Just as long as we're not blaming men for having the deck stacked against them in the form of discriminatory and punitive divorce courts, I agree with this statement.
Just as long as we're not blaming men for having the deck stacked against them in the form of discriminatory and punitive divorce courts, I agree with this statement.
No fault divorce AND 50 years of male hatred is a stacked deck against 98% of men in divorce court.
Not advocating for punitive divorce or custody laws because i agree with you completely, but let me play devils advocate.
This post is decrying the horrible consequences of a fatherless (single parent) household. Do you think perhaps thats why the govt sees fit to punish those who decide to split the household? With men being the breadwinners historically it seems to make sense we end up on the losing end.
the reason it works the way it does is because single women already vote left more than they vote right, and if you reward a woman for detonating her own family with cash and prizes she will become hooked on the steady supply of "free money" from both her victim, I mean, ex-husband, and Uncle Sucker
no matter what race a welfare queen happens to be I bet if you plucked one out of the ghetto, trailer park, barrio, or wherever the fuck they'd all happen to vote the same way
Completely agree, the rates are just astronomically high percentage wise with basically every race but white. Even with white women its 24% which is still not good.
I believe it's 70% of all divorces, 91% when children are involved (91% might be tied to a particular state. Old stat I don't remember all the context around).
Not sure I follow that last sentence: "With men being the breadwinners historically it seems to make sense we end up on the losing end." Can you clarify the point you're making?
Over 95% of custody agreements are settled outside of court. When a case is settled by a judge, the father is more likely than not to get at least 50% custody IF he asks for it.
Men get the custody they want.
It’s a simple fact, spanning across all cultures, generations, regions, etc., that women spend more time caring for children than men do.
When there’s a legal relationship (marriage), women still do more childcare, and when there isn’t a legal relationship, women do MUCH more childcare.
Don’t blame hardworking mothers for the choices of lazy, walkaway fathers.
When you talk to a divorce lawyer, they explain to you your options, the chance of success, and how much its going to cost. If any of it becomes contested and you end up litigating, you're starting off at $10K.
The reason so many settle outside of court is because dads know they are going to lose anyways and they don't have 10s of thousands of dollars to fight the system.
^ That's exactly what happened with my uncle. Unless you're rolling in money, it's hard to fight the system. Thanks to that, he goes into a depression every Father's Day. By the time he finally was able to get in contact with his daughter, her mother had poisoned her mind so much that it had basically destroyed any chance of a relationship. She had moved her over many state lines, and didn't give her the option of calling her dad until she was roughly 15 years old. (So ... 10+ years after the divorce)
Over 95% of custody agreements are settled outside of court. When a case is settled by a judge, the father is more likely than not to get at least 50% custody IF he asks for it.
I've never heard the 95% statistic before. Since the devil's advocate argument you're putting forth is predicated entirely on this number, can you cite a source?
I just spent a while looking for the actual peer-reviewed article, however I wasn’t able to find it yet, but I’ll get back to you. I found lots of articles that cited the same “95%” stat, here is one of them:
I had a lot of good discussions (with solid links) but they were in my comment history from r/GenderCritical, and Reddit has just erased it and all our post history, as if it never happened.
Because God forbid women advocate for women and refuse to call a man in lipstick a female.
Just as long as we're not blaming men for having the deck stacked against them in the form of discriminatory and punitive divorce courts, I agree with this statement.
No fault divorce AND 50 years of male hatred is a stacked deck against 98% of men in divorce court.
Yet feminists pay for bunk "studies" that claim mothers are discriminated against in family court.
Their followers are so deranged that they happily swallow the lie.
For every (drug-using, abusive, and proven-to-be-lying) woman who gets "screwed" in family court there are a hundred dads.
Must destroy patriarchy!!!lol
DEADBEAT MOMS ARE THE PROBLEM.
Not advocating for punitive divorce or custody laws because i agree with you completely, but let me play devils advocate.
This post is decrying the horrible consequences of a fatherless (single parent) household. Do you think perhaps thats why the govt sees fit to punish those who decide to split the household? With men being the breadwinners historically it seems to make sense we end up on the losing end.
the reason it works the way it does is because single women already vote left more than they vote right, and if you reward a woman for detonating her own family with cash and prizes she will become hooked on the steady supply of "free money" from both her victim, I mean, ex-husband, and Uncle Sucker
no matter what race a welfare queen happens to be I bet if you plucked one out of the ghetto, trailer park, barrio, or wherever the fuck they'd all happen to vote the same way
Yeah I think I saw something from the 16 election saying that if Women didn't vote Trump would have won every state and county.
Completely agree, the rates are just astronomically high percentage wise with basically every race but white. Even with white women its 24% which is still not good.
If we're blaming the person who decides to split the household, keep in mind that the majority of divorces are initiated by the wife.
Women initiate 70% of divorces.
I believe it's 70% of all divorces, 91% when children are involved (91% might be tied to a particular state. Old stat I don't remember all the context around).
Not sure I follow that last sentence: "With men being the breadwinners historically it seems to make sense we end up on the losing end." Can you clarify the point you're making?
Over 95% of custody agreements are settled outside of court. When a case is settled by a judge, the father is more likely than not to get at least 50% custody IF he asks for it.
Men get the custody they want.
It’s a simple fact, spanning across all cultures, generations, regions, etc., that women spend more time caring for children than men do.
When there’s a legal relationship (marriage), women still do more childcare, and when there isn’t a legal relationship, women do MUCH more childcare.
Don’t blame hardworking mothers for the choices of lazy, walkaway fathers.
When you talk to a divorce lawyer, they explain to you your options, the chance of success, and how much its going to cost. If any of it becomes contested and you end up litigating, you're starting off at $10K.
The reason so many settle outside of court is because dads know they are going to lose anyways and they don't have 10s of thousands of dollars to fight the system.
^ That's exactly what happened with my uncle. Unless you're rolling in money, it's hard to fight the system. Thanks to that, he goes into a depression every Father's Day. By the time he finally was able to get in contact with his daughter, her mother had poisoned her mind so much that it had basically destroyed any chance of a relationship. She had moved her over many state lines, and didn't give her the option of calling her dad until she was roughly 15 years old. (So ... 10+ years after the divorce)
Keep pimpin' those lies.
I've never heard the 95% statistic before. Since the devil's advocate argument you're putting forth is predicated entirely on this number, can you cite a source?
I just spent a while looking for the actual peer-reviewed article, however I wasn’t able to find it yet, but I’ll get back to you. I found lots of articles that cited the same “95%” stat, here is one of them:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-divorce-process/#app
I had a lot of good discussions (with solid links) but they were in my comment history from r/GenderCritical, and Reddit has just erased it and all our post history, as if it never happened.
Because God forbid women advocate for women and refuse to call a man in lipstick a female.