4367 Supreme Court rules 'faithless electors' can't go rogue at Electoral College (www.yahoo.com) posted 284 days ago by meteorknife 284 days ago by meteorknife +4367 / -0 497 comments share 497 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (497) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 2 ▼ – williammcfadden 2 points 284 days ago +2 / -0 Then there could be regional confederacies against the federal government. Not gonna happen beyond college sports. It's an agreement, or a pact. That's not allowed if challenged in court. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – zippy3 1 point 281 days ago +1 / -0 Colorado is trying to give popular vote to one candidate. How did they make an agreement with another state in doing so? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – williammcfadden 2 points 281 days ago +2 / -0 The entire pact kicks in if a certain number of other states join in. Otherwise there is not one single state acting alone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – zippy3 2 points 279 days ago +2 / -0 this is pure evil permalink parent save report block reply
Then there could be regional confederacies against the federal government. Not gonna happen beyond college sports.
It's an agreement, or a pact. That's not allowed if challenged in court.
Colorado is trying to give popular vote to one candidate. How did they make an agreement with another state in doing so?
The entire pact kicks in if a certain number of other states join in. Otherwise there is not one single state acting alone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact
this is pure evil