We need a group of armed and trained security to volunteer to live with the McCloskey's and make a stand and we need the mob to try and take the house. Even if it results in 1,000 dead "peaceful protestors" or it succeeds with the deaths of 300 defenders. It is an obvious wrong, let it be a collosal loss of life if that is what it will take. Let it serve as the line in the sand for a generation - you just can't mob rule property or livelihoods. We've already seen the mob rule take down hundreds of buildings that are private property and represent the livelihood of a dozen workers each, and the lifetime savings and labor of one to a dozen people per property. It's time to accept that people would rather die than to abondon all they work for and care for in their lifetime for wanton destruction. If they deem it as worth their life to defend it, and therefore it is surely worth your life should you try to take it. You have no greater right to take it and lose your life in the process than the rightful owner who has the right to lay down their life in defense of their lifetime of blood, sweat and tears earned property, wealth and possessions. They have already given their lives to gain it, they have a right to defend it at the expense of your life, should you try to deprive them with simply a moment of "get out, we want to destroy it" chants. And if they did succeed in stealing it away from you, what right would they claim that you can not take it back for yourself in the next moment? Right of possession should never simply go to the team that is on offense because they want it - right of possession clearly goes to the rightful purchaser and they need a right of defense or nobody will ever work for anything ever again.