Someone was asking what if the states try to compel a National Popular Vote Compact without any formal agreement. I was responding to an implicitly legal question. Illegal motives were never brought up. It's a non issue.
I see. You see this as a non-issue because you're only concerned with the legality of it. If we've learned anything these years, is that legality in practice is a very elastic concept when it comes to things Democrats really care for. So, a non-issue?Well, yeah, if losing the election doesn't matter, sure.
You're really not listening here. I was only addressing a very specific question about enforcement. Enforcement is legal. You're going on a non-sequitur and trying to create an unnecessary argument with me. If you want to say the Democrats will throw all of the laws out the window, you don't need to argue with me to do that.
Does it matter if they do it legally or illegally, as long as they succeed?
Someone was asking what if the states try to compel a National Popular Vote Compact without any formal agreement. I was responding to an implicitly legal question. Illegal motives were never brought up. It's a non issue.
I see. You see this as a non-issue because you're only concerned with the legality of it. If we've learned anything these years, is that legality in practice is a very elastic concept when it comes to things Democrats really care for. So, a non-issue?Well, yeah, if losing the election doesn't matter, sure.
You're really not listening here. I was only addressing a very specific question about enforcement. Enforcement is legal. You're going on a non-sequitur and trying to create an unnecessary argument with me. If you want to say the Democrats will throw all of the laws out the window, you don't need to argue with me to do that.