Unless they’ve got him going to the island, it doesn’t matter from a responsible journalist’s perspective that he had a one acre lot on a public island next to pedo island. There needs to be a more compelling connection than just “Oh look these islands are next to each other”
Normally I would agree with you, however in every article and every video about Epstein, they make sure to mention the fact that Epstein visited Mar-a-lago a few times. They also fail to mention that Trump kicked him out of Mar-a-lago. It would seem logical to me that the Mar-a-lago information is as relevant as Biden's Island in this case. If they mention one they should mention the other.
They mentioned all kinds of irrelevant points in the article, this definitely could have been included according to the standard of how they wrote this article
Is this the property next to pedo island?
Unless they’ve got him going to the island, it doesn’t matter from a responsible journalist’s perspective that he had a one acre lot on a public island next to pedo island. There needs to be a more compelling connection than just “Oh look these islands are next to each other”
Normally I would agree with you, however in every article and every video about Epstein, they make sure to mention the fact that Epstein visited Mar-a-lago a few times. They also fail to mention that Trump kicked him out of Mar-a-lago. It would seem logical to me that the Mar-a-lago information is as relevant as Biden's Island in this case. If they mention one they should mention the other.
Your argument:
“They lie and misrepresent things so we should too.”
Don’t be a fucking idiot.
That would assume they weren’t hopelessly biased to begin with (they are.)
They mentioned all kinds of irrelevant points in the article, this definitely could have been included according to the standard of how they wrote this article
Epstein voted by mail