maybe she just read about it, after epstein was arrested around 15yrs ago, the first time, and his connections with MG was reported and well known. i don't see how pao saying this proves anything, and i think some of you are looking kind of crazy here, jumping to conclusions when epstein was talked about back then. just not by everyone, like in the past year or so. but it was known.
While it's true he had all ready been arrested you spamming it over and over again makes you look like a shill. Also she had not been charged so technically she was not "involved" but if a bunch of higher ups knew she was and didn't do anything about it then that makes them all enablers.
I know, jesus. If you have a point to make do it once in a thread like a reasonable person. To respond over and over again with the same message is what you do when you know you have an unpopular opinion that will likely get down voted. I guess the shills think if they do it enough one at least one will stick and no one will notice but someone always notices.
it might make me look like a shill but i just don't like seeing people spread misinfo. your 'also' doesn't make sense because it ignores everything i said. not only had he been arrested, but his arrest had been reported, in detail, by at least a couple of outlets. his connection to maxwell ghislain had been reported as well, and i believe her role in epstein's crimes had at least been hinted at.
if someone here posts about adrenochrome and a bunch of retards just go along with it, i'll post multiple times responding to them about how it came from a johnny depp movie, too. it's what i do. people need to use their brains once in a while.
maybe she just read about it, after epstein was arrested around 15yrs ago, the first time, and his connections with MG was reported and well known. i don't see how pao saying this proves anything, and i think some of you are looking kind of crazy here, jumping to conclusions when epstein was talked about back then. just not by everyone, like in the past year or so. but it was known.
While it's true he had all ready been arrested you spamming it over and over again makes you look like a shill. Also she had not been charged so technically she was not "involved" but if a bunch of higher ups knew she was and didn't do anything about it then that makes them all enablers.
To me they not only look like a shill but like a pedo. They are all through this thread trying to play down knowing about child sex trafficking.
I know, jesus. If you have a point to make do it once in a thread like a reasonable person. To respond over and over again with the same message is what you do when you know you have an unpopular opinion that will likely get down voted. I guess the shills think if they do it enough one at least one will stick and no one will notice but someone always notices.
it might make me look like a shill but i just don't like seeing people spread misinfo. your 'also' doesn't make sense because it ignores everything i said. not only had he been arrested, but his arrest had been reported, in detail, by at least a couple of outlets. his connection to maxwell ghislain had been reported as well, and i believe her role in epstein's crimes had at least been hinted at.
if someone here posts about adrenochrome and a bunch of retards just go along with it, i'll post multiple times responding to them about how it came from a johnny depp movie, too. it's what i do. people need to use their brains once in a while.