Here's a question for the legal eagles: if arson, even on something like a garbage dumpster, is universally considered a felony, why doesn't the same standard apply to destruction by other means? And if the reports that the statue was "set on fire" are accurate, why has no one been arrested for felony arson?
Here's a question for the legal eagles: if arson, even on something like a garbage dumpster, is universally considered a felony, why doesn't the same standard apply to destruction by other means? And if the reports that the statue was "set on fire" are accurate, why has no one been arrested for felony arson?
Because they spit on the rule of law over there.