Has anyone tried to explain what their ideal outcome would have been? car stops "excuse me sir? Do you have a minute to sign our blm petition?" More likely just waiting to stop someone white they could intimidate into violence.
So was the closure government sanctioned or was the highway “closed” because the protestors were blocking it? In the POV video, it appeared that the protestors were anticipating traffic and ran in front of the car on purpose. They all start screaming “CAR” like they were trying to take their place.
I read that too, but then talked to someone who lives in town, and they said that they havent closed the entire freeway every night... theyve been letting the terrorists protest on a section of convertible lanes, but they don't close the entire highway with the shit. idk
I do know that right in that area there are express lanes on the I5 that are tiered so they run along the freeway, but underneath it. I know those express lanes merge back up with the I5 right in the same area where the accident happened, but I can't remember exactly where.
IF the terrorists were allowed to protest in the express lanes, those are reversible lanes. AM they go one way. PM they go the other way. So they have all these barriccades they use to close the lanes as they're switching directions.
Prolly what happened is they closed both northbound and southbound barricades to keep people off the express lanes. But I know of two places where you can go around the barricade if you pull an illegal move, and people sometimes do it.
So the idea that the cops think just because the barriccades are up that means the terrorists are safe from the cars is asinine. Its like they don't know the shortcuts in their own city.
I was thinking this exact same thing. I actually dont think I-5 was "Closed" they are just using that to try and make it look "peaceful" and not disruptive.
Why is local government preventing citizens from using resources that their tax dollars pay for in the first place?
That's IS the right question.
Has anyone tried to explain what their ideal outcome would have been? car stops "excuse me sir? Do you have a minute to sign our blm petition?" More likely just waiting to stop someone white they could intimidate into violence.
So was the closure government sanctioned or was the highway “closed” because the protestors were blocking it? In the POV video, it appeared that the protestors were anticipating traffic and ran in front of the car on purpose. They all start screaming “CAR” like they were trying to take their place.
I read somewhere else that the highway patrol had it closed because there were people in the road nightly. Soooo. Chicken? Egg?
I read that too, but then talked to someone who lives in town, and they said that they havent closed the entire freeway every night... theyve been letting the terrorists protest on a section of convertible lanes, but they don't close the entire highway with the shit. idk
I do know that right in that area there are express lanes on the I5 that are tiered so they run along the freeway, but underneath it. I know those express lanes merge back up with the I5 right in the same area where the accident happened, but I can't remember exactly where.
IF the terrorists were allowed to protest in the express lanes, those are reversible lanes. AM they go one way. PM they go the other way. So they have all these barriccades they use to close the lanes as they're switching directions.
Prolly what happened is they closed both northbound and southbound barricades to keep people off the express lanes. But I know of two places where you can go around the barricade if you pull an illegal move, and people sometimes do it.
So the idea that the cops think just because the barriccades are up that means the terrorists are safe from the cars is asinine. Its like they don't know the shortcuts in their own city.
Your explanation makes sense, why they're allowed to be there in the first place still doesn't.
Like CHAZ discovered an area of Seattle that the mayor abandoned?
The important thing is they were protesting safely by wearing a glorified tissue on their face
I was thinking this exact same thing. I actually dont think I-5 was "Closed" they are just using that to try and make it look "peaceful" and not disruptive.
Agree 100%. Problem at this point is that the laws are not enforced. Communists will keep pushing the envelope as long as they can get away with it.
It's not wordplay. It's New Speak.
ME TOO.
CALL THEM WHAT THEY ARE.
DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.