4878
Comments (466)
sorted by:
700
Phouglas 700 points ago +703 / -3

“We knew”?

Seriously what in the holy hell

402
H1ddenAg3nda 402 points ago +402 / -0

exactly. Whose "we". How did they know? Who told them? If you are going to drop something like that start naming names...

304
WinWithMe 304 points ago +305 / -1

"We" is probably Pao and Spez at least, and they knew because they were probably part of it

265
Snake 265 points ago +265 / -0

2 years later they killed Aaron Swartz

103
deleted 103 points ago +103 / -0
61
FreeBased1 61 points ago +61 / -0

"We Knew"

If dumbass bitch Ellen Pao from Reddit knew about it, you better believe a whole bunch of other people knew.

I don't even mean people online, throwing out 'conspiracy theories'; I mean people in big business, politics, media, etc. who KNEW. Not some theory or rumor... THEY FUCKING KNEW.

How many HUNDREDS or THOUSANDS of people literally KNEW about Epstein and Gislane Maxwell and whoever else was involved? These are some sick fuckers, and anyone who knew about it is a sick fuck, too.

What's wrong with these people? "Oh, yeah, like, I'm at this party and like, that guy over there, yeah he jacks off on plants. And like, that lady over there, she finds GIRLS and flies them to a totally private island on her helicopter, so, like, rich people and politicians can have sex with the GIRLS. Like.. Derp."

How is that "normal" for these people?

24
DL535 24 points ago +24 / -0

Exactly. I'm not sure if Pao even understands what kind of hot water she just jumped into with that statement. It begs all KINDS of awkward questions.

Like IF YOU KNEW ABOUT THIS WHY DIDN'T YOU PASS THAT ALONG TO LAW ENFORCEMENT?

And WHY DID YOUR POS WEBSITE TRY TO COVER UP PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT IT?

Bitch.

13
ClownTamer 13 points ago +13 / -0

The context of it makes it worse. They’re acting like BLM is something the entire site needs to jump behind immediately and are purging things that disagree. Meanwhile, they knew and continue to know about actual sex traffickers of underaged girls and were like “That’s, like, kinda wrong. I’m not sitting at the same table as them, but they can still come to my party. They only get 5 drinks though! No open bar for them.”

8
thegeebeebee 8 points ago +8 / -0

Trump knew and went to law enforcement.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
0
RedditIs4Retards 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ricky Gervais knew and let it out at Golden Globes in a form of comedy.

Watch Tom Hanks face. He's guilty as fuck. He's been accused by a 13 year old of renting her from her parents and she currently has charges against her own parents (@saraashcraft)

Go take a look at Tom Hanks intstagram... Creepy as fuck.

84
Prometheus76 84 points ago +84 / -0

Pretty deep dive into the Aaron Swartz story here: Was Aaron Swartz Killed By An MIT Satanic Child Porn Ring?

44
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 44 points ago +45 / -1

That was also around the same time as Jerry Sandusky.

14
PeruvianNeckTie 14 points ago +14 / -0

👀 bruh The hell did I just read? I hate that people still look at me cross-eyed when I bring up the fact that pedos run the world...

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
PeruvianNeckTie 6 points ago +6 / -0

Word, I appreciate the disclaimer!

3
ShitComment 3 points ago +3 / -0

The for sharing

2
TrumpysaurusRex 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh my God! Wow that is a really in depth article. I hope people in the justice dept know about all this!

1
Dartsky 1 point ago +2 / -1

Muh joooooooooos

170
deleted 170 points ago +170 / -0
69
Mashiki 69 points ago +69 / -0

Somethingsomething about conspiracy theories ending up being true once again.

18
xBigCoffinHunter 18 points ago +18 / -0

I used to believe Alex Jones was entertaining but a little nuts.

20
eldodroptop1 20 points ago +20 / -0

Alex Jones is entertaining, more than a little nuts, and absolutely correct about these sick fucks.

3
MegaMagaManX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Basically my go to response whenever I bring him up

2
thegeebeebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

They excruciated Alex for citing a study even Berkeley found credible and worth talking about.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
56
Keiichi81 56 points ago +56 / -0

'Member when that crazy Pizzagate-believing actor (seriously) wandered into Comet Pingpong with a rifle and fired a single shot that just so happened to completely obliterate their computer hard disk, and also gave the leftists in Silicon Valley an excuse to ban all mention of Pizzagate as a "dangerous conspiracy"? What a coincidence.

6
DL535 6 points ago +6 / -0

crazy Pizzagate-believing actor

not crazy deep state employee who was instructed to imitate a pizzagate believer on social media before carrying out his assignment

FTFY

20
Robert 20 points ago +20 / -0

Spez knew and still chose to do everything he's done, and gaslight literally all of reddit.

Tarring and feathering needs to be brought back, kek.

5
JesusisKing 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was strait fire and the most exciting development of the times while it was up. So many live new finds that are staples of the topic now. All pre-Q. There are patriots out there who will fight.

133
chopz 133 points ago +135 / -2

And that's why reddit likes rape porn and allows the subreddits to exist. They're helpers in this.

68
deleted 68 points ago +68 / -0
37
AlphaNathan 37 points ago +38 / -1

Spez really is a pedophile cannibal.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
37
tombombadil 37 points ago +39 / -2

Reddit’s owes almost all of its early success to child pornography. For years their most active subreddit was /r/jailbait, and the only reason the admins deleted it was because the media ran a major hit piece against reddit.

-5
Telperion -5 points ago +3 / -8

Caving on /r/jailbait was the top of the slippery slope that got Reddit into the hellscape it is today. Hold your ground against performative outrage mobs, moral panics and media sharks, or you belong to them forever.

4
tombombadil 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. No it wasn’t.

We are against censorship. We are not pro-illegal activity. There is a huge difference between banning a /r/jailbait, and banning subs like /r/fatpeoplehate and /r/watchpeopledie. The latter two were banned because people found them offensive, /r/jailbait was banned because it was illegal.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
1
Telperion 1 point ago +1 / -0

... What about it?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Telperion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah.

97
deleted 97 points ago +97 / -0
65
Lady_MaGa 65 points ago +66 / -1

Our beloved Trump.

30
BeefyBelisarius 30 points ago +30 / -0

Because you can't take drunken compromising pictures in a back room of a party of a guy who doesn't drink. That's why there was such a huge freakout when he won.

And that's also why fighting trafficking has been such a yuge priority for our president. Everyone in upper class social circles knows, but ones with power are generally compromised to protect the international pedo racket.

9
DL535 9 points ago +9 / -0

It was reported that after the election when DJT realized the full extent of pedo blackmail in DC, even with everything he already knew about it from operating in NYC, he was shocked and said something like "DC is pedo central"

6
thegeebeebee 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look up "Filegate" - Clinton's stole the FBI background check dossiers on hundreds of people so they could be blackmailed.

They then let China steal the OPM database with hundreds of thousands dossiers. All our spies in China were slaughtered.

We are at war.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
31
Fatbob2020 31 points ago +31 / -0

If Joepa carried the burden of guilt for Sandusky, then all of these people deserve to be destroyed. This is what America should be protesting in the streets about!

3
CharlesHalloway 3 points ago +4 / -1

JoePa deserves blame as well. No way that bastard didn't know what was going on all those years. He wasn't some doddering old man barely cognizant of what was going on around him. Dude ran Happy Valley and nothing happened without his say so.

He didn't rape and molest kids like Sandusky did. But he did allow it to happen and did pretty much nothing about it.

1
Fatbob2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh i agree. i’m saying the MSM isn’t roasting these people ( the “we” she mentions)like they should be!

16
deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1
7
westrock2000 7 points ago +7 / -0

He who shall not be named on Reddit?

12
meals23 12 points ago +12 / -0

Eric Ciaramella?

12
Former_RM2 12 points ago +12 / -0

Dollars to donuts someone involved with the impeachment and/or Russia Gate is involved with this shit. Likely multiple someones. Comey looks like a pedo to me.Brennan is a Muslim, so he's automatically suspect.

65
vote_for_MAGA_2020 65 points ago +65 / -0

Can they now be charged with a crime? How do you know about underage girls being trafficked for sex and not report it? That’s a fucking crime!!!!!

36
Fourtyandfourtyfive 36 points ago +36 / -0

It feels like R.I.C.O would apply and trickle down to any knowingly involved.

I’m no lawyer but knowing of pedo-sex trade is going on during cocktail hour... Drag everyone involved in, on CNN. Make em sweat. Turn them on each other.

23
NorthAfricanViolet 23 points ago +23 / -0

...on CNN

How do you drag someone in, while they are broadcasting themselves being dragged in?

14
Fourtyandfourtyfive 14 points ago +14 / -0

I mean do them like Rodger Stone.

If you mean how does someone film themselves, change CNN to OAN.

7
lion_streezus 7 points ago +7 / -0

We can start running their equipment for them ...

17
vote_for_MAGA_2020 17 points ago +17 / -0

Not gonna happen. That freak Jeffrey star admitted to knowing about some stupid rock star dude who was banging underage chicks and saying nothing about that. No penalty for that freak. Won’t be any here either.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
14
duergerprince 14 points ago +14 / -0

Who would they report it to? Every person in power, with the exception of Trump and Pence, is involved in one random illegal trade or another

3
Pedeville 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shes in charge of the third largest social media site, yeah sure she cant bring this to light somehow and make the people demand investigations

5
ignorant_slob 5 points ago +5 / -0

Someone wanted G-Max at the party

64
SquiggyMcPepe 64 points ago +64 / -0

Well they just put themselves on the arkancide list.. I have a feeling now that maxwell is in custody and alive the dead bodies are about to start piling up as the high ranking pedos cut out loose ends.

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
11
Fourtyandfourtyfive 11 points ago +11 / -0

That website is a lot like the Clintons history.

Lots of dead links.

17
TruthyBrat 17 points ago +17 / -0

That’s why they want to kill Archive.org and The Wayback Machine.

5
MegaMagaManX 5 points ago +5 / -0

If they get their demands, it will be very bad!

They claim it's because of copyrights or whatever BS. Most average folks probably have no idea about theses archive sites, let alone use them to obtain removed content

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
34
BladderBeerPoopin 34 points ago +35 / -1

Need a 3am no knock. Roger Stone style. Get that hottie from OAN to cover it live..

34
Shillhunter42 34 points ago +34 / -0

In large companies like these to move up the ladder people usually need to know what cliques to get in with, what questions to ask, what questions not to ask to keep your career. That can often mean people knowing open secrets and unfortunately keeping their mouths closed.

It seems some people are wondering why no one would come out about things they know, just have a convo with Snowden to understand how whistleblowers end up in this world. Then look at Seth Rich. Now imagine being a whistleblower without evidence.

Not condoning any of this bullshit but, it's crucial for people to understand how these things happen seemingly in the open with so many people knowing about. The more people willing to fight in organizations for what is right the easier it becomes to create change and clean house.

11
Ophelia 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's like those movie where someone tries to tell the Authorities but no on believes them or they're all in cahoots anyway.

32
Long_time_lurker 32 points ago +32 / -0

Well, in 2011, Epstein had been convicted some years prior and he got a ridiculous deal. Dunno how much was known of Ghislane, though...

21
the-new-style 21 points ago +22 / -1

This is the guy who funded Jeff's failed defence for his 2005 arrest / 2008 conviction

https://www.reddit.com/r/stevenpinker/

Pinker is Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at Harvard University
before that he was at MIT from 1982
He left as the director of the Center for Cognitive neuroscience in 1999

MIT and Harvard were still getting multi million Epstein donations

https://www.wbur.org/edify/2020/01/20/mit-jeffrey-epstein-gifts-report-fallout

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/07/11/harvard-has-no-plans-return-jeffrey-epsteins-6-5-m-gift/1702047001/

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
Long_time_lurker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahh, speaking of the MIT Media lab / Minsky, I wonder if this is connected at all?

http://archive.is/wip/3WQTE

Singh worked at the MIT Media lab and thanked Epstein in the acknowledgements of one of his papers.

139
hisnamewasjeff 139 points ago +140 / -1

And this is Ellen Fucking Pao

She's virtually a nobody in the real world

If fucking Pao knew about this

What does Hillary know? What do the actual celebrities know??

How fucking deep does this go?

53
russianbot4673 53 points ago +59 / -6

epstein was first arrested around 15yrs ago and articles were written about it. maxwell was probably written about for her connections to him as well. the party ellen mentioned was 2011 so well after the first epstein arrest. this doesn't imply some kind of secret knowledge. think, people.

46
deleted 46 points ago +47 / -1
24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
4
ScullyMully 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, this was Kleiner Perkins, and by 2011 Pao wanted revenge

(Pao) had started working at Kleiner Perkins in 2005, as John Doerr’s chief of staff. It was a prestigious position within a prestigious firm. As his chief of staff, Pao worked very closely with Doerr. “He was her mentor,” says a friend. And he trusted her with everything from writing his speeches and articles to his correspondence. He was said to be very fond of her, even if other partners were not. Indeed, it was Doerr who had recommended her as a Crown Fellow.

While in Germany, Pao alleges that Ajit Nazre, a married co-worker, who at the time was not senior to her, had made “inappropriate sexual approaches,” which she had “rebuffed.” But Nazre had refused to take no for an answer, she claimed. On their return to California, he had continued to pressure Pao for sex. He “falsely told her that his wife had left him” and “engaged in offensive, obstructionist, and difficult behavior.” At some point, Pao “succumbed” to Nazre’s “insistence on sexual relations.” In her lawsuit, she says this happened “on two or three occasions,” before she ended their relationship in October. Which is when Nazre, who has since left the firm, began to “retaliate” against her.

she finally complained to John Doerr—not only about Nazre but also about “inappropriate” behavior by Randy Komisar, a senior partner.

Doerr being a legendary venture capital investor

But Kleiner Perkins says that this conversation never occurred. The first and last time that Pao ever mentioned Ajit Nazre, Kleiner says, was shortly after she had broken up with him, and then it was to report that she’d had a relationship with him, and it was over.

As to Komisar and Book of Longing—which for many women would rank close to the top of the creepy-boss gift list—Kleiner says that Komisar’s wife bought it for Pao. The reason: Pao had given Komisar a Buddha statue as a holiday gift, and he felt obliged to reciprocate, apparently on Valentine’s Day. Why that book? According to the firm, Komisar is a Buddhist; he and Pao had discussed Buddhism; Cohen had written the book after a five-year stint at a Buddhist monastery. And John Doerr’s reaction to Pao’s account of Komisar’s alleged steamy come-on? Kleiner Perkins says that Pao never mentioned it to him.

In August 2010 Ellen Pao received a lukewarm annual performance review from Kleiner’s partners. It noted her problems with other partners, and urged her to focus more on her interpersonal skills. She claimed the review was “spearheaded” by Randy Komisar, the partner who had given her Book of Longing and snared the RPX board seat. According to Kleiner, Pao had specifically asked to have Komisar on her job-review team.

Whoever is right, by December 2010, Pao had serious problems. According to Pao, members of RPX’s board had complained to her about Komisar. She, in turn, relayed those complaints to other top Kleiner partners. If she had hoped this would get her the seat on RPX’s board she had so wanted, she was wrong. In January 2011, she was removed from the RPX relationship completely.

How totally humiliating,” says one high-ranking woman in Silicon Valley, describing it as a professional slap that would have made anyone angry. Within months, RPX would go public, generating not only millions in profits for Kleiner but also recognition for the Kleiner team that worked with the company. Which Pao missed out on. For Kleiner, Pao’s power play against a senior partner appears to have been an example of her problems as a team player. These are referred to in the stinging June 2011 review of her performance that Kleiner submitted to the court, in which Pao was described as “passive,” a partner who had a “sense of entitlement,” who was “territorial,” and was not trusted by others

15
EagleI 15 points ago +15 / -0

Weinstein but worse. Hollywood all knew and it came out big time. Now we're seeing round 2.

8
CQVFEFE 8 points ago +8 / -0

How fucking deep does this go?

So deep, it's deliberately calculated to make people sneer, "Oh, that's just a crazy cospiracy theory" when you tell them how deep it goes and what they are doing and who it is doing it

2
ignorant_slob 2 points ago +2 / -0

A salesperson let’s people know what they are selling. If they were selling girls then everyone knew.

71
34
Ophelia 34 points ago +34 / -0

Why would she ever admit this on twitter in the first place? I don't get it

40
JohnBrownsBody 40 points ago +41 / -1

Probably because of how damn disconnected from the world she is. I would willingly chock it up to an elitist stupidity.

17
AlphaNathan 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is exactly it. Normalization comes back to bite someone.

22
ignorant_slob 22 points ago +22 / -0

She thought that being complicit in child trafficking was going to make her look good because she wasn’t doing it herself.

21
Yogapede 21 points ago +21 / -0

They have an instinct to show off how “well connected” they are and how “in the know” they are

4
AlphaNathan 4 points ago +4 / -0

This too

4
knightofday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bingo

4
brimshae 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hubris.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
ScullyMully 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Reformed VC and lawyer"

Ie, her ass got fired

37
Teasingpenguin 37 points ago +37 / -0

Holy shit, that’s actually a big deal She admitted knowing and is trying to damage control it and lock account as others have archived and shown

14
BeefyBelisarius 14 points ago +14 / -0

Everyone in upper class social circles knew. One guy decided to do something about it.

6
wethedownvoted 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ellen Pao rates herself morally superior to the President, and yet Trump is the one that did something about it -- not her.

25
DJTrump_MD 25 points ago +26 / -1

Look, these people support infanticide. WTF do they care if an underage girl is molested, raped, or killed.

It’s all about the POWER

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
BTFO 9 points ago +9 / -0

Indeed. From a Christianity level, they are the opposite of Christian belief/Christ. This is evil versus good. Spiritual battle. They don't believe in God, they don't believe in Jesus Christ... they are their own God's. They are the walking epitome of Satan's minions. All they care about are themselves, power, money. They would a million times over look the other way when they see young girls being trafficked/raped/killed if it means they could continue gaining power/fame/money. They have no moral compass. This is the Left. These are the Progressives. This is the Democrat Party.

Now ask yourself... do you want that running our country?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
ScullyMully 3 points ago +3 / -0

If a society doesn't care that a nine-month-old child can legally be killed in the birth canal, rather than be allowed to be born alive, that society won't care about children being exploited for the sick kicks of evil people

223
zebfross 223 points ago +224 / -1

Wait, what the fuck? I mean it was obviously an open secret, but who would admit to knowing about it?

186
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 186 points ago +186 / -0

The same woman that admitted everything on Reddit is fake after they fired her.

42
helenvsgladys 42 points ago +42 / -0

I would like to know more.

16
debacle 16 points ago +16 / -0

Find Yishan's reddit account (I think it's u/yishan) and look at some of his most upvoted comments.

The amount of bullshit PR that reddit spits out vs what's happening behind the curtain is stark.

tl;dr: They don't care about anything unless it costs or makes them money.

76
tchouk 76 points ago +77 / -1

Chairwoman Pao is really stupid

44
womp-womp-twice 44 points ago +44 / -0

Chairman Pao

goes quicker off the tonge, gets you the additional insult of sexism from her ilks, and therefore even better fitting 😉

and might I add, it is also is closer to the original mass-murdering name-bearer, which is where her taste of censorship comes from

11
tchouk 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, but since communists are really big on really shallow displays of virtue that cost nothing, I feel like chairwoman would be more authentic.

4
rootGoose 4 points ago +4 / -0

If someone objects on the basis of sexism, tell them this:

https://thedonald.win/p/GISedmD5/the-hacker-4chan-strikes-again/c/

3
Lelleck 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Spanish crowd would call it Masculino generico.

The generic masculinum.

71
dontUseVinegerAsLube 71 points ago +72 / -1

McCain's wife said the same shit too - they all knew.

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
21
Adhal 21 points ago +21 / -0

guessing Romney and Bush will pop up as well

21
EagleI 21 points ago +21 / -0

I don't care what letter is beside their name. If they were involved, I hope a jury fries them.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
Boone13 2 points ago +2 / -0

What list?

1
boomboomnrg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 4 points ago +4 / -0

McCain married his mistress he was cheating on his wife with, a wife who stayed by him during his time as a POW. The mistress, Cindy Lou Hensley, was the daughter of Jim Hensley, who worked in partnership with Edgar Bronfman for well known mobster Meyer Lansky in Arizona during Prohibition smuggling booze and all kinds of other things across the Arizona/Mexico border. McCain used the Hensley family fortune earned from these trafficking crimes to fund his run for office.

Edgar Bronfman’s name might be familiar to you because his daughter Claire, heiress to the Seagrams liquor fortune, recently made headlines as being one of the ringleaders of the NXIVM sex cult along with Keith Raniere. This cult was busted in Mexico for child sex slave trafficking and involved several young actresses like Alison Mack from the TV show Smallville. They were known for branding the members of the sex cult with a mark in the shape of their intitials. Claire Bronfman was reported to have passed out in court when it was revealed that Michael Avenatti was one of her lawyers. Michael Avenatti infamously represented porn whore Stormy Daniels, who claimed to have had sex with President Trump while he was married. It was discovered that a few years ago, Stormy Daniels had tweeted that she thought she had just joined a cult, and a brand similar to the NXIVM brand was covered up by one of her hideous tattoos.

It’s clear why McCain was so dead set against Trump. The world is run by a huge cult like cabal that traffics children as sex slaves and feeds off harming the innocent for their own benefit.

34
TheKeagleciser 34 points ago +34 / -0

Her thirst for power and money was greater then her empathy for underaged sex victims.

But shes on the good guys sides.

12
MrBabySpam 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yet they shake their finger at you all day crying racist/sexist/blablabla

14
Teasingpenguin 14 points ago +14 / -0

Holy shit, that’s actually a big deal She admitted knowing and is trying to damage control it and lock account as others have archived and shown

180
deleted 180 points ago +181 / -1
59
FuckReddit4545 59 points ago +59 / -0

I'm ok with whatever takes down r/shithole

9
RexCollumSilvarum 9 points ago +10 / -1

By that nickname, you mean the whole site, right?

3
FuckReddit4545 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes

51
HeavenPiercingMan 51 points ago +51 / -0

And after Reddit, she went to tech companies to preach about the dangers of "incel virgin nerds" (read: the genius tech geeks doing actual work in the tech field) being "rapist nazi trumpers" and that they had to track their potential lack of sexual activity to fire them all because if so they'd be time bombs like the Rodge.

10
Mexicola1976 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is the Rodge, the Supreme Gentleman?

1
HeavenPiercingMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

The one and only. You can't Dodge the Rodge!

28
ProudWhiteMan 28 points ago +28 / -0

I like the theory that she went to reddit to promote all the shitty changes spez didn't want to do and be the unpopular face. Then of course spez the cannibal never retracted any of it and build on it and the dummies at reddit lauded him for ending Pao reign of censorship and banning subreddits

2
2Fangz 2 points ago +2 / -0

aka New Coke

10
1776er 10 points ago +10 / -0

Pao was a phenomenal interim CEO for Reddit. She came, implemented a bunch of extremely unpopular policies that reddit had been wanting to for some time, and then left. Everyone was so happy to see her gone nobody cared about the policies anymore

6
whocaresguy420 6 points ago +6 / -0

Scarmucci method in a way

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
1776er 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean you start off by saying you don't quite believe the theory but everything you said after supports the theory. She comes in, reddit makes big algo changes and entices big companies to shill for ads, and then she leaves, taking all the blame with her. Nothing went back to the way it was after she left.

Also I disagree that the site ever resembled T_D, that place was very special from the outset. You would see honest comments sometimes, but the site always held a left slant. It just accelerated when bad actors realized that many people were using reddit as a main source of information that the leftism accelerated

133
mivvan 133 points ago +133 / -0

Ellen Pao might try to hide this damning tweet now from the public.

https://archive.is/K48i5

Maybe she thought "20 retweets is not too many", maybe I can delete this before there is proof I said it.

But she would be wrong about that

https://archive.is/K48i5

60
UpTrump 60 points ago +60 / -0

Lol at her trying to do damage control

29
mivvan 29 points ago +29 / -0

Did she already delete the tweet? At the time of the last archive creation about 10 minutes ago it was still up.

43
MsAnthropic 43 points ago +43 / -0

She’s locked her account 😂😂

25
Click 25 points ago +25 / -0

Doesn't make a difference to me, since she blocked me for calling her out for wanting to ban President Trump on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/C_L_I_C_K/status/1179165542919409670

5
UpTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Idk I was looking at the archive link

-18
russianbot4673 -18 points ago +8 / -26

but what she is saying here is true. epstein was first arrested something around 15years ago and his connections to MG were widely reported as was his arrest and what it was for. sure it might've been a bit suppressed but the info was out there. it doesn't imply secret knowledge that pao said that, talking about a party in 2011, well after epstein's first arrest.

20
Dereliction 20 points ago +20 / -0

How does it make the scenario any better?

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

ugh. jesus christ i really shouldn't have to explain this. people are accusing her of having apparently been in epstein's 'ring' or whatever, because she said 'we all knew' in 2011. however the shit epstein was up to was already known because he was arrested somewhere around 2005. and Ghislain's connections to epstein and i'm pretty sure even her involvement was widely reported/hinted at.

so for pao to say 'we all knew' doesn't prove she had intimate knowledge. and if we're going to take one part of her tweet at her word, why not the part where she's being critical of the party organizer for inviting MG? i get that you don't like pao but you don't have to put on a tin foil hat and start making connections that aren't proven or even hinted at by her posts to try to smear her as having connections to a pedo. you might as well be out there telling people about adrenochrome (which came from a movie and isn't real).

1
Dereliction 1 point ago +1 / -0

so for pao to say 'we all knew' doesn't prove she had intimate knowledge.

No one but you is claiming this. No one is making connections between Pao and Ghislane over this. No one is claiming she had secret knowledge. None of that is in question or the issue.

In fact, you seem incapable of recognizing why this is receiving criticism, given your repeated (repeated) defense of Pao and her tweet.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

uh yes, people are in fact claiming this. all over the thread. 100%, several people are definitely claiming this. they're saying 'how did she know' implying she had inside info and was a member of 'the group'. there are also people saying 'if she knew why didn't she report it' as if the info she had came from anywhere else besides maybe some articles which were publicly available to everyone, or rumors.

you are absolutely 100% incorrect in this matter. it's all over the thread and i've gone back and forth with numerous people who clearly think she had personal first hand information about maxwell ghislaine. not sure which fucking thread you're looking at here, jackass.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

there's even another thread which is one of the top listed ones under 'hot' right now, with this heading: Ellen Pao (former CEO of Reddit) tweeted that she knew Ghislaine Maxwell was supplying underage sex trafficking victims as far back as 2011. Reddit banned discussion of #pizzagate and #pedogate. Reddit is complicit in knowingly covering up underage sex crimes and trafficking.

that absolutely 100% implies that ellen pao KNEW something she could only know if she was involved. you fucking moron. if you want to correct me at least put some effort into it. don't be denying that everyone here isn't saying what they clearly are saying. 'as far back as' is implying that somehow that knowledge was sinister. and it was clearly posted by someone who apparently had no idea that epstein's 2019 arrest was NOT HIS FIRST ARREST. it's so plainly obvious that a ton of people have no idea about epstein's actual history or his first arrest for this stuff which was 15 years ago and was widely reported on (just not so much across mainstream media). this stuff was public knowledge. but oh no! someone 'knew about it AS FAR BACK as 2011' GASP! alert the fbi!

4
Donarudo_Taranpu 4 points ago +4 / -0

So what?

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

so what? her saying she knew about something which was already widely known and reported for years doesn't implicate her of having secret, criminal, inside knowledge is so what. guess you need an IQ of at least 80 to get that one. my apologies.

1
Donarudo_Taranpu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but it makes her complicit. She knew and she didn't say or do anything about it.

I guess you need an IQ above room temperature to get that.

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

dude what the fuck are you smoking? thousands of people 'knew' because they read the same articles that she herself may have read, you fucking retard. it was PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE. epstein was arrested for this shit in 2005. god fucking damg, what is wrong with you. jesus christ you are demented.

1
Donarudo_Taranpu 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound upset.

Shilling is harder than you thought, huh fag?

12
Rattamahatta 12 points ago +12 / -0

Maxwell:

To be clear, the press had described her as supplying underage girls for sex, but she had not been charged so I guess it would be more accurate to say we "suspected" v "knew"

But she was still ok with her being in their presence... Same with Polanski, Epstein.

5
Mynamesprivate 5 points ago +5 / -0

Saved the screenshot here, screenshotted the archive where she tried clarifying

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
105
2222p [S] 105 points ago +105 / -0

SHE MADE HER ENTIRE TWITTER ACCOUNT PRIVATE!

https://archive.is/NSCNI

51
mivvan 51 points ago +51 / -0

not before there were MULTIPLE archives made of her tweet

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-42
russianbot4673 -42 points ago +7 / -49

her tweet where she mentioned 'knowing' something that was widely reported years before the 2011 party? what's the big deal? epstein was arrested years before that and his connection to MG was widely known/reported. you people are making something out of nothing here, imo.

update- oh look, 42 people apparently had no idea about epstein until he was arrested just last year, so they think anyone who knew anything about him or the people connected to him must have been 'in on it'. well, I knew, because i read several well written articles going into his background and the accusations against him, clear back in the late 2000s. guess that means i was in on it also? fucking morons. i get that you have a hate-on for anyone connected with reddit, but tying her in with epstein just because she was at a party with MG (so was trump and a lot of people who are surely innocent.. hundreds of people go to these parties) and said she 'knew about' her, is just gross.

36
dontCensorMeBro 36 points ago +36 / -0

something out of nothing?
Publicly admitting her KNOWING of specific people trafficking minors and not having reported it to the police, doesn't that make her complicit?

9
Grief 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, 100%

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

did you even read my post? are you even aware, at all, that epstein was actually first arrested for this stuff FIFTEEN YEARS AGO? he got a slap on the wrist was was labelled a sexual predator. the whole thing WAS reported by several outlets, and people had even written digging into his history. his connections with maxwell ghislain were widely known, and her involvement with his criminal activity was at least hinted at by media that was out there. so no, dipshit, pao saying that 'she knew' something that was floating around and talked about in various articles, and probably was rumored all over NY and various other places, does absolutely not make her complicit. it's not hard to understand.

26
Dereliction 26 points ago +27 / -1

Do you commonly go to parties with "suspected" child sex traffickers and just /shrug and say, "What's the big deal?"

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

that's not the issue here. i'm not saying that isn't kind of gross. but the issue is whether she has confessed to something criminal. and the answer is no. she said 'we all knew', but again, this stuff had already been reported after he was arrested the first time, nearly 15yrs ago. i actually read about it in the mid to late 2000s. most people hadn't by then, but the info was out there and epstein was already classified as a sexual predator. so saying you 'knew about it' in 2011 does not prove you were in his secret club. i'd just like to see more people use their brains rather than parrot and spread misinfo, but do what you gotta do.

6
Grief 6 points ago +6 / -0

So she didn't know, she heard the rumors. Her tweet specifically says she knows about her illegal behavior. There is no misreading that. She may have used the wrong words but she definitely admitted to knowing a crime was committed and didn't say anything about it.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

i don't know man. i get that everyone here has a hate-on for pao so you're all going to just jump to any fucking retarded conclusion you want. go for it. it's not going to get you anywhere though. so she said knew instead of suspected. i'm sure 'they're' setting up grand juries for her as we speak.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

i mean that's like saying that anyone who has said they 'knew' OJ killed nicole brown simpson must have been there with him when he did it because he wasn't actually found guilty, so only someone who was there could KNOW he did it for sure. that's the kind of logic you're using right now. it's shit.

2
Fremium2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

The troll accounts that broke character to post that is when you know that she done fucked up.

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

me? i'm just a guy who doesn't like when idiots like you who happen to vote for the same president as i do, spread retarded misinfo like this.

again dum dum, and i know you'll ignore every point i posted AGAIN, EPSTEIN WAS FUCKING ARRESTED FOR THIS SHIT IN 2005. CAN YOU READ? DO YOU COMPREHEND ENGLISH? it was widely known and reported, as well as MG's connections to him and possible/probable involvement in his crimes. i'm sure it was also widely rumored among the upper class that was even remotely close to his circles.

but hey if you wanna be a good little boy and do the popular thing of brainlessly parroting what everyone else here is going along with, without using your brain (if you even have one), and in the end making us look like idiots because the thing you're spreading is easily refutable, go ahead, be my guest. why don't you start a thread about this 'adrenochrome' stuff you just heard about, next?

-1
Fremium2020 -1 points ago +1 / -2

you people are making something out of nothing here

I is tha smarter than all of yousz!! You should jutsz lets dis go!

Cool story, bro.

0
russianbot4673 0 points ago +1 / -1

look at the smart guy, not addressing any of my points. what a smart guy you are, bro.

-1
Fremium2020 -1 points ago +1 / -2

You think we need to not care because "aww shucks everyone already knows this!".

As if everyone is like you digesting every minute of this story daily.

So go fuck off. Your "point" is retarded.

0
IcyHue 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're right. I was also like "wtf? She covered it up!" without thinking about the timeline.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
2
Donarudo_Taranpu 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't remember any actual bullying, but I do remember there being a lot of accusations of being bullied. That was fake too, wasn't it? I don't know how awake I was at that time.

13
sideOfBeef2016 13 points ago +13 / -0

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
10
Click 10 points ago +10 / -0

She eventually realized just how much shit she's gonna be in for saying something like that on Twitter.

What a fucking moron.

82
deleted 82 points ago +83 / -1
-31
russianbot4673 -31 points ago +5 / -36

maybe she just read about it, after epstein was arrested around 15yrs ago, the first time, and his connections with MG was reported and well known. i don't see how pao saying this proves anything, and i think some of you are looking kind of crazy here, jumping to conclusions when epstein was talked about back then. just not by everyone, like in the past year or so. but it was known.

21
honeymussie 21 points ago +21 / -0

While it's true he had all ready been arrested you spamming it over and over again makes you look like a shill. Also she had not been charged so technically she was not "involved" but if a bunch of higher ups knew she was and didn't do anything about it then that makes them all enablers.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
2
mintscape 2 points ago +2 / -0

To me they not only look like a shill but like a pedo. They are all through this thread trying to play down knowing about child sex trafficking.

2
honeymussie 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know, jesus. If you have a point to make do it once in a thread like a reasonable person. To respond over and over again with the same message is what you do when you know you have an unpopular opinion that will likely get down voted. I guess the shills think if they do it enough one at least one will stick and no one will notice but someone always notices.

-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

it might make me look like a shill but i just don't like seeing people spread misinfo. your 'also' doesn't make sense because it ignores everything i said. not only had he been arrested, but his arrest had been reported, in detail, by at least a couple of outlets. his connection to maxwell ghislain had been reported as well, and i believe her role in epstein's crimes had at least been hinted at.

if someone here posts about adrenochrome and a bunch of retards just go along with it, i'll post multiple times responding to them about how it came from a johnny depp movie, too. it's what i do. people need to use their brains once in a while.

69
deleted 69 points ago +69 / -0
61
Gold-Eyed-Cat 61 points ago +61 / -0

THEY ALL KNEW.

They knew kids were getting raped and they were like, "OMG I am invited to the rapists cult party! Squeeeee!"

16
lacker101 16 points ago +16 / -0

Always about money. Justice and integrity be damned. You want funding in the neo-corporate world? Want access to the High Finance club?

Kneel to the Altar.

51
Lurking-My-Life-Away 51 points ago +51 / -0

We are proactively controlled by pedophiles at the highest levels of government, media, and corporations.

15
lacker101 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's the only way you can realistically practice your wants. Be the inquisitor/gatekeeper/Judge. Pizzagate had alot of autism in it. But clearly years later it's obvious that much of it was not wrong as the media claimed.

24
VoteCyborgTrump2040 24 points ago +24 / -0

James Alefantis is basically I love kids in French. Either we're in a simulation and the creator finds this funny, or that shit is real. He's also somehow one of the most powerful people in DC despite the fact that he's just a pizza parlor owner. How does that happen exactly?

12
repoman 12 points ago +12 / -0

Satanists love word play like this. Hearing Larry Gaiters discuss BLM is mind blowing. Goes way back. Just look at the term Thug = Thuggee

11
thuggishruggishtrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Dude is literally a Rothschild.

2
JohnBrownsBody 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've always been of the opinion that simulation doesn't matter exceedingly, as that talking point, outside the interest of physics, has always sounded like a great way to disempower we masses. We're surrounded by institutions that have been hollowed out either way.

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
5
Gunslinger1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not if they’re defunded 🤡🌎

29
p8riot 29 points ago +29 / -0

Wow. It's not just the slip of her knowing, it's her casually saying "We knew about it of course, but how about those dorks making the guest list!" as if inviting her was OBVIOUSLY a bigger offense than keeping silent about an international sex ring.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
20
kuningus 20 points ago +20 / -0

Ellen Pao knew about a child sex trafficking ring and said nothing. Isn't there some way she could be charged?

20
Killerko 20 points ago +20 / -0

Hahaha.. her tweets are protected now.. that did not take long :D

12
mivvan 12 points ago +12 / -0

We still got the archives, several of them

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
tufftoffee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bahahahahaha

19
ThurtineFiddyToo 19 points ago +19 / -0

Literally why would you be dumb enough to comment anything that could link you within ten degrees of separation to this shit?? These people are so addicted to social media and by extension social status they can't help but incriminate themselves.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
15
OneTypoComment 15 points ago +15 / -0

I was concerned about a 2nd Civil War, but now I'm seeing the absolute need for a 2nd Crusade.

3
crusadetiem 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can we call it the first crusade or is that Christopher columbusing? Either way, I’m down.

15
KILLARY4PRISON 15 points ago +15 / -0

Is she referring to Kleiner Perkins to throw shade at them? That's a spicy meatball damn...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
sineater 14 points ago +14 / -0

Pure, absolute, unadulterated fucking evil

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
NixonsDMTdealer 5 points ago +6 / -1

They jewed up his character so much. That role was matza face. Love that movie.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
NixonsDMTdealer 7 points ago +7 / -0

I miss hearing him laugh loud into the mic. I used to not like it but now when I go back and listen it makes me laugh even harder.

4
Davemustaine2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah. In the sequel he should’ve had a “again, with the alien invasion !” Type line

13
BoughtByBloomberg2 13 points ago +13 / -0

We knew and did nothing.

The things the people on this site would do to child traffickers are unspeakable.

12
VoteCyborgTrump2040 12 points ago +12 / -0

Come on now, have a heart. She had her social life and career advancement to think of. What's a little ritual child sacrifice, cannibalism, and rape every now and then gonna hurt anything? Might as well just ignore it, that's what works to my personal advantage.

11
TheRedPlanet 11 points ago +11 / -0

They all knew about Weinstein too and Bill Clinton, Spacey, Cosby....

They live in a world without absolutes.

7
lacker101 7 points ago +7 / -0

They all knew. But traded integrity/dignity for wealth/success. To be expect from those with no morals.

10
Mammoth_Actuary 10 points ago +11 / -1

Wow. The nonchalant way she says it is so disgusting

8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
8
BrickSuit 8 points ago +8 / -0

And her Twitter is now set to Private.

Doubtless she is scrubbing it all right now.

7
Tellsyouhow 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wonder who they all "know" about now.

We should continue with operation Cancel Reddit as per the posts on here a few days ago and call out their advertisers

7
rtdanon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well shit. I think spez might now be labelled as a real jerk. Can we protest in front of his house?

6
Registered 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, in Ellen's defense, the culture she comes from pretty much turns a blind eye to this happening. She just followed suit.

6
YuriBezmenov 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait, there's no way this is real.....

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
YuriBezmenov 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks comrade.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
CowForCow 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please keep this stickied for a while this is super important.

5
Registered 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here are some partners and their friends who we saw schmoozing well into the night at the Kleiner Party:

  • Former VP of the U.S. Al Gore
  • Co-founder of Sun Microsystems Bill Joy
  • Former Morgan Stanley analyst (and current Kleiner partner) Mary Meeker
  • Former Twitter engineering head Mike Abbott
  • Longtime partners John Doerr and Brook Byers and founding partner Tom Perkins
  • Bing Gordon, who joined a couple years ago and led Kleiner’s moves into gaming and social
  • Venture capitalist Vinod Khosla
  • Economist Laura Tyson
  • HP Chairman Ray Lane
  • Ex-MySpace CEO Owen Van Natta
  • Former Hulu CTO Eric Feng — his new company Erly is a Kleiner investment
  • Facebook e-commerce leader Jared Morgenstern

Source: https://www.businessinsider.com.au/boonsri-dickinson-heres-who-was-at-the-super-exclusive-kleiner-perkins-party-last-night-2011-12

5
valadin89 5 points ago +5 / -0

God damn it, /pol/ is going to be right AGAIN...

5
Crankyboy 5 points ago +5 / -0

What the fucking fuck. PEDO EVERYWHERE.

5
Vir4030 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hopefully, the FBI has seen this. We should get this to their tip line. This is practically an admission of conspiracy. Certainly, the FBI will want to ask some questions at Kleiner.

5
thunderpussy 5 points ago +5 / -0

....some people did something...

5
loveUSA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tweet archived here: https://archive.is/K48i5

:D

5
findthewarmspot 5 points ago +5 / -0

We knew and did nothing...

4
Crisatunity_knocks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Take all the heartfelt, black and white videos of celebrities talking a out me too, privilege and the rest of that shit.

Understand that RIGHT now there are OTHER as yet undisclosed Spaceys and Weinsteins still at it. AND THEY KNOW ABOUT IT.

4
Shakakka99 4 points ago +4 / -0

When your CYA tweet implicates you as an accessory to the single most heinous crime on the planet...

... and you're all nonchalant and cavalier talking about not taking "pictures" together.

4
debi_birx_scarf 4 points ago +4 / -0

So who is "WE"?

4
Mike0xquitelong 4 points ago +4 / -0

"We knew about the underaged sex slavery, but see that guy who posted 'fag' 3 years ago? Yeah, let's get him fired"

4
downwithuppish 4 points ago +4 / -0

Isn't she admitting that the so called "cool people" who invite child traffickers to parties also consider her part of that circle? She even admits its a tightly controlled guest list, which means they knew she would be trustworthy and wouldn't say anything.

Yeah, not a good look.

4
Jsa9 4 points ago +4 / -0

Alex Jones talked about this shit for decades.

It's time for the media to admit he was right.

4
1337centipede 4 points ago +4 / -0

"My twitter has become so powerful that I can actually make my enemies tell the truth." RealDonaldTrump

3
FUCK_TYLER 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cindy McCain was interviewed and she admitted that everybody knew

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
ConditionalFeels 3 points ago +3 / -0

We knew??? Who else knew? All of you are accessories!