people in the magical world because they don't give a shit what your lineage is, they'll treat you like family as long as you aren't a massive dick. Other purebloods (like the Malfoy's) are racist assholes. Pretty much paralleling the racist Democrats and the Republicans who believed in equality.
Umbridge is a psycho government employee turned teacher who infiltrated the school and tried to spread propaganda and disarm the students. Unmarried miserable cat lady.
Lol Azkaban was my favorite part about the books. Like either she didn’t think it thru at all, or she’s so goody two shoes she thinks anyone caught with a joint should be executed on the spot. It’s a prison fit only for the worst scum in society, but she was willing to send a 13 year old harry there for accidentally blowing up his aunt and a 16 year old harry there for using a purely defense magic (patronus spell) to save him and his cousin. (Those were the consequences for using magic underage and harry even had a full trial with witnesses in the 6th book)
To be fair, in Chamber of Secrets, Harry only thought he would be going to Azkaban, typical irrational teenage fear IMO. But in OOTP the Ministry was out to get him because they were in denial about Voldemort having returned.
Remember when harry and his asshole cousin get attacked by death eaters and he has to use magic to save them but he gets expelled because he's not 17? Then Dumbledore has to pull some strings to get him into school again. Isnt the whole point of that scene to show what a bullshit law that is because harry was and a muggle would have been tortured to death if not for using self defense measures?
There's also a whole mess of laws about using magic outside the magical world, so you can't just go on some shooting spree, and people are held accountable for misuse of their firear-- i mean, wands.
Having the villains be a Nazi analog isn’t conservative. That’s literally the most liberal villain you can have. Having the villains be people who want to keep their culture pure is liberal. Invalidating the argument that cultures have the right to protect themselves is liberal. (But of course, the wizards are massive dicks themselves, something that she doesn’t handle very well. Consider that with the HP concept that magic can fix fucking literally anything, including Down’s Syndrome, and they choose to never ever help the Muggles... the entire wizarding world is fucking racist as hell.)
Have you ever seen that 4chan greentext about what probably happened after HP? Where Muggles start demanding entrance to Hogwarts and magic becomes just a “social construct” whose exercise makes the non-magic folks uncomfortable so the wizards are forced to give it up?
Because that’s what would happen. Because there’s no goddamn balance in those books. Anything you remember about balance, nuance, or conservative messaging is projection.
Having the villains be a Nazi analog isn’t conservative. Having the villains be people who want to keep their culture pure is liberal. Invalidating the argument that cultures have the right to protect themselves is liberal.
What would a HP villain from a conservative perspective look like then?
Yeah, same. I always saw her more as milquetoast fare than hard left. You could tell she knew her stuff from the writing, but she kept getting caught up in paying lip service to the PC monster, even when it made no sense. (Black Hermione? When there were already a vast number of well-loved characters of various ethnicities in the series? Sorry, but no.)
If she ever ends up apologizing to Trump (and by proxy, her fans), I'll take it.
I enjoyed the movies just fine. When she's in storyteller mode and under pressure to write something that isn't garbage, her reflexes are surprisingly conservative. A male-led coming of age story about about a school packed with weapons where everyone is taught to protect their own lives and the lives of their loved ones? The students form a secret militia because they don't trust the authorities? It's funny that leftists think it's some sort of affirmation of their worldview.
And let’s not forget the Minister of Magic used the mainstream media to discredit Harry&Co for speaking the truth. And a cat lady activist took over the school and was canceling everything.
The Death Eaters are literally the KKK. They don't just kill non-magical people, they also kill fellow purebloods who don't tolerate the Death Eater's racism and bigotry.
Just like how Democrat KKK members went after blacks and whites who believed in equality.
That's a fair point. Most leftists believe the KKK only targeted black people when they actually were lynching whites for helping them as well. If she doesn't know that, it's just a coincidence that popped up in her story. We can still use it to explain reality. I mean, they use Harry Potter to try to explain things that make no sense anyway.
Granted... but I'm not in the habit of defending the worst actors on the political right, so why would I care about lazy strawmen depicting them in pop culture? My overall point is that Rowling accidentally wrote a center-right story because all coherent storytelling relies on traditional values. I find humor in that because most of her Twitter usage has been obnoxiously leftist. Now she's discovered she's a TERF. I wonder how that will play out. michaeljacksonpopcorn.gif
You know Antifa is down with weapons and self-defense, right? You’re aware that the far left is perfectly happy to commit violence in the name of their truth? That most liberals actually see themselves as fighting a deep conspiracy in our government that is right wing?
She didn’t write a conservative story just because those things are in there. Those are Romantic elements that appeal to everybody and massage everybody’s ego. Everyone wants to see themselves as fighting for a cause, against a bigger power.
Stop looking at the story structure and take a deeper look at the small themes that run through the books.
Over 65 million dipshits voted for Hillary in 2016. Those are leftists. If you gathered all the armed Antifa (real members; not homeless people paid to start shit for a day), you'd be lucky to fill a high school auditorium. Leftist are not into weapons. Leftists who are are super fringe. All the main protagonists in Harry Potter (Harry, Ron, and Hermione) were heterosexuals who eventually married and started their own non-adoptive families. During the real arch of the story, they brandished weapons, believed that good would triumph over evil (meaning they weren't relativists), and worked hard to get ahead rather than advertise their oppression points and expect things to be handed to them. She had plenty of chances to write that kind of shit into the stories and didn't. After the fact, she went back and pretended characters were gay and stuff like that. None of her offered evidences of this are compelling.
This new speak is confusing me. Men who pretend to be women are trans-women? It makes more sense to me to call them trans-men. They are men who are trying to be transgendered.
Crossdressers don't quite capture it. As those are often people who know they're men, acknowledge they're men and do it for fun. Perhaps a twisted idea of fun but fun nevertheless.
Transgenders are, on the other hand, proper mentally ill. To them, crossdressing is a lifestyle. "Not passing" (something most crossdressers don't give a damn about) will cause them to have a mental breakdown. Not being referred to as by their made up pronouns will cause them to have a mental breakdown. A JK Rowling tweet will cause them to have a mental breakdown. It shouldn't be surprising. After all, you are literally basing your entire lifestyle on a fetish.
They will take hormones to permanently ruin their bodies. They will use surgery to permanently ruin their genitals. And once that does not solve their underlying depression, they will kill themselves and the transgender "community" will blame Donald Trump for it.
Have you ever seen what transgender surgery is? For male-to-females, they will remove the penis and invert the skin (meaning the bigger the penis, the deeper the non-vagina will be). This is a wound that your body tries to close up. You need to dialate it (insert objects into it) several times a day for months and years, as your body will try to close up the wound. If not treated with care and given proper hygiene (which transgenders rarely do), the wound will leak pus and fester, causing immense pain and a disturbing smell.
For female-to-males, they form a penis-shaped (though in most images, it looks simply like a store-bought sausage) by covering up some thing (don't ask me what it is, I have no idea) in blotches of skin removed from the person's arm. Imagine your arm having giant rectangular bits of skin removed from it and flesh being visible. For a result that looks less convincing than a $2 strap-on. It is legitimately more disturbing than Isis/Mexican cartel beheading videos in the level of gore. I will spare you from the images but you can easily find it if you are so inclined for whatever reason.
The worst part is that whole "not passing" element is why they've been trying so hard to push hormones onto adolescent children, to ensure that they "pass". It's disgusting Even if you support a person's choice to ruin their own body and life however they please (which I do, even if I find it disturbing), pushing that onto children is irreversible child abuse.
100%. Tim is completely for Trump but he is putting on the centrist act for views, which is great. He’s getting actual centrists and some leftists to watch his videos and red pilling them.
Douglas Murray gets into this quite a bit in The Madness of Crowds (great book, btw). He exposes the whole "trans" movement for the thoroughly anti-woman movement it is. Boys earning trophies in girls' sports; Men claiming to be women even though they never even experienced puberty as a woman; And then to suggest that men can have babies too?! JK is right here. Trans activists are, intentionally or not, perhaps the most destructive force to feminism (and I'm not talking just lunatic, man-hating neofeminism) today.
Person A: "Hey! I'm a woman....but....but...I feel like a man :/ "
Person B: "I'm a man....but I feel like a woman!"
Psychriatrists: Well...Person A....you should take MAN HORMONES TO BECOME A MAN.....and.....Person B: you should take WOMEN HORMONES TO BECOME A WOMAN! AND BOTH OF YOU SHOULD DO SURGERY WHICH COSTS LOTS OF MONEY!
How it should be:
Psychiatrist: Yeah, you have some issues. Person A....take FEMALE HORMONES, it should help you feel more like yourself in your body. Person B.....take MALE HORMONES so you should feel more like your body! And come back to me so we can work on your mental issues but pleaaaaase go to doctor who will help you about your hormonal illness which is 100% an illness...but don't worry, being ill is normal and it's called being human..we can fix you!
I'm a Transwoman and JK is right, we are biological men and there's absolutely no way to change it.
I look nothing like a man at all due to Hormones, but JK is completely right.
She's doing it from a feminist perspective. But still, glad she's sticking to her guns. Who would have thought? I would agree on something with JK Rowling.
Imagine how fucking messed up you have to be to think that you can switch genders. I feel bad for these mentally ill people, because they are being manipulated by Liberals to permanently mutilate their bodies to fix a mental illness.
She is not red pilled. She's a TERF. She's only against trans rights because, like all TERFs, she is a virulent man hater. She can't stand the fact that men pretending to be women are trying to get a slice of that sweet sweet victim bucks.
If she was red pilled, she would disavow feminism but she still hold steadfastly to feminist cancer. It is metastasising and, I hope, eventually kill her.
I disagree. The only thing these so-called fans liked about the Harry Potter books was that Voldemort was a Nazi. JK Rowling has been constantly rewriting canon to appease this small demographic of people who whine too much about her original books being too white and male and straight. The movies turned to shit because of it. I enjoyed the books for the story not because JK Rowling decided to make the characters queer/POC/trans whatever AFTER the books were published.
Lol no she's not, she's just protecting herself from the new group that's oppressed: trans.
Let them fight among themselves, it's fun to watch. Also we can watch every stride taken by feminism for equality be taken over by men wearing dresses.
It's a beautiful thing to see when a leftist cuck gets devoured by the monster they helped to feed.
See, their whole existence and self-worth is based on this woke garbage. They need to be seen as virtuous and celebrated as a "correct-thinker" by others. This is why this pathetic loser made children's book characters homosexual and transracial and all this other crap -- she craved the attention and secular blessings that come with thinking the same way as everybody else.
When it comes their turn to be the nazi, it destroys them. Their entire existence is torn down from around them. They have nothing left, their lives lose all value. She is not going to take this well.
We, on the other hand. We were born "nazis", we live "nazi", we will die "nazis". We have been forged by leftist crocodile tears, their pathetic screeching is music to our ears, their pretend outrage sustains us. Their hate makes us stronger.
It's just another case of women fighting to keep their female privileges, laws, policies for themselves rather than actually wanting equality of some kind.
No, he means that they're taking an originally valid concept and then stretch it so much that it's blown out of existence, losing all meaning.
Probably wouldn’t have happened if women had been happy when they actually got equal rights. If they’d put it to bed at that point they wouldn’t now have degenerate man-failures trying to piggyback. Unfortunately they got greedy, wanted special rights and got their “movement” co-opted, now here we are. Hard to feel sorry, and obviously not all women want special status but enough do that it’s a problem.
to be honest, most women didn't want 'equal rights' in the sense of becoming a vote bank. And look what a disaster it's become.
Heck, I would even say that turning every male American into a voting bank was probably pretty twisted, and making them think you're doing them a favor too.
I’m by no means saying all women, although it may come across as that. I have no problem with equal rights for women, but they are at that point now and have been awhile, but the fight continued, that is the problem I’m getting at.
By vote bank I assume you mean like a bloc that an organization strategized they could capitalize on if that group was granted the right to vote. I’ve never really thought of the why voting rights were expanded but it just makes sense that some group thought they could use it to advantage and would support it for that reason. They do that now by importing immigrants, ignoring illegals and this blm nonsense etc., it’s supported because Democrats think it will lock up voting blocs for them.
usually the claim is that 'you aren't represented in gov't unless you vote', but individual voters don't gain representation by themselves voting, only by being part of a coalition or party. Moreover, husbands and fathers didn't vote AGAINST their wives or daughters interests; and by in large husbands and wives did vote together even after womens' suffrage.
Yet, appealing to the female voter (women ARE the biological majority) is the baseline post-womens-suffrage, just as appealing to the working-man is post universal suffrage. This would seem to validate the belief of socialists and feminists, but that's only because they don't know how advertising works. When we say 'appealing', we mean 'appealing to base passions' - fear, lust, greed, etc, and not to a reasoned consideration of their interests as a bloc, even.
However, what is totally missed is that treating workers or women as a bloc across all other groups, geography, associations and jurisdictions is a huge power-grab and enormously disruptive of regional and local interests by nature.
As a rule, the left has tried to grab power by destroying institutions that protect the interests of various people, in the name of protecting their interests. It's a failure of leadership and a loss of intellectual sovereignty.
Voting bank?
do you know the history of why franchises are expanded? It's pretty much always the same story: someone thinks they're going to get a vote bank.
Further, it dilutes the franchise of everyone else, especially insulting to those whose families fought and died to earn those political rights.
Organizations, once their goal has been achieved, have a tendency to try and find ways to stay running. So, they sell a new problem, a new issue that needs to be "defeated". It isn't about making life better; it's about providing a continuous raison d'etre for the organization.
And this is a large part of why we get a lot of the craziness we see today.
Feminism turned women from "Staying at home, taking care of their kid, buying products with her husband's money to make dinner"
to
Women working minimum 40 hours weekly, not having time for relationships, and those lucky who got a job and a family are not able to see their kids too often, half of their salary is spent on nannies, and women are on more medications than ever before
Yey feminism
And two incomes made the cost of housing go way up. Now people say they can’t survive without two incomes (we have for years) and want the government to pay for mom to stay home, which is exactly what we had before, but without the government having to get involved and pay for it.
You are right and it's depressing. Makes it for most men in America more difficult to maintain a family without the wife working. As it should be.
Yeah my fiancee and I are dealing with this right now. We aren't poor, but we're barely self-sustainable, and that's with us both working full-time (and ironically, she's a nanny). We're getting old. We want to get married, buy a house, have a kid... we'd have liked to have done all three by now, but we just can't swing it. Every time I express any anxiety about this to my parents (usually my mom) she just tells me how we're still young (We really aren't, comparatively speaking as to when couples typically start families) and "it'll all work out," but it's getting frustrating. And even with this new standard of "dual-incomes," (which is horrible, and my fiancee wants to be a stay at home mom, and I want to be able to provide enough for her to be able to), there's still that same expectation (as there should be) that the man has to be the provider/generate the income, so it's this weird conundrum. And everything is so messed up, I've literally had people suggest "why don't you just have kids, not get married and pretend to both be single, and collect money from the government?" Hell no, I will never be a mooch and use my kids as an ATM. Meh, I'm venting now but it's just frustrating
Don't forget that you're already paying for the schooling and care of those apathetic enough to pop out kids on 11 month intervals. At $300,000 a pop just to get a publicly brainwashed kid to 18 with zero shot at a STEM degree from a based university... Fuck it. The wife and I are retiring to some tropical island instead.
Also, with two people working and kids, the stress can create marital strife that often leads to divorce...
Two incomes didn’t do that. Federal, state and local laws and regulation did. Along with mass land buys from foreigners.
The fact that women entered the workforce expanded the labor pool, it most certainly affected wages to the point that now you are most likely to be uncomfortable living on one income where before it was the norm.
No, women entering the workforce was akin to a population boom. Economies recover from that. Your money has been devalued by the fed via inflation and the cost of living increased through gross excessive regulation and taxes. Wages deflated by H1Bs and illegal aliens working jobs instead of Americans. The list goes on.
Those all have effects, I’m not saying you’re wrong overall. But I am saying you’re wrong if you think women working when previously they didn’t in general (work for pay not claiming women did nothing by any means) did not effect wages at all. What would happen if women just stopped now? A lot more competition for scarcer workers and children raised by their parents instead of daycare.
Most everyone was poor on one income. They didn't eat fancy. I also honestly don't see how anyone can have tasks at home to do all day 40 hours a week.... 4 hours to make sandwiches or drench cheap ground beef in tomato sauce? Vacuum 10 times a day?
idk man, my mom was a stay-at-home mom, and she was genuinely busy all day dealing with house chores, cooking, and us kids. It was a full-time job and I consider her super-woman for what she did for almost 25 years.
Of course that doesn't take away from my dad, who also worked a 40-hour week, but still took care of all the landscaping, house-repair type stuff, etc. They're two different roles, but both take a lot of effort. My fiancee is currently a nanny. She'll come home exhausted and I'll bust her balls, and she'll be like "you just don't understand," and I'll just laugh and be like, "I mean, I do... I worked ~60 hours a week of hard labor in a boiling hot garage, trust me, I understand the concept of work tiring you out." It's just a different kind of exhaustion, and a different kind of job
Exactly
You don't need to have tasks at home. You can relax. Work out, read a book, watch a movie, help your children, there are many things you can do which benefit you... instead of working a dead end job you hate to please your boss.
People are even poorer right now, you probably had some higher class citizens in mind when you wrote that, the middle class and below are more worn out now while their financial power stayed the same
Raising little kids and actually cleaning up after them, cooking a real economical dinner takes time.
Also you are able to have a nice clean home. I have done. Sure wish I could have done it longer.
I hated working even when my kids were elementary age. You just need someone there to do homework plain and simple. I happen to like it.
I like yard work too. That stuff can't all be done on the weekend.
Feminism was never a noble cause, it was always meant to subvert and create a gender war.
Yet women do their absolute damndest not to take equal responsibility. Planned parenthood, WIC, welfare, alimony, child support, affirmative action, net tax recipients, and no selective service... Coming from the same gender that initiates over 75% of divorces and receives child custody 90% of the time.
Why in the fuck are they still allowed to vote? Voting is a privilege earned through sacrifice, and women haven't earned it. They aren't even keeping birth rates above replacement. It's time to unironically repeal the 19th.
Women as a demographic, through every measurable statistic, have demonstrated themselves to be wholly irresponsible and reliant on government (I.e. male-funded) services to stay on par with men. It's time to put an end to this idiotic experiment, and it's time to put an end to the myth of gender egalitarianism. Women have always been reliant on men for their survival, the government is merely acting as a layer of abstraction. Cut this welfare shit out, repeal the 19th, and women will return to the nuclear family setup out of necessity. Capiche?
Equality is a false god.
Well, some people do actually argue that there's no such thing as biological sex, but no intelligent people actually believe them...
But feminism has been all the “rights” (privileges) without any of the responsibilities.
Did you know that there was a big faction of women who OPPOSED suffrage, because they didn’t want the full responsibilities of citizenship, such as the draft?
Men being different from women is true, and it is my hope that you misspoke when you said equal rights for all wasn't a noble cause. It is the MOST noble of causes, I would die for your rights, the same as I would for any American man woman or child.
-However-
If you're arguing against equal rights, then fuck you very much. The whole point of America is that we all are endowed by our creator with unalienable rights.
What we choose to do with them as individuals can and should determine the extent to which we should be allowed to keep them. I don't want criminals voting, I don't particularly think the second amendment applies to incarcerated prisoners, etc.
But we all, regardless of genitalia, skin pigment, or parentage have equal rights. And you'll deny those to an American over my smoldering corpse.
Men and women are different, trannies are fucked in the head, and Muslims are pedo worshipping death cultists, but their rights are equal to yours or mine.
If the founders thought the constitution was perfect they wouldn’t have made it amendable.
And what led to this mess is conservatives checking themselves out of the culture. They’ve retreated into enclaves repeatedly, for decades, and have been repeatedly been shocked when left wing commies take over cities, schools and institutions.
The founders couldn't even imagine the insanity of the modern left though
They also couldn’t imagine nukes. Commies work by corrupting existing systems. It doesn’t matter what rules you put in place, they will subvert them. The only thing that will stop them is maintaining a culture that knows better than to listen to them.
What a strong retort to what I said. You have completely refuted my arguments.
/s
I want to preface this by saying, in today's day and age, I agree with all citizens having the right to vote (because the government has expanded so much [which I don't agree with, but here we are] that policies to be voted on effect us all. So we should all have a say). However, the founders had a far smaller government in mind, and having voting rights only for those who owned property, as it originally was, was a system that worked better. They wrote about it extensively in the back-and-forth in the federalist and anti-federalist papers, and both sides pretty damn-well understood that the majority of the population would never be informed enough to vote and it was a dangerous concept, but that they had to figure out a way to make a government "of the people, for the people and by the people." That's why we ultimately settled on a representative republic. The biggest problem is that the federal government ultimately grew far too large, and the concept of "democracy," has been overtaking the concept of a representative republic and most don't understand or see how that progression has unfolded
If your solution to our ills is to retain rights for yourself while denying them to others, then you are a worthless leftist.
Our argument is now, and has always been that we already have equal rights, and feel free to point out where we don't. To which the average leftist, or you apparently, would say that gays couldn't get married. This is false. Gay men had the same right to marry a woman as the rest of us. Where your idiotic argument falls apart is that you equate rights with privilege, argue against privilege, and think you've successfully argued against rights.
I'll issue you the same challenge I did the other idiot. Please name ONE right you wish to retain for yourself and deny to others.
I can not wait for the answer.
I didn't say jack shit about respect. "Rights" motherfucker, "rights". Please feel free to re read what I wrote, and find the part where I suggested we had, or even should treat the other side with respect. Which you can't, because I didn't.
So that makes your response really, really weird. Are you stupid, and forgot what I wrote in the three seconds between when you read it and crafted a response? Or are you a goddamn liar who needs to create strawmen to argue against when your initial position has no solid ground on which to stand?
Or, better yet, simply answer this 1 challenge.
Name ONE right you wish to retain for yourself while denying it to other citizens of the US.
So I take it you are too much of a coward to answer my simple challenge and list a single right you wish to reserve for yourself and deny to others?
Pussy.
So true
I've redpilled normies with the JK Rowling example. Literally nobody who isn't mentally deranged thinks that she isn't left wing enough.
Idk about other people, but I'm right on the edge of millennial/gen Z and it's millennials doing this bullshit not the gen Z people I know. Might just be anecdotal.
It's a certain demo of the millennials imo. I'm a 80s born millennial, and I think we're wayyyyyy different than those born around 91 and later. The closer you get to '91, the more millennials are insane. I'm a late 80s born, and I'd say it's about a 50/50 split of sanity and craziness with my peers. However, I'm also in grad school now so I come in contact with a lot of kids around 22 years old (so, born around 98... is that millennial still?) In any case, these kids are CRAZY. Like, batshit insane; and the colleges/professors are making it far worse and enabling their insanity
I’m 1990 so I think I’m just a solid millennial and yeah, I don’t know if I’m different because of my time in the forces or I just got lucky, but I’d agree and say the vast majority of the problem are people my age.
millennial here, never given a fraction of a shit about jk rowling or harry potter.
the whole thing is so fucking weird because it came out/got huge when i was like 15 or 16 and i remember people my age and even older being like obsessed with it. it's a fucking kid's book for crying out loud.
Not really. They are fantastic novels, really. Have you, idk, maybe tried reading them?
I enjoyed the novels too, they were interesting and fun. Also quite conservative I always thought, like many good stories. I've always wondered why writers who are rabid crazy leftists manage to write good stuff that obviously champions conservative or small government ideals. Like what's-his-face who did Firefly (the TV series). They should read/watch their own stuff!
OMG those novels are so shit.
Yes, read them all.
And yes, OP is right. It was a weird fucking stupid fad amongst Millennials.
Well, at least we got Alessandor Carrow out of it
what did i say that was incorrect?
the books are written for children yet have always been popular with a large number of adults. i think that's a little weird and i don't remember it ever happening before in my lifetime.
i like books written for adults about adult subjects that take place in the real world. there are almost no exceptions to this personal rule of thumb. sorry if that offends you, but feel free to enjoy your series of children's books though.
they were not just written for children. They were written for a generation.
that is the gayest thing i've heard in a long time. 🤣🤣🤣
Watched some of the movies, not my thing, but from what I've heard, she created an extremely detailed universe and told a story millions of people want to hear with zero experience as a writer while sitting in a coffee shop. I highly respect that and I think she deserves every penny she has earned. Pure capitalism, she worked hard to give the readers what they wanted.
Anyone around here who has fond memories of those books needs to go back and re-read them. Red-pill outlook. No nostalgia glasses.
Harry Potter is trash. It was always trash. Trash writing, trash world-building, trash characters. Trash author. TRASH.
And yes, it was a Millennial thing. I don’t think it can ever be another generation’s. Again, re-read those goddamn books. Ask yourself if a 16 year old would enjoy the first one, or if you could bring yourself to read the last to an 8 year old. She “aged up” the books to “grow with her audience” (although I will contend that there is less disturbing imagery in fucking Warhammer novels than in some of those later HP books), and therefore are not age-appropriate for any specific age of kid, reading them all the way through at once.
They tried to cancel her a couple years ago by saying her books were full of racism and stereotypes.
The strategy seems to be to cancel bigger and bigger names so that more people fear them and will give in to them. Seems to be working. I am amazed how many people and businesses have just rolled over for the current movements.
Took long enough. She fucking wrote about Cornelius Fudge and Delores fucking Umbridge. You'd think she see who resemble those behaviors.
Seriously. The woman wrote an extremely conservative series and she doesn't fucking realize it. The Death Eaters are literally the KKK. They don't just kill non-magical people but also purebloods who refuse to be racists and bigots. Some purebloods (like Ron's family) are the most accepting people in the magical world because they don't give a shit what your lineage is, they'll treat you like family as long as you aren't a massive dick. Other purebloods (like the Malfoy's) are racist assholes. Pretty much paralleling the racist Democrats and the Republicans who believed in equality.
Umbridge is a psycho government employee turned teacher who infiltrated the school and tried to spread propaganda and disarm the students. Unmarried miserable cat lady.
Yeah but you can’t use it outside of school til you’re 17 or YOULL GO TO JAIL WHERE DEMENTORS WILL EAT YOUR SOUL
Lol Azkaban was my favorite part about the books. Like either she didn’t think it thru at all, or she’s so goody two shoes she thinks anyone caught with a joint should be executed on the spot. It’s a prison fit only for the worst scum in society, but she was willing to send a 13 year old harry there for accidentally blowing up his aunt and a 16 year old harry there for using a purely defense magic (patronus spell) to save him and his cousin. (Those were the consequences for using magic underage and harry even had a full trial with witnesses in the 6th book)
To be fair, in Chamber of Secrets, Harry only thought he would be going to Azkaban, typical irrational teenage fear IMO. But in OOTP the Ministry was out to get him because they were in denial about Voldemort having returned.
Rowling didn’t think many things through. It’s an interesting but ultimately messy and illogical universe.
I guess the metaphor would be that the prisons are terrible where terrible things are happening and the government can't even question what happens
"What's that?
Jeffrey EpsteinSirius Black killed himself before exposing the bad guys? Ooooops...."Remember when harry and his asshole cousin get attacked by death eaters and he has to use magic to save them but he gets expelled because he's not 17? Then Dumbledore has to pull some strings to get him into school again. Isnt the whole point of that scene to show what a bullshit law that is because harry was and a muggle would have been tortured to death if not for using self defense measures?
Well, that wasn't supposed to happen. It was a corrupt government snatching an opportunity to mess with a self-defense case.
Funny how it mirrors the real world.
She's also got fake news and the deep state.
There's also a whole mess of laws about using magic outside the magical world, so you can't just go on some shooting spree, and people are held accountable for misuse of their firear-- i mean, wands.
Having the villains be a Nazi analog isn’t conservative. That’s literally the most liberal villain you can have. Having the villains be people who want to keep their culture pure is liberal. Invalidating the argument that cultures have the right to protect themselves is liberal. (But of course, the wizards are massive dicks themselves, something that she doesn’t handle very well. Consider that with the HP concept that magic can fix fucking literally anything, including Down’s Syndrome, and they choose to never ever help the Muggles... the entire wizarding world is fucking racist as hell.)
Have you ever seen that 4chan greentext about what probably happened after HP? Where Muggles start demanding entrance to Hogwarts and magic becomes just a “social construct” whose exercise makes the non-magic folks uncomfortable so the wizards are forced to give it up?
Because that’s what would happen. Because there’s no goddamn balance in those books. Anything you remember about balance, nuance, or conservative messaging is projection.
Liberals do not write conservative stories. Ever.
What would a HP villain from a conservative perspective look like then?
Imagine actually thinking the left hates nazis (assuming you understand what the nazis actually stood for in their National Socialist party)
Yeah, same. I always saw her more as milquetoast fare than hard left. You could tell she knew her stuff from the writing, but she kept getting caught up in paying lip service to the PC monster, even when it made no sense. (Black Hermione? When there were already a vast number of well-loved characters of various ethnicities in the series? Sorry, but no.)
If she ever ends up apologizing to Trump (and by proxy, her fans), I'll take it.
I'm using the save function to save this to a folder for lefties. They tend to equate things to Harry Potter, so this is perfect.
I enjoyed the movies just fine. When she's in storyteller mode and under pressure to write something that isn't garbage, her reflexes are surprisingly conservative. A male-led coming of age story about about a school packed with weapons where everyone is taught to protect their own lives and the lives of their loved ones? The students form a secret militia because they don't trust the authorities? It's funny that leftists think it's some sort of affirmation of their worldview.
And let’s not forget the Minister of Magic used the mainstream media to discredit Harry&Co for speaking the truth. And a cat lady activist took over the school and was canceling everything.
Haha... well-spotted.
Well the death eaters are blatant right wingers (and one hell of a bastardization).
The Death Eaters are literally the KKK. They don't just kill non-magical people, they also kill fellow purebloods who don't tolerate the Death Eater's racism and bigotry.
Just like how Democrat KKK members went after blacks and whites who believed in equality.
The Left largely doesn’t think that the Left is responsible for the KKK. Don’t confuse historical fact with the theme being presented.
She is not making an allusion to the KKK. It’s a right wing straw man.
That's a fair point. Most leftists believe the KKK only targeted black people when they actually were lynching whites for helping them as well. If she doesn't know that, it's just a coincidence that popped up in her story. We can still use it to explain reality. I mean, they use Harry Potter to try to explain things that make no sense anyway.
Granted... but I'm not in the habit of defending the worst actors on the political right, so why would I care about lazy strawmen depicting them in pop culture? My overall point is that Rowling accidentally wrote a center-right story because all coherent storytelling relies on traditional values. I find humor in that because most of her Twitter usage has been obnoxiously leftist. Now she's discovered she's a TERF. I wonder how that will play out. michaeljacksonpopcorn.gif
You know Antifa is down with weapons and self-defense, right? You’re aware that the far left is perfectly happy to commit violence in the name of their truth? That most liberals actually see themselves as fighting a deep conspiracy in our government that is right wing?
She didn’t write a conservative story just because those things are in there. Those are Romantic elements that appeal to everybody and massage everybody’s ego. Everyone wants to see themselves as fighting for a cause, against a bigger power.
Stop looking at the story structure and take a deeper look at the small themes that run through the books.
Over 65 million dipshits voted for Hillary in 2016. Those are leftists. If you gathered all the armed Antifa (real members; not homeless people paid to start shit for a day), you'd be lucky to fill a high school auditorium. Leftist are not into weapons. Leftists who are are super fringe. All the main protagonists in Harry Potter (Harry, Ron, and Hermione) were heterosexuals who eventually married and started their own non-adoptive families. During the real arch of the story, they brandished weapons, believed that good would triumph over evil (meaning they weren't relativists), and worked hard to get ahead rather than advertise their oppression points and expect things to be handed to them. She had plenty of chances to write that kind of shit into the stories and didn't. After the fact, she went back and pretended characters were gay and stuff like that. None of her offered evidences of this are compelling.
This new speak is confusing me. Men who pretend to be women are trans-women? It makes more sense to me to call them trans-men. They are men who are trying to be transgendered.
"mentally ill"
Crossdressers don't quite capture it. As those are often people who know they're men, acknowledge they're men and do it for fun. Perhaps a twisted idea of fun but fun nevertheless.
Transgenders are, on the other hand, proper mentally ill. To them, crossdressing is a lifestyle. "Not passing" (something most crossdressers don't give a damn about) will cause them to have a mental breakdown. Not being referred to as by their made up pronouns will cause them to have a mental breakdown. A JK Rowling tweet will cause them to have a mental breakdown. It shouldn't be surprising. After all, you are literally basing your entire lifestyle on a fetish.
They will take hormones to permanently ruin their bodies. They will use surgery to permanently ruin their genitals. And once that does not solve their underlying depression, they will kill themselves and the transgender "community" will blame Donald Trump for it.
Have you ever seen what transgender surgery is? For male-to-females, they will remove the penis and invert the skin (meaning the bigger the penis, the deeper the non-vagina will be). This is a wound that your body tries to close up. You need to dialate it (insert objects into it) several times a day for months and years, as your body will try to close up the wound. If not treated with care and given proper hygiene (which transgenders rarely do), the wound will leak pus and fester, causing immense pain and a disturbing smell.
For female-to-males, they form a penis-shaped (though in most images, it looks simply like a store-bought sausage) by covering up some thing (don't ask me what it is, I have no idea) in blotches of skin removed from the person's arm. Imagine your arm having giant rectangular bits of skin removed from it and flesh being visible. For a result that looks less convincing than a $2 strap-on. It is legitimately more disturbing than Isis/Mexican cartel beheading videos in the level of gore. I will spare you from the images but you can easily find it if you are so inclined for whatever reason.
The worst part is that whole "not passing" element is why they've been trying so hard to push hormones onto adolescent children, to ensure that they "pass". It's disgusting Even if you support a person's choice to ruin their own body and life however they please (which I do, even if I find it disturbing), pushing that onto children is irreversible child abuse.
Idk about you that meat sausage thing sounds fucking hot
///sss
I also like "female impersonator"
Gender appropriator
well that is disgusting.
My dick hurts just thinking about it. God no.
Bro. Come on now lol. I wish I could take a pic of the half eaten croissant that YOU MADE ME WASTE
Those are only words, the reality is worse.
A sacrifice no one asked for but everyone appreciates.
It helps if you translate "trans" to "towards". If you want to become a dildo, you're a transdildo.
I prefer translating "trans" as "fake"
Ha, much better indeed.
Wouldn't call it a "Red Pill"
Red pills are a voluntary change of heart.
She is getting shit on by her own, and caught in her own loop of hypocrisy.
Just like tim pool, he isn't red pilled, he'll prolly still vote Biden, despite mostly rational commentary
I'd say there's an equal parts chance he votes Trump and pretends not to just to keep up "centrist" appearances.
100%. Tim is completely for Trump but he is putting on the centrist act for views, which is great. He’s getting actual centrists and some leftists to watch his videos and red pilling them.
Some red pills come in suppository form
"The stomach is halfway between the mouth and the anus."
-jubyeonin
Remember when these people got the help they needed instead of being pumped full of hormones and getting their genitalia mutilated?
they are men with severe mental illnesses.
"If you were born with a penis, you are male. Sorry"
Oof
Queen of the terfs, make lgbdropthet.win please
Funny how every time you agree with someone's views, they are always "loving", even if the people you have been trained to hate, say the same thing.
Goddamn trans people are disgusting
Redpilled my ass, she's still a man-hating radfem, she just dares to include men who think they're women in her man-hating.
Douglas Murray gets into this quite a bit in The Madness of Crowds (great book, btw). He exposes the whole "trans" movement for the thoroughly anti-woman movement it is. Boys earning trophies in girls' sports; Men claiming to be women even though they never even experienced puberty as a woman; And then to suggest that men can have babies too?! JK is right here. Trans activists are, intentionally or not, perhaps the most destructive force to feminism (and I'm not talking just lunatic, man-hating neofeminism) today.
Omg this so well deserved. I love it when they turn on each other’s.
Shes been back pedalling from this ideology so hard I think the raiders are gonna offer her a contract
Ovarian privilege?
She is not red-pilled. She has taken a couple red pills recently, ill grant you, but I dont think her body can digest them properly.
Here's a Solomon solution lad!
How it is right now:
Person A: "Hey! I'm a woman....but....but...I feel like a man :/ "
Person B: "I'm a man....but I feel like a woman!"
Psychriatrists: Well...Person A....you should take MAN HORMONES TO BECOME A MAN.....and.....Person B: you should take WOMEN HORMONES TO BECOME A WOMAN! AND BOTH OF YOU SHOULD DO SURGERY WHICH COSTS LOTS OF MONEY!
How it should be:
Psychiatrist: Yeah, you have some issues. Person A....take FEMALE HORMONES, it should help you feel more like yourself in your body. Person B.....take MALE HORMONES so you should feel more like your body! And come back to me so we can work on your mental issues but pleaaaaase go to doctor who will help you about your hormonal illness which is 100% an illness...but don't worry, being ill is normal and it's called being human..we can fix you!
I'm a Transwoman and JK is right, we are biological men and there's absolutely no way to change it. I look nothing like a man at all due to Hormones, but JK is completely right.
They don't call her 'JK Tim Pool Rowling' for nothing.
If i was a billionaire id be on a yacht with models this bitch is arguing with mentally ill people on twitter
She's doing it from a feminist perspective. But still, glad she's sticking to her guns. Who would have thought? I would agree on something with JK Rowling.
These accounts are trolling her. And she responds to them like an idiot.
The tweeter she's talking to is a straight black man on the Ivory coast. 100%.
Imagine how fucking messed up you have to be to think that you can switch genders. I feel bad for these mentally ill people, because they are being manipulated by Liberals to permanently mutilate their bodies to fix a mental illness.
Haha your right haha
And now they can't control the Frankenstein's Monster that they unleashed. Too bad, so sad....
We told you! This is how those mentally unstable fucks behave, they are monsters and useless humans
It’s a jagged little pill, Rowling, but don’t spit it out
Bippity Boppity SHADILAY
The Magic Wand is waved, another Liberal saved
When even JK Rowling is tired of your SHIT
The day comes soon when Harry Potter books become ours and the left will no longer be able to use it as their Bible.
Strange times we live in. Strange times.
I don't know the left ever thought it could be their Bible, it's obviously a conservative story.
The structure might be, but the contents aren’t
Fuck J.K. Rowling.
Given half the chance she'd throw us all under the bus to save her own ass.
She is not red pilled. She's a TERF. She's only against trans rights because, like all TERFs, she is a virulent man hater. She can't stand the fact that men pretending to be women are trying to get a slice of that sweet sweet victim bucks.
If she was red pilled, she would disavow feminism but she still hold steadfastly to feminist cancer. It is metastasising and, I hope, eventually kill her.
They refuse to cancel her because they like Harry Potter too much. Mass hypocrisy on display.
I disagree. The only thing these so-called fans liked about the Harry Potter books was that Voldemort was a Nazi. JK Rowling has been constantly rewriting canon to appease this small demographic of people who whine too much about her original books being too white and male and straight. The movies turned to shit because of it. I enjoyed the books for the story not because JK Rowling decided to make the characters queer/POC/trans whatever AFTER the books were published.
Screw Rowling tho. Btw did you know that she's gay?
Way too many people with nostalgia boners for Harry Potter.
Lol no she's not, she's just protecting herself from the new group that's oppressed: trans.
Let them fight among themselves, it's fun to watch. Also we can watch every stride taken by feminism for equality be taken over by men wearing dresses.
No. Just pissed she can't pull the victim card because she is a woman anymore.
It's a beautiful thing to see when a leftist cuck gets devoured by the monster they helped to feed.
See, their whole existence and self-worth is based on this woke garbage. They need to be seen as virtuous and celebrated as a "correct-thinker" by others. This is why this pathetic loser made children's book characters homosexual and transracial and all this other crap -- she craved the attention and secular blessings that come with thinking the same way as everybody else.
When it comes their turn to be the nazi, it destroys them. Their entire existence is torn down from around them. They have nothing left, their lives lose all value. She is not going to take this well.
We, on the other hand. We were born "nazis", we live "nazi", we will die "nazis". We have been forged by leftist crocodile tears, their pathetic screeching is music to our ears, their pretend outrage sustains us. Their hate makes us stronger.
Dumbledor’s quiet wisdom lives.🤣🤣
Let’s go!!!!!!!!!!
Stupid fucking cunt.
It's just another case of women fighting to keep their female privileges, laws, policies for themselves rather than actually wanting equality of some kind.
Hahahahaha
Only biological women are in the ovaries club. You, on the other hand, are a dude who cut his dick off.