1361
Comments (64)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-3
jiujiujiu -3 points ago +3 / -6

Your definition of traitor is tied to the legal language of treason. Mine is a less stringent definition of more or less seditious speech. Treason is providing aid and comfort to the enemy. Kind of broad language that requires extremely overt actions to lead to charges. If we are using your implied definition then Soros is not a traitor by law. I say he still is just not in a legal sense.

9
Midwestbattlebear 9 points ago +10 / -1

When you are funding a group like Antifa, which was classified a domestic terrorist group in 2017, you are funding a political overthrow of the government. Im sorry but that’s no longer freedom of speech. When you shortsale entire countries to make a profit and then send in people from other countries to rape and steal that’s not activism. You say that my definition is based in law, and play word games. I didn’t mean treason treason, I meant something else. Oh, btw. Seditious speech is still illegal.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/seditious-speech-and-seditious-libel

But hey, you do you, keep carrying water for Soros. I’m sure he appreciates it.

-4
jiujiujiu -4 points ago +2 / -6

I’m afraid that you are mistaken. If he has explicitly broken the law, that you seem so sure of, then why has he not been charged by the authorities? If you can clearly see his lawbreaking then surely the FBI can see it too and in far more detail. Shall I queue some ominous conspiracy theory music before you begin?

3
Midwestbattlebear 3 points ago +4 / -1

awww, it makes a shit argument and resorts to calling me a conspiracy theorist.

Let me know how the boot tastes. 👌