It doesn't make sense for the constitution to specifically say each state gets X electors if it was just about state's rights. If it was about states rights, it would say each state gets X weight in their vote.
Since the constitution specifically requires people here, and allows each one to vote different than the others, it would seem to imply they should be able to make up their own mind. The state can only select people to vote, but then they vote how they wish.
Sort of like how a judge can be appointed, but then can basically rule as they see fit. They cannot be fined or thrown out because they made a ruling whoever appointed them disagreed with.
I suppose that's how it should be, states rights after all.
It doesn't make sense for the constitution to specifically say each state gets X electors if it was just about state's rights. If it was about states rights, it would say each state gets X weight in their vote.
Since the constitution specifically requires people here, and allows each one to vote different than the others, it would seem to imply they should be able to make up their own mind. The state can only select people to vote, but then they vote how they wish.
Sort of like how a judge can be appointed, but then can basically rule as they see fit. They cannot be fined or thrown out because they made a ruling whoever appointed them disagreed with.